I Can Commit To Not Starting A Levin Thread And Not Commenting On Any Such Thread
I Cannot Help Myself And May Comment On A Levin Thread Or Start A Levin Thread
Levin is irrelevant and engaging him is exactly his dream come true. IMHO.
Take the poll please!
I would love to believe that this would include all the other hacks that are just as irrelevant as him... Especially Dick Morris! Republicans don't even care about that toad, I see no reason for us to care.
My commitment vote actually solidifies my desire to neither post or see anything about any of the establishment shills. Not just Levin. But he's a good start.
That Jerry Doyle guy though... I like him
Sorry I have to monitor the enemy
But you create him by "monitoring" him.Originally Posted by mikeforliberty
I Cannot Help Myself And May Comment On A Levin Thread Or Start A Levin Thread
The first step is to admit you have a problem. That Levin has a power over your life that is greater than you.
Hey lots of people are viewing but not voting. Come on...step up to the plate and.....Take The No Levin Challenge!
I rarely contribute anything of value anyway, aside from a few, winning, snarky comments. Needless to say, I wasn't going to create a Mark Levin thread anyway.
"I shall bring justice to Westeros. Every man shall reap what he has sown, from the highest lord to the lowest gutter rat. They have made my kingdom bleed, and I do not forget that."
-Stannis Baratheon
I can top you... I am utterly useless on the forums. I can't believe I haven't been banned for uselessness. I just keep posting the same "Chain of Custody Sham" youtube video every chance I get.
Last edited by anaconda; 01-18-2012 at 01:56 AM.
I can't help but ask, but ... isn't this thread defeating its own purpose?
Consider: "This statement is a lie."
The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)
- "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
-- The Law (p. 54)- "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
-- Government (p. 99)- "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
-- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)- "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
-- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)· tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·
This is a poll thread. And does not require or solicit comments on any specific Levin show content. So I would say no, it doesn't defeat its own purpose. Unless there are Levin-specific comments.I can't help but ask, but ... isn't this thread defeating its own purpose?
Consider: "This statement is a lie."
Don't take our Levin away!
Out Levin! Out!
I know this is kind of a joke thread, but will still state that I want to be aware of what the current talking points are against Ron.
By continually bringing up Levin, Limbaugh, Hannity, and others, we can continue to push for people to contact the program managers of their local radio stations and have them taken off the air.
Right, but here's the thing. That concept is like watching two people looking at each other and discussing the sky. One guy say's the sky is blue. The other one says, no, it's not, it's pink. The other guy say's nope...it's blue. Then again, the other feller say's uh-uh. It's pink alright. Nah...it's blue..., say's the other dolt...no, the other guy say's again...it's pink.
Well, guess what? While that distraction was happening the thing was full of chemicals. Nobody saw that it was grey. Well...at least the folks watching the debate on whether it was blue or pink. Heck, they never even went outside to look. They just wanted to hear the meme.
Of course, those playing we ask, you decide knew full well it was grey. Why do you think they brought up the pink and the blue debate in the first place?...theoretically, of course.
This is what purpose memes serve. You see? Turn them off....please?
Last edited by Natural Citizen; 01-18-2013 at 09:24 PM.
You Make Levin Fun
Don't, don't break the spell
It would be different and you know it will
HA! Beyond that all I can say is: "give to me yo Levin, take from me..my lace...."You Make Levin Fun
Don't, don't break the spell
It would be different and you know it will
Last edited by anaconda; 12-19-2011 at 01:23 AM.
I didn't think Dr. Paul could win with Fox News against him, but now I believe he can!
Levin is nothing compared to that.
Dr. Paul can win in spite of them all!
We don't have to convince Levin's audience of anything.
We have to convince the caucus-goers.
That's best done with "phone from home."
Speak the truth, even if your voice shakes.
Well spoken. I agree that we should monitor Fox News. But I think Levin is a waste of time and counterproductive. It's embarrassing that people give him the time of day. Thus my OP.
Mark WHO??
Hey!! Why are people commenting on this thread!!! Ooops Sorry!
Cmon everybody. Take the Levin Challenge! But do not talk of Levin.
There are two rules for the Levin Challenge. Rule one: You do not talk about the Levin Challenge. Rule two: You DO NOT talk about the Levin Challenge.
“The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell
Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump
You just broke both rules
This post represents only the opinions of Christian Liberty and not the rest of the forum. Use discretion when reading
Who's Levin?
Exactly.
Fox News, MSM and Rush Limbaugh are probably worth watching and talking about.
The other guys... what's their names? I forget... uhhh... Oh, Matt Levin? That it? Mike Levin? Anyway... this guy isn't worth talking about, whatever his name is.
Space Hannity can probably be ignored since he's stale and has no depth or credibility...
And the Weiner Nation is pretty much for senile people.
I was trying to say this about the facebook group that is anti Ron paul, by all rights we are under our own right advocating that they be quiet when they have as much right to speak as we do. The difference is that when we don't pay attention and over-react to their comments they lose credibility, and eventually people begin to see the insanity that plagues them. Ignore them, and they will go away. If the do not, we can best them in debates. I have already issued challenges to many on the stop ron paul group of having legitimate peaceful, no namecalling debates, and have been declined. The best answer thus far is "we just like to bash RP." "I don't want to turn the group into a debate group" I told them I support them. (if they are reading this you know who this is.) :P
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us