International Banking And Feminism

[TomL]

The topic "The Feminization of America," now closed in the "Miscellaneous Discussion - Off Topic Forum," has received various responses on various internet sites. The following quote is from one of them.

The whole feminist agenda was a cover for the bankers (one of them, I'm sure there were many others). Pretty much with the national debt really starting to spiral out of control, this was one way of getting the wives to work so that the IRS can get taxes from the "other half" of the family.

And no, I'm not here saying women belong in the kitchen, etc, etc. But it was during the late 70's, early 80's when wives/mothers were being FORCED into these low paying jobs so that they could provide for their households. It ended up turning out for the worse, even though the bankers/IRS ended up profiting from the "other half" of the families.

And you know too - I grew up with folks telling me how people were scheming our welfare program, and ended up blaming them for our nation's economy to go sour. However, little did they know that NOT ONE NICKEL of our tax money went to government expenditures, but to pay down ONLY THE INTEREST of the national debt.

http://cj.myfreeforum.org/The_Femini...about2617.html (User: BornAgain2)

These statements planted a seed in my mind, and my experiences and observations of life fertilized it and it germinated and grew into a dominant thought which my brain spent some time on, and now is causing my brain to pose a question.

Is it possible that World War II was a creation of the International bandits called bankers, causing many men to go off to war, and women then entered the workforce, giving rise to the women's liberation movement all to siphon more money from the American taxpayer? Is the whole equality movement used for the same reason? Are the minimum wage laws also for the same reason?

It is true that the broader the tax base, and the higher the taxes, the greater the government revenue to the point that taxation now takes more than 1/2 of America's Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Is the feminization of America, and indeed in the whole world, a tool for the international bandits to eventually control a global currency? It has been reported that one of our accomplishments in Afghanistan and Iraq is the the liberation of women in those countries. Something that goes against the Islamic religion. While I am with the author of the above quotation as not here saying women belong in the kitchen, etc, etc, the beliefs of Islam are very different. Has feminism been used to ignite a constant civil war in the Arab world, while the international bandits benefit from the cost of war and laugh all the way to the bank?

I will admit that I do not know the answers to these questions, but I do have my suspicions. And there are those of you that have a better understanding of these issues than I, and I would like the benefit of your opinions.

Thank you.

[donnay]

Feminization was also an attempt to break up the family.

[TomL]

Feminization was also an attempt to break up the family.

But was that just a consequence of the intentions of the international bankers? I agree that feminism did break up the family. We covered that in "The Feminization of America." But, was all this staged for us to benefit the international bankers? In other words, was their a greater goal for the feminization of America than break up of the family. And is the same thing now happening in the Arab World?

[donnay]

But was that just a consequence of the intentions of the international bankers? I agree that feminism did break up the family. We covered that in "The Feminization of America." But, was all this staged for us to benefit the international bankers? In other words, was their a greater goal for the feminization of America than break up of the family. And is the same thing now happening in the Arab World?

It was staged to emasculate the men. Here is an excellent artical by Nancy Levant that sums it up quite nicely:

THE SYSTEMATIC EMASCULATION OF MEN

Nancy Levant
April 6, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

Like him or not, Carey Roberts doesn’t mince words, opinions, or facts. He’s one of those pesky and abrasive truth tellers that makes one breathe between the teeth or, in other words, makes one think even when cultural pressures demand that you don’t.

Political feminism is a beast. It is a dictatorial movement that demands gender behavior, gender roles, and gender servitude. It is not a movement based upon concern for women, but is wholly dedicated to 1) depopulation indoctrination and demand, and 2) the control of masculinity.

Let us begin by saying that 1) women are beaten and murdered by men in every cultural and in every country in the world. This we know. We also know that women kill women, men, and children in every cultural and country in the world, and that men perpetrate these same crimes upon other males in every culture and country in the world. People are not passive creatures.

We also know that women in other cultures and countries are not treated in the same fashion as they are treated in the United States, but that has far more to do with the fact that American males did, in fact, value their female counterparts, coupled with their cultural norms, Christian traditions, and constitutional laws, in a far more sincere and reasonable manner. In the great scope of world history, American men have fared beautifully in the treatment and respect of women due to the aforementioned reasons. In a global context, American women have had better treatment, rights, and cultural equality than most of the world’s women. Somehow, this fact is persistently ignored by America’s radical feminist fringe.

The fact that American women do have cultural respect, opportunities, and gender equality, is a uniquely and contemporary American tradition, and due largely to the genuine acceptance by American men of their female counterparts. Both genders have a very unique and a very good thing going in the United States – at least we use to. But I am very certain that the emasculation of males in this nation, by the very powerful and very globally funded and backed feminist lobby, has very ulterior motives.

It simply cannot be argued that depopulation is a key aspect of the global government’s mission. In fact, massive global depopulation is mandated by many, many decrees, commissions, think tanks, and movements. Genocide continues, unabated and globally, and century after century. “Disease” has become high science, massively funded, and continues, generation after generation, to be used as a lethal weapon. Many pharmaceutical drugs are dangerous to pregnant females. And new drugs have been engineered to all but eliminate menstrual cycles and to render men infertile. Genetically modified food has also been used to render men infertile. Religious suggestions to be fruitful have also been slated for political extinction, for as we know, too many commoners are problematic for the greed and sustainability of the elite.

Political depopulation strategies have been used to lower populations in resource-rich Third World Countries as defense and take-over policies, and we cannot forget Goals 2000, the 1974 report during the Carter administration, which promised that the U.S. would lower its population by multi-millions by 2050. So please, people, let us not continue to believe that “history” is accidental or by coincidence. History is orchestrated, planned, and funded at the expense of all tax payers who, pathetically and historically, pay for their manipulated demise time and time and time again.

The closing of American military bases, coupled with the homeland exiting of all American military men and women, is by no accident. Our military personnel are United Nations forces. First and foremost, get that through your heads. Secondly, consider that laws and pending legislation have now rendered non-military men, who remain on the homeland, virtually powerless. Their jobs left the homeland, the right to private arms is constantly being challenged and degraded, and any outward signs of aggression are fast becoming criminalized on all levels. Traditional and biological masculinity is rapidly becoming a crime – and not just in the United States of America. Remember that global governance is global law.

But why attempt to change the nature of human males? Let’s think about this. We know that men are more aggressive than females. We know that men are physically more powerful than females. We know that men have traditionally acted in defense of women and children, burg and community, state and nation – and particularly so via the mandates of the Constitution, the Second Amendment, and Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16, which were written SPECIFICALLY to address homeland security due to violations of law, insurrections, and/or invasions, and specific instructions for MEN on how to defend and protect all of the states in the nation.

Now, if men are culturally emasculated, redefined, and rendered incapable of bearing arms, what happens to the legal defense of this nation – especially given the fact that the American military is no longer the American military or present on the homeland?

If it is illegal for men to act defensively, to bear arms, to get mad, or to have opinions other than those crafted by social engineers, men are then rendered incapable of defensive (and Constitutional) duties and tendencies. See how cleverly this works?

Now, back to the feminist movement – as Carey Roberts has so courageously taught time and time again, the radical feminist movement is a political movement to emasculate men and to brainwash women. Mr. Roberts, you have always been right on the money. Political intent is never by accident – never. And the feminist movement, globally funded and created by the pathologically arrogant greed of dynastic social engineers, is but one effort to render impotent the sovereign United States and its Constitutional traditions. And sadly, terrifyingly, the men in this country have been severely damaged – financially, emotionally, intellectually, and defensively.

And American women? What can one say? Incapable of bearing children, maybe? However, they do have silicon boobs, fake fingernails, fake tans, bleached teeth, anti-depressants, credit cards, monumental debt, abortion rights, and starvation diets. They have daycare centers, Socialist indoctrination schools for their older children, and pre-military physical regimens called competitive/select sports for their children’s after-school care. What more could they want? Better ask the feminist movement. They will tell you exactly what women want.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy82.htm

[Steven Douglas]

Feminism, like capitalism, is one of those terms where multiple meanings are conflated until it the term is virtually meaningless.

I don't see the need for men and women needing to join into the workforce together to survive as part of some sinister master plan. Rather I see a sinister master plan, which involves little more than brute force control of money and political power, as in turn forcing people to behave as they might not otherwise felt the need otherwise.

It is elementary, and a matter of well documented history, that a debauched currency forces everyone into engaging in survival tactics as they are forced to keep pace with an accelerating artificially wealth-siphoning treadmill, and that this will in turn cause a rise in crime, as more and more are forced into poverty.

Is there some master plan to increase crime so that control freaks in government can finally have their much-dreamed of police state. No, I don't buy that, any more than I buy that feminism was deliberately devised by bankers or government as part of any master plan to emasculate the economy or human race.

There are some stark raving, frothing at the mouth lunatic militant feminists...but they are very small in numbers -- like kooks of all stripes. Most people, including most women, really do have their heads screwed on better than that. So if it really is just a question of knocking down a barrier (a REAL one, not just a pretend one, from some loopy equivocation), and if it really is about removing anything protectionist or artificially debilitating, it will be fought for, and I will be in favor of it. However, if it's about "tilting playing fields" and such, or figuring out how office personnel can have their wage prices artificially pegged to truck driver salaries, I'll be more about wanting to face-slap some sense into someone so that they can snap out of it.

I do see an emasculation of all nations, including ours, but to me that has everything to do with what is being heaped on us, both politically and economically, having very little to do with feminism or gender. To me it's just a constant shift of power away from people in general, as MEN AND WOMEN are having their mojo systematically drained from them.

[donnay]

Feminism, like capitalism, is one of those terms where multiple meanings are conflated until it the term is virtually meaningless.

I don't see the need for men and women needing to join into the workforce together to survive as part of some sinister master plan. Rather I see a sinister master plan, which involves little more than brute force control of money and political power, as in turn forcing people to behave as they might not otherwise felt the need otherwise.

It is elementary, and a matter of well documented history, that a debauched currency forces everyone into engaging in survival tactics as they are forced to keep pace with an accelerating artificially wealth-siphoning treadmill, and that this will in turn cause a rise in crime, as more and more are forced into poverty.

Is there some master plan to increase crime so that control freaks in government can finally have their much-dreamed of police state. No, I don't buy that, any more than I buy that feminism was deliberately devised by bankers or government as part of any master plan to emasculate the economy or human race.

There are some stark raving, frothing at the mouth lunatic militant feminists...but they are very small in numbers -- like kooks of all stripes. Most people, including most women, really do have their heads screwed on better than that. So if it really is just a question of knocking down a barrier (a REAL one, not just a pretend one, from some loopy equivocation), and if it really is about removing anything protectionist or artificially debilitating, it will be fought for, and I will be in favor of it. However, if it's about "tilting playing fields" and such, or figuring out how office personnel can have their wage prices artificially pegged to truck driver salaries, I'll be more about wanting to face-slap some sense into someone so that they can snap out of it.

I do see an emasculation of all nations, including ours, but to me that has everything to do with what is being heaped on us, both politically and economically, having very little to do with feminism or gender. To me it's just a constant shift of power away from people in general, as MEN AND WOMEN are having their mojo systematically drained from them.

I agree with your premise, but I also think it was a deliberate divide and conquer approach, the powers that be sought by falsely empowering women to act like men--which in return caused a lot of strife between the sexes.

[TomL]

I'm not sure, donnay, but it seems the article you posted seems to agree with my suspicions that feminism in America was created and funded by the globalists, who are set on global domination. One way of global domination is to control the world's money, and feminism has been a tool they have used for that purpose.

[Danke]

Fricken Donnay is an encyclopedia.

[donnay]

I'm not sure, donnay, but it seems the article you posted seems to agree with my suspicions that feminism in America was created and funded by the globalists, who are set on global domination. One way of global domination is to control the world's money, and feminism has been a tool they have used for that purpose.

Yes, it was done deliberately in American, however, Feminism has taken off around the globe to conquer and divide. Emasculate men, and feed them food that will lower their testosterone and make them docile. All done by design.

[kill the banks]

you might like http://www.savethemales.ca/001904.html ... Henry Makow Ph.D. ... he is Jewish and delivers his opinion on this