Tonight's debate is the Fox News debate. Those debates have always been open attacks against Ron Paul.
Which way do you think they will go this time?
Last time, the big Fox debate came with the question of "Electability, do you have any sir?"
Tonight's debate is the Fox News debate. Those debates have always been open attacks against Ron Paul.
Which way do you think they will go this time?
Last time, the big Fox debate came with the question of "Electability, do you have any sir?"
Definition of political insanity: Voting for the same people expecting different results.
Regardless of how he's attacked, he doesn't really have any baggage. Plus, he always turns his attacker's question into a supportive comment on the importance of liberty.
See how he answered that question last time. Hit a damn grand slam.
Hannity made it pretty clear yesterday that the newsletters are going to come up during this debate.
I agree, Ron Paul will do just fine for any question they give them.
Just curious of what angle they may take. From their news shows today they may try to make it seem like he cannot beat Obama in the general election.
He should turn that around and say that the fact that he is close to beating all of the other Republicans and the fact that those Republicans have very few real differences from Obama, that he will be able to beat Obama as well.
Definition of political insanity: Voting for the same people expecting different results.
Newsletters, 9/11, drugs, war of terror, etc.
I'm hoping that the campaign has developed some pithy responses that we haven't heard yet.
Isn't Neal Cavuto the moderator? I'm sure someone else will pick the questions, but I am sure he will do his best to deliver them in a noninsulting way.
"Integrity means having to say things that people don't want to hear & especially to say things that the regime doesn't want to hear.” -Ron Paul
“To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.” ― Aristotle
If by 9/11 you mean 'glee', he explained that quite well, and could use the opportunity to say it again to a wider audience. As for war on terror, just GIVE Ron an opportunity to discuss indefinite detention of American citizens within the US boundaries, without trial or recourse to a court. Please. As for newsletters, Ron wasn't in the management of that, only wrote a few articles, was practicing medicine at the time, and his patients during that time period, of all races and religions and poverty levels, from whom he would not accept medicare or medicaid but whom he never failed to treat for lack of ability to pay -- are his best character reference.
"Integrity means having to say things that people don't want to hear & especially to say things that the regime doesn't want to hear.” -Ron Paul
“To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.” ― Aristotle
Chris Wallace: Congressman Paul, since you wrote some despicable racist newsletters in the past and oppose the Civil Rights movement, how do you expect to maintain your composure in a national election running against a man you clearly hate because of the color of his skin?
I don't know how a moderator brings up the newsletters or 9/11 without looking a fool. The newsletters issue isn't really an issue at all(he didn't write them)... and the 9/11 comments are completely accurate.