Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Here's how to solve the debate time problem

  1. #1

    Here's how to solve the debate time problem

    Allocate each candidate ten minutes, total. Each candidate's clock counts down whenever he's talking. After his clock runs out, he says nothing (and gets asked no more questions) for the rest of the debate. He's welcome to blow all ten minutes on his first answer, or he can give a five-second soundbite answer to each question and save most of his time for his closing statement, or anything in between. He can spend more time on worthwhile questions and give just brief responses to questions which he thinks are a waste of time. All the clocks are displayed to be visible to all the candidates.
    The current idiotic rules just encourage each candidate to run his mouth as long as possible whenever he gets a chance, turning the debate into a time monopolization contest, to the detriment of substantive debate content.

    If anybody from the campaign is reading this, please ask Paul to propose this rule change for future debates. There's no good reason for the other candidates to refuse this change, and the candidates themselves are the ones who choose the debate rules.

    One other thing: if the moderators run _their_ mouths too much, like they did in tonight's debate (December 10), then each candidate still gets his full ten minutes, and the time comes out of the network's commercial break time.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Paul does okay in this format. I don't think he'd do as well if he knows there's a timer running, and every second he wasted on the current answer is a second he won't get on his next answer. (see Huckabee forum)

  4. #3
    lol the goal is not to provide equal time

  5. #4
    I think just having clocks / timers visible on the podium or behind the candidate, so that the audience can see how much time each candidate has been allotted, would be sufficient sunshine to coerce a fairer distribution of time from the moderators. No need to impose artificial limits. CBS took it on the chin for their 89 seconds fiasco and the blowback support for Ron was priceless.

  6. #5
    The first step to realizing they are all a sham is to realize how simple it would be to make a fair debate.
    I'm a moderator, and I'm glad to help. But I'm an individual -- my words come from me. Any idiocy within should reflect on me, not Ron Paul, and not Ron Paul Forums.

  7. #6
    I think the higher in the polls, the more time Dr. Paul will get; therefore, call from home gets Dr. Paul the most debate time.

    They always talk about the top two candidates and let's face it, Dr. Paul isn't there yet.

    Get to work with "phone from home"!



Similar Threads

  1. The Real Refugee Problem – And How To Solve It
    By Brian4Liberty in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-08-2015, 08:32 PM
  2. How do you solve a problem like Ron Paul?
    By JimInNY in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-28-2012, 10:11 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2011, 07:47 AM
  4. The Government can Solve Any Problem
    By Vessol in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 02:07 PM
  5. Humor: How do you solve a problem like Ron Paul?
    By Corydoras in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-13-2008, 09:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •