http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=15061600
No, you're caught in a lie, first when you made the statement about it being inactive ingredients and not worrying it means you have no understanding of what inactive ingredients means, either you're lying assuming I think that inactive means its not working or haven't looked up the definition, next the documentation said nothing about it being
EITHER removed, there happens to be no choice, next when you say trace quantities all that means is a small amount the relevance of how small is never determined inside of the vaccine and the documentation fails to say whether that amount is safe or not. Plus, there is non-biased research that documents the effects of these "inactive" ingredients.
Why don't you post it and also your statement makes no sense as someone who is only in complementary medicine has nothing to do with laetrile therapy. Complementary medicine is like acupuncture, qi-gong, breathing techniques, etc. Also, would you care to explain the fact that our diet consists of cyanide from Vitamin B17 and you never hear anything about people suffering toxicity from these diets? Also, why is it indigenous tribes such as the
Hopis and Hunza, their diet consists of mainly apricots they even eat the seeds and they rarely have Cancer? Why is it always the same research groups who have a vested interest in removing Laetrile always attempt to falsify documentation about these deaths yet they fail to explain how the food industry never has any. Any researcher who is paid off can skew data it isn't very difficult especially when those people are paid off by the same interests who have no interest in a natural treatment.
You talk about trace amounts of substances yet claim there are no ill effects from them. First, you provide absolutely no reason why vaccines should carry these toxic substances which means you are very disingenuine and not concerned about the baby's safety. You fail to state that babies receive over 30 shots in a quick session, (which is enormous compared to years ago) all with several toxic substances in each vaccine, these substances are not necessary and have no medical value. Also, you provide no proof that vaccines cause no harm when there are thousands of cases of babies with compromised immune systems, DNA damage, mitochondria damage, chemical damage, neurological problems, and inflammation reported. Many of these reports are buried by the Vaccine industry because vaccines have unscrupulous laws and most parents are unaware of the dangers of vaccines so they are not reported. Also, when you make asinine claims like these substances cause no harm you show that you have little understanding of the nature of the poisons and their effects. I can use non-biased information to prove that all of your statement is false and that information comes from sources not getting paid by the vaccine industry to create falsified reports.
Your statement is very inconsistent, you claim to be all for the benefits of vaccines, yet you are pushing for the dangerous substance in them as well. If you were genuine, you would try and be on a mission to remove these toxic substances from the vaccines. That is the issue, if you really want to get scientific yes, vaccines have saved a lot of lives, but your investing so much time in the vaccine your not understanding that there are far more effective methods to prevent any of those diseases then using vaccines like glutathione, silver, B12 just for starters. Plus, many of these substances pro-long life and make life more efficient and healthier and they seem to work so well with natural substances.
"From Dr. Mercola - It is also important to understand that autism was virtually unheard of before vaccinations; its emergence precisely parallels mass vaccination programs. ADD and learning disorders in children are also now being traced to childhood vaccinations. Brain damage, at any age, is by far the most common adverse reaction associated with vaccinations, although their actual numbers are not often reported accurately.
Furthermore, all vaccines are immunosuppressive, meaning that they lower your immune functions.
The chemicals and adjuvants in the vaccines depress your immune system;
The virus present depresses immune function, and
The foreign DNA/RNA from animal tissues depresses immunity."
Now, let's talk about why your laetrile documents should not be used. You have to wonder why if a substance doesn't work how come these same institutions after being caught falsifying reports have to keep attacking it years later to create more falsified reports and repeat the mantra.
Your first website should not be taken seriously at all because it comes from the Sloane-Kettering Institute which Ralph Moss exposed as being a front for the American Medical Society which has no interest in Laetrile as a Cancer remedy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=15061600
Your second website has falsified data and claims that laetrile has
adverse dangerous side effects, the entire case study is intellectually dishonest, which shows that the researcher is making this up from other falsified data, repeating this mantra and basically using scare tactics to dismay people from using the substance. Both biased reports which show little understanding of the data. If they were honest they would explain that cyanide is a beneficial substance that is found in our diet that attacks cancer cells and is broken down by the bodie's rhodonese. Instead, they resort to the usual skewing data tactics. All of the "sound clinical data" that they made up is not referenced so they are using a scientific mantra proven wrong to substantiate that claim and expecting you to take their word for it.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=22071824
BACKGROUND:
Laetrile is the name for a semi-synthetic compound which is chemically related to amygdalin, a cyanogenic glycoside from the kernels of apricots and various other species of the genus Prunus. Laetrile and amygdalin are promoted under various names for the treatment of cancer although there is no evidence for its efficacy.
Due to possible cyanide poisoning, laetrile can be dangerous.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
The claims that laetrile or amygdalin have beneficial effects for cancer patients are not currently supported by
sound clinical data.
There is a considerable risk of serious adverse effects from cyanide poisoning after laetrile or amygdalin, especially after oral ingestion. The risk-benefit balance of laetrile or amygdalin as a treatment for cancer is therefore unambiguously negative.
Here are publications of Laetrile. If you notice that all of the bad research towards Laetrile comes after the positive results which proves the fact that they want to bury its effectiveness. If Laetrile didn't work you would find bad results around this time period that other researchers found positive results on.
On another note, the only time when serious consideration towards research was when there was positive research at the Sloane-Kettering Institute, the researchers then continued to find more positive studies instead of printing those out they dumped them and that is when Ralph Moss spoke out and was fired from the research company.
Peer-Reviewed Professional Publications
• Burk, D.,et al. Hyperthermy of cancer cells with Amigdaline glucosidase and synergistic action of derivated cyanide and benzaldehyde. Minerva Chir. 24:1144- 1145, 1969.
• Navarro, M. et al. Mechanism of action and therapeutic effects of Laetrile in cancer. J. Phillip. Med. Assoc. 33:620-627., 1957.
• Reitnauer, P. Prolonged survival of tumor-bearing mice following feeding bitter almonds. Archiv Geschwulstforschung. 42:135, 1973.
• Summa H. M. Amygdalin. A physiological active therapeutic agent in malignancies. Krebsgeschehen, a., Jossa-Arznei, Steinan, Germany, 1972.
Laypersons’ Publications
• Culbert, Michael F. Freedom from Cancer: The Amazing Story of Vitamin B-17, or Laetrile. 76 Press.
• Culbert, Michael. Vitamin B-17: Forbidden Weapon Against Cancer; The Fight for Laetrile. Arlington House Publications. November 1974.
• Diamond, W. J., et al. (editors). An Alternative Medicine Definitive Guide to Cancer. Future Medicine Publications. Tiburon, California, USA. 1997.
Amygdalin appears to neutralize the oxidative cancer-promoting compounds such as free
radicals. Laetrile should be considered an effective, entirely safe treatment of all types of
cancer. Laetrile is useful for the prevention of cancer and for maintaining its remission. Some
contributors to this book claim that “there is nothing as effective as laetrile”. Laetrile can be
used indefinitely and if necessary, in conjunction with surgery, radiation therapy and
chemotherapy. Specific types of cancer mentioned as being responsive to laetrile include lung
cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer, esophageal cancer, prostate cancer and
lymphomas. Some contributors recommend using n-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) in conjunction with
laetrile for cancer therapy. This is because cysteine maximizes the body’s ability to detoxify the
cyanide released from Taetrile. Some contributors have found that laetrile reduces the
requirement for painkillers in cancer patients.
• Griffin, G. E. World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17.
• Hill, Rick. Too Young to Die: Dramatic Use of Laetrile to Conquer Terminal Cancer. Rick Hill Publications. June 1979.
• Inozenzov, F. Two fungus like tumors healed without operation, by oral Amigdalin. Gazet Med. de Paris. 37, 1845.
• Kittler, Glenn D. Laetrile Control for Cancer. Astor Honor. June 1963.
• Knaus, H. Laetrile Control for Cancer. Astor Honor. March 1963.
• Moss, Ralph W. Cancer Therapy: the Independent Consumer’s Guide to Non-Toxic Treatment & Prevention. Equinox Press, Brooklyn, New York, USA. 1992:267-274.
• Prince, Patricia. The Contreras Clinic Laetrile Cookbook. Devin-Adair Pub. September 1979.
• Richardson, John and P. Griffin. Laetrile Case Histories. Bantam Books. June 1977.
• South, J. Laetrile: the answer to cancer? Anti-Aging Bulletin. 4(7):10-20, 2000.
Laetrile may kill cancer cells via a synergistic cytotoxic reaction between its breakdown products - cyanide and benzaldehyde.
• Timms, Moira. Natural Sources: Vitamin B-17/Laetrile. Celestial Arts. March 1978.
• Politics, science, and cancer: the laetrile phenomenon. Westview Press for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington.
Connect With Us