HARRY BROWNE: In my suggested portfolio, 25% is in cash. And I have suggested that the cash portion should be either in Treasury Bills or in a money market fund that invests only in Treasury Bills. And the reason for that you don't want to be concerned about credit risk. Same thing with the bond portion, it should be in Long Term Treasury Bonds, because despite the terrible way the Treasury handles its money. And its not really the Treasury so much as [the way] Congress, and the President handle money and create all of these fiscal crises and the deficits and so forth. Despite all that, the fact is that the Treasury can always tax us or even print the money as necessary to repay the principal and interest. Now doing that, of course, creates bad problems. But it creates bad problems not just for Treasury securities, but for all types of debts. CDs, the Bonds of other companies, and Commercial Paper and all of these things are affected by it. And what you know is that there is no credit risk with any kind of Treasury securities, even though there may be an investment risk. But there is credit risk with the others. If we had sudden Deflation in this country, it may well be that banks would not have the money to repay all of the CDs that they have issued. Now, we like to think that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation would back up the banks. But, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation keeps only about 1% to 2% in a reserve fund. 1% to 2% of all the liabilities it has. So, it's in a position, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to bail out a single bank when it fails, or another bank when it fails, or another bank over here when it fails. But, if we had a run on the banks in this country, and all banks were under siege from depositors who are afraid and wanting to get their money out of [them], there's no way in the world the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation would back them up. Now Congress could appropriate money out of the General Fund for the FDIC, but I suspect that the Budget itself would be in horrendous shape at a time like that, and it wouldn't be likely that Congress would just vote to pay off all those liabilities of the banks 100¢ on the Dollar. Rather they would come up with some kind of plan that you got 50¢ on the Dollar, or only people who could show they were in need got it. Or in some other way it would renege on the promises, but attempt to pay off part of it. But, the Treasury Bills would be in a different position. They would be continually refinanced and taken care of. Now I'm talking about an extreme case here, and the situation that would exist. But, I believe that the Permanent Portfolio and the safety part of it should be set up not just for the risks that we can see in front of us, but for the unthinkable. For the things we just don't expect to happen. Like civil unrest in this country. Or other things of... A run on the banks or whatever it may be. Or hyperinflation of 20% or 30%. Whatever it might be that we don't see today as an imminent threat, the Permanent Portfolio should be able to cover all of those things so that you don't have to stay on top of it. So you don't have to keep reading the news and say, 'My gosh, are we going run into an unprecedented situation here now, and am I covered?' I want you to be covered no matter what happens...Now, the downside of the Treasury Bills is that they will not pay as much in interest as the CDs or any other short term kind of debt. And that's because Treasury Bills do have virtually zero credit risk, while the others have some measure of credit risk and that's what causes them to have a larger interest rate.
Connect With Us