U.S. Tells Citizens to Leave Syria “Immediately”

[John F Kennedy III]

U.S. Tells Citizens to Leave Syria “Immediately”

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
November 23, 2011



Earlier today we reported that Arab states are set to impose a no fly zone over Syria with US logistical support, advancing the prospect of a military assault to take out Syrian President Bashar al-Assad under a “humanitarian” pretext.

In Libya, a no-fly zone was established as a pretext prior to NATO’s bombing of the country and the arming and directing of al-Qaeda rebels who eventually overthrew and murdered Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi.

In early October it was reported that a senior Syrian officer who had defected was the head of a newly formed Syrian Free Army – a force made up of defectors from the Syrian military – devoted to overthrowing the regime of Bashar al-Assad by military force in apparent connivance with his Turkish protectors, according to The Independent.

Now CBS and the AP are reporting that the U.S. embassy in Damascus has told its citizens to leave the country immediately. Turkey has also advised its citizens to leave.

“The U.S. Embassy continues to urge U.S. citizens in Syria to depart immediately while commercial transportation is available,” said a statement issued to the American community in Syria Wednesday and posted on the Embassy’s website. “The number of airlines serving Syria has decreased significantly since the summer, while many of those airlines remaining have reduced their number of flights.”

The State Department pulled the U.S. ambassador Robert Ford from the country in late October after it claimed his life was threatened. Ford was quietly sent back last week.

The call for U.S. and Turkish citizens to depart Syria immediately lends credence to speculation that the U.S. will orchestrate the removal of al-Bashar.

In April we speculated that the U.S. and the EU would eventually impose a no-fly zone on Syria in response to alleged human rights violations and this would be used as a cover to support the overthrow of al-Bashar.



http://www.infowars.com/u-s-tells-ci...a-immediately/

[Zippyjuan]

It is not uncommon for the State Department to suggest that US citizens leave countries with potentially dangerous situations. It does not necessarily mean that there is going to be any attack on the country. They were also urged to leave Egypt during protests there. http://articles.cnn.com/2011-02-03/u...lines?_s=PM:US

[MikeM39]

It is not uncommon for the State Department to suggest that US citizens leave countries with potentially dangerous situations. It does not necessarily mean that there is going to be any attack on the country. They were also urged to leave Egypt during protests there. http://articles.cnn.com/2011-02-03/u...lines?_s=PM:US

As it stands today the U.S. would need permission from Russia to attack Syria. A lot of these rabid Republican hawks don't realize that Russia has a naval base on the coast of Syria and that in the last 40 years Syria has been Russia's greatest ally in the region.

[DamianTV]

I've stated this in other threads...

There are only 3 countries on the planet now that do not have a Central Bank: Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Anyone noticing a pattern?

[ShaneEnochs]

I've stated this in other threads...

There are only 3 countries on the planet now that do not have a Central Bank: Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Anyone noticing a pattern?

We can agree that North Koreans (or at the very least the government) is bat$#@!, right?

[robert9712000]

In Libya, a no-fly zone was established as a pretext prior to NATO’s bombing of the country and the arming and directing of al-Qaeda rebels who eventually overthrew and murdered Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi.

Thats pretty messed up if that statement is accurate.Weve fought a undeclared war against Iraq and Afghanistan with the supposed purpose of defeating al-Qaeda for over 10 years and all of the sudden were arming them and encouraging them to take over in Libya?Something doesnt sound right,are there any other news stories confirming that claim?

[Feeding the Abscess]

I've stated this in other threads...

There are only 3 countries on the planet now that do not have a Central Bank: Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Anyone noticing a pattern?

Iran has a central bank:

http://www.cbi.ir/default_en.aspx

[pcosmar]

Iran has a central bank:

http://www.cbi.ir/default_en.aspx

You miss the point. It has an independent Central Bank.

It is unconnected from the IMF and World Bank. Separate from the Bankers that are raping the planet (the Rothschild Banks)

[Feeding the Abscess]

You miss the point. It has an independent Central Bank.

It is unconnected from the IMF and World Bank. Separate from the Bankers that are raping the planet (the Rothschild Banks)

Iran has been part of the IMF since 1945, the World Bank has financed at least 48 projects to the tune of $3.4 billion in Iran, and Iran is a member of the World Bank's Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency.

I would argue that any central bank that is not a part of a completely isolated society is a tool of the Rothschilds and the banking cartel, regardless of its foundings or intentions.

In any event, it is sad that even members of the liberty movement, such as Rand Paul, seem to think they have jurisdiction over the CBI.

[Brian4Liberty]

I've stated this in other threads...

There are only 3 countries on the planet now that do not have a Central Bank: Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Anyone noticing a pattern?

Sounds like the German Central Bank hasn't been appropriately subservient either. Time for a no-fly zone over Germany?

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/...as-taken-over/

[Zippyjuan]

Iran has a central bank:

http://www.cbi.ir/default_en.aspx

So does Syria.
http://www.banquecentrale.gov.sy/

And North Korea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central...ublic_of_Korea

[eduardo89]

So does Syria.
http://www.banquecentrale.gov.sy/

And North Korea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central...ublic_of_Korea

I'm so sure this was discussed in another thread cause I posted that exact same answer lol

[Lomez]

Thats pretty messed up if that statement is accurate.Weve fought a undeclared war against Iraq and Afghanistan with the supposed purpose of defeating al-Qaeda for over 10 years and all of the sudden were arming them and encouraging them to take over in Libya?Something doesnt sound right,are there any other news stories confirming that claim?

I thought that was strange as well. Is it a misprint, or have the Libyan rebels actually been tied to al-Qaeda?

[Zippyjuan]

The Lybian rebels are comprised of many groups who were opposed to Khadaffi. Yes, a few were al-Queada but that does not mean that the movement was al- Qaeda.

[Peace&Freedom]

The salient point about central banking is, is the country controlled by the West or not, through its currency system or debt obligations? By that measure, Iran, Syria and North Korea are not part of the international banking club, regardless of it setting up its own bank or having some interaction with the international banks. Libya had a state run, equity based currency system under Qadhafi, which it was encouraging other nations in Africa to adopt. It was thus not under control of the international network, nor in significant debt to those forces, and was trying to spread financial independence to others. That's a major reason why it went down. Iran's connection to the IMF is likewise not a controlling one, and they have moved away from using the dollar as a reserve currency. That's why it and Syria are next on the hit list.

The salient point about Al Qaeda is, why are western nations even allowing it to be among the factions opposing Qadhafi? Kimmo and other reporters have documented CIA and other outside intelligence funding and collaborating with opposition forces from well before Qadhafi's crackdown early this year, the event that supposedly instigated the rebels' 'request' for outside aid. Meaning, the Al Qaeda forces were also getting the aid prior to the 'spontaneous' outcry for NATO help. STOP BEING IN CONSTANT DENIAL over the political theater and machinations, if CIA was involved prior to the conflict, its asset Al Qaeda was part and parcel of the operations from the start.

[Revolution9]

We can agree that North Koreans (or at the very least the government) is bat$#@!, right?

We are led to believe such. Apparently the cabal uses it to park and transfer loot. It is best for it to remain a "pariah" that is beyond the scope of international financial regulatory investigations.

Rev9

[pcosmar]

I've stated this in other threads...

There are only 3 countries on the planet now that do not have a Central Bank: Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Anyone noticing a pattern?

OK,, make it clearer for folks. It does not have a Rothschild controlled bank.

Can't have a One World Government till everyone is under control of ONE BANK.

[John F Kennedy III]

The salient point about central banking is, is the country controlled by the West or not, through its currency system or debt obligations? By that measure, Iran, Syria and North Korea are not part of the international banking club, regardless of it setting up it own bank or having some interaction with the international banks. Libya had a state run, equity based currency system under Qadhafi, which it was encouraging other nations in Africa to adopt. It was thus not under control of the international network, nor in significant debt to those forces, and trying to spread financial independence to others. That's a major reason why it went down. Iran's connection to the IMF is likewise not not a controlling one, and they have moved away from using the dollar as a reserve currency. That's why it and Syria are next on the hit list.

The salient point about Al Qaeda is, why are western nations even allowing it to be among the factions opposing Qadhafi? Kimmo and other reporters have documented CIA and other outside intelligence funding and collaborating with opposition forces from well before Qadhafi's crackdown early this year, the event that supposedly instigated the rebels 'request' for outside aid. Meaning, the Al Qaeda forces were also getting the aid prior to the 'spontaneous' outcry for NATO help. STOP BEING IN CONSTANT DENIAL over the political theater and machinations, if CIA was involved prior to the conflict, its asset Al Qaeda was part and parcel of the operations from the start.

+ rep for truth