Is Mark Levin, talk show host, a RINO in drag supporting Herman Cain?

[johnwk]

.

What I find very alarming is our “conservative” radio talk show hosts are constantly referring to Herman Cain as a “conservative”, as if there is an intentional motive by these hosts to convince listeners that Herman Cain is a ‘conservative”, when in fact Herman’s 9-9-9 plan is comparable to government enforced “central planning“ on a federal level. And let us not forget how that central planning thing worked out for the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics“!



QUESTION:

Why would Mark Levin and other “conservative” talk show hosts constantly call Herman Cain a “conservative” when the evidence of Herman’s political “conservatism” is his 9-9-9 proposal and includes “opportunity zones” which is a proposal for federal “central planning”, big government picking winners and losers; would be an outright assault upon our free market system; is a proposal which violates our founder’s intentions forbidding preferential regulations of commerce to be granted by Congress to any state; blatantly proposes unequal tax law; and obviously ignores that part of our Constitution which requires direct taxes to be apportioned and indirect taxes to be uniform throughout the United States?

Why does Mark Levin call Herman Cain a “conservative” when Herman Cain proposes a further trashing of our Constitution; would enlarge our federal government’s central planning ambitions and trash our free market system; and would have big government picking winners and losers just as Obama‘s administration has done with the Solyndra swindle and plundering of our federal treasury?

Tell us Mark Levin, what part of Federalist No. 45 do you not understand which summarizes our federal government’s constitutionally limited job as follows?


“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.


The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.

Tell us Mark Levin, what part of the Tenth Amendment which was specifically adopted to give force and effect to Federalist No. 45 and guarantee “federalism“, our Constitution’s plan, do you not understand, when you dare to call Herman Cain a “conservative“?


JWK



Read my lips Herman Cain. No additional national sales tax on top of the socialist tax calculated from incomes which you support.

[heavenlyboy34]

You should call in to levin's show. Tell us how it goes.

[GeorgiaAvenger]

You should call in to levin's show. Tell us how it goes.

Or try to challenge him like Woods and Hunter

[dbill27]

Could the GOP be more embarassing? Palin, Trump, Cain all able to dominate polls. How stupid is the actual average republican voter? And this is the better of the 2 parties.

[johnwk]

You should call in to levin's show. Tell us how it goes.

It would go the same way it would go if someone called into the Neal Boortz show to point out that H.R. 25, the alleged fairtax, is a clever proposal to establish a national retail sales tax while keeping alive Congress` power to lay and collect taxes calculated from profits, gains, and other “incomes”, just as Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 plan would do. There would be a lot of loud mouthed insulting remarks and name calling by Mark, not to mention the old filibuster used to avoid an appropriate response and productive discussion.

Anytime Mark feels he has been called onto the carpet without cause, he is free to meet me in one of these forums and defend himself. My mission is merely to point out his, and other “conservative” talk show host’s hypocrisy.



JWK

[johnwk]

Do any of our “conservative” talk show hosts have any idea what Cain’s is proposing with his “opportunity zones“? People and businesses situated in those zones would be relieved of paying taxes which people and businesses situated a block away would be forced to pay. That just happens to be a flagrant violation of equal law and our Constitution’s rule that requires direct taxes to be apportioned and indirect taxes are to be uniform throughout the United States. Cain’s plan in fact picks winners and losers, just as Obama has been doing with his Solyndra swindling which leaves the American taxpayer on the hook. Are our “conservative” talk show hosts comfortable with Cain’s Soviet style central planning crap? Why do they not object to Cain’s proposed attack on our free market system?


Cain’s plan would also ignore our Constitution’s Tenth Amendment which was specifically adopted to guarantee federalism, our Constitution’s plan. And the above objections do not even take into consideration our founding father’s intentions stated in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 6 of our Constitution which forbids the federal government to grant preferential regulations of commerce within the various united States.


So why does Mark Levin and our other “conservative” talk show hosts [Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Schnitt, Dennis Prager, Bill O'rielly, Mike Gallagher, Lee Rodgers, Doc Thompson, Neal Boortz. Tammy Bruce, Monica Crowley, and FoxNews personalities] call Herman Cain a “conservative” when his “opportunity zones are anything but conservative and mimic Soviet style central planning crap?


JWK


Read my lips Herman Cain. Keep your freaken nose out of my State’s internal commerce.

[Ronulus]

Mark Levin always touts himself as being a constitutional expert and teaches classes on the constitution. Yet the guy thinks the wars are good and ok, the killing of citizens with drones is ok, the men and women being killed in these wars is ok (as long as you support the cause). The guy has no real talking points about limited government other than saying Obama is a big screw up.

It seems all these hosts do is complain about democrats/liberals the entire time without actually looking at issues or talking about philosophy and whats best for the country.

[freejack]

Levin is in the same category as Bob Grant and Michael Savage. They are the equivalent to talk show versions of insult comedians. There's always an audience because they feed off people's fears and biases. In the end, it's all just entertainment and narcissism disguised as concerned discourse.

[Brian4Liberty]

Levin is a Constitutionalist In Name Only.

He is a faker, manipulator, and propagandist. No reason to take anything he says at face value.

[johnwk]

Levin is a Constitutionalist In Name Only.

He is a faker, manipulator, and propagandist. No reason to take anything he says at face value.

Unfortunately he has Tea Party activists bamboozled.

JWK

Read my lips Herman Cain. Keep your freaken nose out of my State’s internal commerce.

[johnwk]

Wow. I see Mark Levin was on again last night whining about the he said she said crap. Mark Levin, with this alleged sexual harassment stuff, is worse than a bunch of college campus sorority sisters who can’t wait for their afternoon soaps to come on tv.

Mark Levin should be more worried about what Herman Cain is proposing for the nation, such as his soviet style central planning crap which he panhandles in Orwellian Newspeak as being "opportunity zones". Who cares about the he said she said sex crap? What is important is what Herman Cain and the other candidates are proposing for the nation.

Why is Mark Levin participating in this distraction?

JWK



Read my lips Herman Cain. Keep your freaken nose out of my State’s internal commerce.

[kahless]

Mark Levin is NOT a defender of the Constitution nor is he by any means a Conservative. His technique to fool people otherwise is absolutely brilliant since is able to fool so many people. The same thing goes for Hannity, Bill O and Foxnews as a whole.

Their beliefs are no different from the hardcore Socialists they criticize. Their job is to wear the clothing of the opposition to heard them to the correct big government Socialist candidate and it works. It is pretty outrageous but you have to admit they are really good at what they do in their ability to fools millions of people and throw elections in favor of Progressives and Socialists.

[johnwk]

Could the GOP be more embarassing? Palin, Trump, Cain all able to dominate polls. How stupid is the actual average republican voter? And this is the better of the 2 parties.

There is a very big difference between a "republican voter" and voters who support and defend our constitutionally limited, "Republican Form of Government".

Mark Levin has promoted a number of things which would subjugate the provisions of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text. Take a look at his "liberty Amendments" e.g., one which would make it constitutional, to not extinguish annual deficits with an apportioned direct tax as our founders intended.


JWK




Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary