Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: David Hanson rebuts Herman Cain: Try the 0-0-0 Plan

  1. #1

    Default David Hanson rebuts Herman Cain: Try the 0-0-0 Plan

    In his return to WorldNetDaily.com commentary, David Hanson rebuts Herman Cain's 9-9-9 scheme with a plan of his own: 0-0-0.
    No income tax, no sales tax, no corporate tax.

    To eliminate the shortfall, Hanson suggests dramatic spending cuts and a federal tax on all state budgets.

    Read the article here:
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=350621

    Be sure to share the 0-0-0 plan with any media and social networks with which you are involved.



  • #2
    Member Voluntary Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    everywhere & nowhere, but always here: Union of Soviet America
    Posts
    1,519
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    actually, the only one of those taxes i can't find a major flaw with is the corporate taxes; after all, corporations do apply for and receive special privileges and protections from the government. but, corporate taxes should probably be paid to the government issuing the protections (usually a state).

  • #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Voluntary Man View Post
    actually, the only one of those taxes i can't find a major flaw with is the corporate taxes; after all, corporations do apply for and receive special privileges and protections from the government. but, corporate taxes should probably be paid to the government issuing the protections (usually a state).
    Ron actually advocated raising corporate taxes during his 1996 re-entry to Congress, and I suspect this was his very reasoning. Wish I could find the issues questionnaire that contains that.

  • #4

    Default

    Corporations that lobby and receive subsidies and regulations should be exempt from any tax cut.

  • #5
    Member Sentient Void's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,445
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    The idea of 'corporate taxes' is a farce. Corporations don't pay taxes. *WE* pay corporate taxes through higher prices hidden in the good or service's cost.

    It's like property taxes. Do property owners pay the property tax? Or do renters through a higher rent? Property taxes ultimately hurt those with the least assets, money and income the most. Same as Corporate taxes.

    I'm intrigued by this proposed tax on State budgets. I don't know exactly how I feel about it or what it's implications are. Not saying I agree with it, just that it's intriguing.
    Last edited by Sentient Void; 10-01-2011 at 03:47 PM.
    "If men are good, then they need no rulers. If men are bad, then governments of men, composed of men, will also be bad - and probably worse, due to the State's amplification of coercive power." - Ozarkia

    "Big Brother is watching. So are we." - WikiLeaks

    Laissez-nous faire, laissez-nous passer. Le monde va de lui meme.

  • #6

    Default

    This/\

    He said it all.

    Yet state taxes will simply be a tax on the people paying state taxes. Just like those who pay corporate taxes through higher prices. I say end the federal government all together.
    Last edited by Carehn; 10-01-2011 at 04:11 PM.
    Terminus tela viaticus!

  • #7

    Default

    Corporations always pass the buck on consumers.

  • #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    11,569

    Default

    The two ways corporations pay taxes:

    Raising prices (so in the end we, the consumers, pay)

    Cutting costs (lowering wages, so in the end we, the workers, pay)

  • #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Feeding the Abscess View Post
    Ron actually advocated raising corporate taxes during his 1996 re-entry to Congress, and I suspect this was his very reasoning. Wish I could find the issues questionnaire that contains that.
    I don't think that's true. Ron has never advocated any tax increase on any individual or business. I believe he wants the corporate tax rate to be 0% now. That's what the rate should be.

  • #10

    Default

    Realistically, the federal government is never going to cut enough spending to make up for the revenue that would be lost by abolishing the income tax. That's simply a fact. The only viable alternative is to replace the income tax with a consumption tax, because at least with a consumption tax, people have more of a choice in how much in taxes they end up paying. If we actually returned to Constitutional government we wouldn't need either an income tax or a consumption tax, but realistically it's not likely that Congress will ever reduce the size of government in any significant way.

  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •