There would never be such a high birth rate, especially since people would probably be living in spaceships anyways under your scenario. If you want to claim a section of outerspace and not allow people to go through your part of space without paying a toll then yeah I think that's a bit ludicrous.
But to humor you lets assume there was such a population of humans in outer space. You have no more right to claim the asteroid as 'yours' anymore than you did on Earth. As Thomas Paine said, "There could be no such thing as landed property originally. Man did not make the earth, and though he had a natural right to occupy it, he had no right to locate as his property in perpetuity on any part of it."
What do you think of the scenario of the astronaut crashlanding on someone's asteroid? What about the island scenario I posted?
No idea who BillG is. This is the only username I've ever used on this site.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us