Recently a friend of mine asked me the following question:
He forwarded me the following video as an example of what he's talking about.Ron Paul doesn't run as an independent because he is realistic in that we as a country do badly in practicing democracy. That unless you have millions of dollars like Ross Perot you have little to no chance of being elected. With that understanding why does he not understand the idea behind regulating big business? For example without millions of dollars to spend on lawyers how can an individual go up against a large corporation if without regulation or government protections to doing damage to individuals your only recourse is to bring a large corporation to court? As in the case of running for president in this day and age the only chance of winning is either running as a Republican or Democrat or being independently wealthy, and the only way of beating a large corporation in court is either through a class action suit (which is difficult to manage and still requires lots of money) or to be independently wealthy.
Any help in answering this would be appreciated.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us