"...if you could employ people to dig a ditch and then fill it up again, that's fine, they're being productively employed, they'll pay taxes, so maybe Boston's Big Dig was just fine after all."
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn..../gps-episodes/
"...if you could employ people to dig a ditch and then fill it up again, that's fine, they're being productively employed, they'll pay taxes, so maybe Boston's Big Dig was just fine after all."
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn..../gps-episodes/
If I was a statist, this would rock me back: YouTube - Michael Badnarik on liberty
Airing Date Aug.14, 2011
Paul Krugman Suggests A Space Alien Economy?
Paul Krugman is the biggest idiot I've ever heard speak.
"We don't have a first amendment so that we can talk about the weather. We have the First Amendment so that we can say very controversial things. So for people to say that yes we have our religious beliefs protected, but people who want to follow something else or a controversial religion, you can't do this, if you have the inconsistency then you're really not defending liberty." -- Ron Paul
Alms: 1Ketpbt6Rgoht3YhccJFh3zuZVNaThL2u1
My music/art page is here"government is the enemy of liberty"-RPOriginally Posted by Ron Paul
That which doesn't kill me has made a grave tactical error
Wait a sec.
this was moved,,,to ,,,here.
Ghhaaaa!
That is almost as ridiculous as this idiot talking.
Why do people listen to this guy?
Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
Ron Paul 2004
Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
It's all about Freedom
Well, had he said something like "If aliens came to Earth, established trade with us, and shared their technology, the recession would be over in 18 months" then he would have been correct.
Instead, he basicially said (taking this from Peter Schiff) that we would be better off if the government were to decide to build a fleet full of thousands of ships and building through the following measures; forcing everyone to work 70 hours a week for almost no money, creating food and oil shortages, preventing anyone from buying anything other than government bonds, deporting 10% of our workforce, forcing children and the elderly to work in factories, borrowing ten trillions dollars to build it, and ultimately sinking the fleet for no real reason.
Last edited by Cutlerzzz; 08-14-2011 at 06:37 PM.
He's not right. He is suggesting that it would be helpful to have an "alien defense" bubble; no different, logically, than the housing bubble which he promoted. The whole problem is that "alien defense" is not what people value in the long term. After the aliens are adequately defended against, the "alien defense" is no longer needed. All of the resources which went into building and maintaining alien defense must be reallocated (the bubble bursts). But, no fear, according to Krugman we can just keep creating bubbles. Krugman seems to think, simply, that the movement of resources is what is good for the economy. He can't see beyond his statistics and equations. He refuses to consider the long-term consequences of funneling resources to a bad or unsustainable place. This, really, is the view of someone who has a hard time with the logical thought process.
It is absolutely sickening that he has credibility.
Last edited by couvi; 08-14-2011 at 06:40 PM.
I guess this is how you act when everything you hold dear is going bankrupt and falling to pieces.
Defend liberty, Michiganders! Join the Tenth Amendment Center & work to nullify the Feds in your community today:
http://michigan.tenthamendmentcenter.com