Club for Growth says Ron Paul would be a pro-growth Pres but grouses re:opposition 2 NAFTA

[sailingaway]

etc.

They think he is too principled. They put it in terms of holding out for a utopian society, since saying you oppose the too principled part probably isn't as persuasive.

Still, hitting him for preferring the Constitution to NAFTA just doesn't strike me as persuasive to the common man. Doubtless it will impact donations from business interests, however.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/59581.html

Here is the actual Club for Growth white paper: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepa...sec=137&id=921

It has a lot of good stuff in it, if you ignore the utopia vs. NAFTA part and their complete refusal to acknowledge that the separation of powers in the constitution REQUIRES that spending be earmarked by Congress as a PROTECTION to the people against a dictator, but then, they make it clear they want a line item veto which also erodes separation of powers keeping the power of the purse in Congress.

[Pro-Life Libertarian]

Interesting

[Napoleon's Shadow]

This is an OUTRAGE!


They are judging candidates based upon ideological purity but yet when a candidate is "pure" regarding their ideology they slam him for it?!

This is just an excuse not to give him 100% and be able to give Bachmann a higher score.


These guys are acting like hacks and are losing credibility due to their lack of integrity.

EVERYONE SHOULD E-MAIL AND CALL them to complain!
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/contact/?id=39