NJ - More victims of the unintended consequences of laws named after dead people
So, now both of these boy's lives are pretty much ruined.
With the security grid and interconnected databases, sex offenders and felons are pretty much shut out of ever landing a decent job, rent, credit, all sorts of government goodies are all shut off to them now.
And people wonder why dealing dope never has any shortage of willing participants?
Prosecutorial Discretion
Wednesday, July 20th, 2011
More victims of the unintended consequences of laws named after dead people
http://www.theagitator.com/2011/07/2...al-discretion/
Teens in horseplay incident must register as sex offenders
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Last updated: Wednesday July 20, 2011, 6:50 AM
BY MARYANN SPOTO
STATE HOUSE BUREAU
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crim...offenders.html
Call it bullying or call it horseplay. Either way, a state appellate court panel says roughhousing with a sexual connotation by a pair of 14-year-old Somerset County boys was a crime that requires them to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives.
In a decision handed down Monday, the three-judge panel acknowledged the severity of its decision, but said it was bound to uphold the law.
"We are keenly aware that our decision may have profound lifelong ramifications for these two boys as well as others similarly situated," Judge Jose Fuentes wrote.
One of the boys, whose case went to trial, said he had sat on the faces of a pair of 12-year-old schoolmates with his bare buttocks in November 2008 "cause I thought it was funny and I was trying to get my friends to laugh," he told a family court judge.
But an act is considered criminal sexual contact if it is done for sexual gratification or to degrade or humiliate the victim, and punishable by lifetime registration — even for juveniles — under Megan's Law, which requires a person convicted of a sex crime against a child to notify police of changes of address or employment.
The trial judge concluded the teenager intended to humiliate or degrade his victims and found him guilty of criminal sexual contact. The second teenager who was implicated pleaded guilty to criminal sexual contact and received the same penalty.
The convictions were appealed, and the attorneys for the teenagers argued their behavior amounted to horseplay, which other appellate court panels had exempted from Megan's Law.
David Fassett, an attorney for the boy who pleaded guilty, argued that the court should not take such a literal view of the law.
"I think the Appellate Division was simply offended by the conduct here and just couldn't get past that issue," he said.
The appeal did not challenge the application of Megan's Law to the 14-year-old youths since courts have already ruled the law applies to offenders as young as 13, but on the ground that the offense was not severe enough to carry a lifelong stigma.
Ronald Chen, the state's former public advocate who is vice dean at Rutgers-Newark Law School, said in an interview that the ruling highlights the "collateral" consequences of Megan's Law.
He said that although the convictions for criminal sexual contact met the law's requirements, "I don't think lifelong registration is a proportionate response."
Chen said that is something the Legislature has to take up.
"It is a very harsh result, and maybe the Legislature should take a look at it," he said.
"But for now, it is what it is."
MaryAnn Spoto is a reporter for The Star-Ledger.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by PaulConventionWV
You and your little girlfriend are sex offenders!
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us