Ron - Announce this week!
Congressman Dr. Paul.
Senator Dr. Paul.
President Dr. Paul.
Has a nice ring to it.
If anybody that matters is reading this, please, convince Ron to announce now.
Let his son's victory settle in and then, maybe on Friday, announce your intention to run for President of the United States in 2012.
The mood of the electorate, the "momentum" is on your side.
"It's a Free Country."
"They hate us for our Freedoms."
"The troops are protecting your Freedom."
You're not nuts! You're FISHERMEN!!!
Good point.
Ron should use this momentum.
A Camel, Lion, and Child.
I've personally spoken with Gary "Veto" Johnson pretty recently and he told me that he intends on running in 2012, regardless of whether Ron Paul runs or not. I think having 2 "libertarian" candidates might hurt each others odds of becoming elected. It would be 2 extra voices in the debates though, which would be a good thing. As much as I love Ron Paul though and as much as I'd love to see him become president, I don't think he's as electable as Gary Johnson. Gary has executive experience, is younger, and I believe has more money.
^^^^yeah right.
some no name is more electable than the father of the tea-party.
Those Who Do Not Move, Do Not Notice Their Chains.
Give it till after the holiday season. If it IS the economy then many factors are involved. TSHTF is a good time to announce.
In America today there remains two factions.
The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist.
Neither of the two dominating political parties belong to the latter.
You can't be one and the other..
I hope he don't run when Ron Runs. Rons the man.Originally Posted by MrRichardson
He got elected twice as a 'Republican" in a very liberal state and under his administration taxes weren't increased for the 1st time in like ever. I love Ron Paul and I love Gary Johnson. I just don't know if having them both running at the same time is helpful or hurtful to the freedom message.
some no name is more electable than the father of the tea-party.
he's a no name...
no one has ever heard of him but you and a handful here.
ron paul has national name recognition, begat a national movement, has an extremely recognizable son in the house.
your fantasy is retarded.
nevertheless---two liberty candidates in debates would be great.
Those Who Do Not Move, Do Not Notice Their Chains.
That's good for GJ.
Do Not Want.
Ron Paul 2012!
"It's a Free Country."
"They hate us for our Freedoms."
"The troops are protecting your Freedom."
You're not nuts! You're FISHERMEN!!!
I think the better scenario for the freedom movement personally would be to have Gary Johnson run in the Republican primaries and have Ron Paul supporting him every step of the way. This away Gary Johnson gets his name out there and we have the successor to Ron Paul. With Gary's executive experience and his history of winning in liberal states, I think he makes a very electable candidate. If he were to not win the Republican nomination, than Ron Paul could run as a 3rd party candidate in the general election. With the money, support, and name recognition we could gather for Dr. Paul, I think he could be a viable 3rd party candidate. This away the freedom message stays active and mainstream for all of 2012 and for consecutive years to come. This is all just my personal opinion though.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote