So I just had this idea pop up in my head today...

Did he introduce his Fed Audit bill too early on? Instead of introducing HR 1207 in the Fall of 2009, what if Ron waited until early 2011, after a possible Republican take-over of the House and/or Senate this year in 2010? Given the fact that all 100+ Congressmen who voted No after co-sponsoring HR 1207 were all Democrats, perhaps the Fed Audit bill would've been successfully passed under a Republican majority in the House?

Plus, if the Fed Audit bill was successfully passed 2011, that would be tremendous political momentum heading into the 2012 campaign season...

I know it's worthless discussing "what ifs", but I just wonder if this was a poor tactical decision made by Dr Paul...