Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Missing the point - immigration

  1. #1

    Missing the point - immigration

    Under a somewhat socialist society (like ours,) money is taken by force from people in the form of taxes and then redistributed. The redistribution is rarely based on the amount of money paid in taxes - this is important. Because you receive largely the same benefits regardless of taxes paid, people who are here illegally and paying next to no taxes receive the same benefits as those paying taxes at the normal rate. What bugs me about many Democrats position is that they like high taxes on wealthy people, which means individual rich people pay vastly more in actual dollars for their use of roads, bridges, and the availability of welfare and public schooling (which they don't even use.) If you decide to redistribute money by force, why is citizenship a factor? It clearly isn't because non-citizens don't pay enough taxes, because the social programs don't take into account how much taxes you pay. A better solution is to simply have people pay their own way, with non-mandatory charity taking up the slack. This is the libertarian position as I see it, and there is no reason non-citizens can't participate.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Clearly. Immigration isn't an area I support Ron Paul on, at all.

  4. #3
    There are other factors to consider than just the forced redistribution of wealth when it comes to immigration. This documentary explores some of these factors:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...26727128068265

  5. #4
    Many people who are in this country illegally do not pay income tax at all. Most of them have no health insurance. But they get health care free. It's federal law that hospitals can not turn them down. Drop by the ER at any hospital in a border state and see what the wait times are like, and then look at who's in there. You won't hear too much English being spoken.

    The government is SUPPOSED to pay the hospitals back for the care they provide to illegals. Two problems with that. One, it doesn't always happen. And two, where did that money come from? You and me, the tax payers.

    There are many problems tied to illegal immigration. Stopping the flood (yes it is a flood. Come down here to the AZ desert and you will see) of illegals will go a long way toward fixing a lot of economic problems. Don't think we'll have people to do "the jobs American's won't do"? Well we got a few million people on Welfare, lets tell them to take a job or the welfare check stops coming. I can go on and on with the problems and solutions to this. But what I mentioned just beings to scratch the surface. If you don't support Ron Paul's immigration policies then you really need to read up on the issue further because you simply don't understand the problems.

  6. #5
    the welfare is busting local and state budgets as well!

    This is the promotion of irresponsible economics.

  7. #6
    Benefits to Employers that Use illegal Labor

    Employers such as contractors who hire them benefit from.............

    1) They never put them on Workmans comp. Insurance which is a huge advantage over contractors who hire Americans.

    2) Never have to worry about matching SSI tax at end of year which is a huge advantage over contractors who hire Americans, and creates a huge deficit in what should actually have been going to the SS pool.

    3) If they are hurt on the job all they need do is drop them off at an emergency room and drive away. See example 1).

    4) A House built under the conditions above sells no cheaper to an American citizen than one built by American Labor. Huge Profits from Illegal labor.

    Myths about Illegal Labor........................

    1) People have a misconception that they work really cheap. They usually draw a cash wage or check ( That Wal-Mart is happy to cash with whatever Id they have) that rivals or exceeds what employers are willing to pay Americans due to the Points above. I know guys who are happy to pay a mexican Illegal $12.00 an hour due to the lack of paper work involved vs. paying an American even $8.00 an hour.

    2) Poor Immigrant families come here for a better life. Fact = It is mainly adult males who come Illegally to work construction jobs. Go to Wal-Mart after day working hours and see how many mexican males vs. mexican females are there. All you will see shopping and following your 12 year daughters around with bad intent are mexican males. try it, be honest. What do you see?

    3) Americans will not do this work. Bull$#@!. Fact = This myth is propagated by the people that wish to hire Illegals due to the lack of paperwork and taxes they have to deal with in hiring Americans.

    Disadvantages to American Citizens caused by Illegals....................

    1) Illegals working in America effects the poor more than anyone else negatively and thats why the government doesn't care to fix the problem.

    2) It may be that some Americans actually benefit from not working due to benefits received from welfare programs as opposed to competing with Illegals due to the disparity in wages caused by government red tape. American $8.00 an Hour compared to tax free Illegal $12.00 an hour. The benefits often outweigh the wage. The poor aren't stupid in feeling this way.

    3) I hear that Illegals also qualify for welfare benefits to. So they are crippling the system on both sides of the argument above.

    Feel free to to add to this list for me.
    Last edited by Dieseler; 12-28-2007 at 12:43 PM.

  8. #7
    At this point I think I've heard most of the arguments against immigration, and they're all utilitarian arguments (I'm not a utilitarian) with sprinkles of xenophobia. The way to deal with the issue, it seems to me, is to deny benefits to immigrants (legal or otherwise), unless they're user fee based. That should take care of the utilitarian arguments. As a libertarian, I can't support closed borders, and unlike my friend Walter Block, I don't see it as a gray area for libertarians.

    BTW, anyone interested in this discussion is welcome to check out a thead I started in Mises.com:

    http://mises.com/forums/t/854.aspx

    Be sure though to read the entire thing...lots of twists and turns.
    Last edited by RK Cowan; 12-28-2007 at 01:58 PM.

  9. #8
    Anyone dealing in the real world rather than some theoretical bubble should realize that completely open borders would result in the election of a socialist government within a generation. The planet adds a net of 80 million people per year, mostly in the third world. We can't make a dent in that number through immigration. All we can manage to do is wreck everything this nation has built up in our history if we keep the floodgates wide open.

    It is depressing that Democrats, libertarians, and neoconservatives all want defacto open borders. I don't expect the government to shape American culture, language and traditions. But I do expect them not to purposely destroy traditional America by deliberately altering the composition of the nation in order to pave the way for some form of world government by watering down any resistance to it.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by RK Cowan View Post
    Clearly. Immigration isn't an area I support Ron Paul on, at all.
    Wait, why? Ron Paul is against welfare in general.
    "You know not what you are given, but forever will you know what has been taken away from you..."

    "As long as we live beyond our means we are destined to live beneath our means." - Ron Paul at a CNBC Debate in Michigan (10/09/07)

  12. #10
    I continually argue about immigration with Ron Paul supporters and always give the same answer. IMO, you're blaming the wrong people and coming up with a solution that punishes people who've done nothing wrong. RP says he believes in the libertarian non-aggression principle, that people should be free to do what they wish so long as they are not aggressing against others. Immigrants are not aggressing against anyone.

    If you think "illegals" are taking advantage of the welfare state, deny them access to it. Problem solved. But you're problem isn't with the immigrants but the welfare state and those who enforce it. Unless you're problem really is the immigrants themselves, that they pose a threat in some other, unspoken, way. Given the recent TNR story, it certainly makes me wonder what is really going on here.
    Last edited by RK Cowan; 01-09-2008 at 10:22 AM.

  13. #11
    Illegal means illegal. Deport them.

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by RK Cowan View Post
    I continually argue about immigration with Ron Paul supporters and always give the same answer. IMO, you're blaming the wrong people and coming up with a solution that punishes people who've done nothing wrong. RP says he believes in the libertarian non-aggression principle, that people should be free to do what they wish so long as they are not aggressing against others. Immigrants are not aggressing against anyone.

    If you think "illegals" are taking advantage of the welfare state, deny them access to it. Problem solved. But you're problem isn't with the immigrants but the welfare state and those who enforce it. Unless you're problem really is the immigrants themselves, that they pose a threat in some other, unspoken, way. Given the recent TNR story, it certainly makes me wonder what is really going on here.
    Oh hell, these immigrants really aren't so bad,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDUIx...eature=related

    What ya think about that?

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Wasbeer View Post
    If you decide to redistribute money by force, why is citizenship a factor? It clearly isn't because non-citizens don't pay enough taxes, because the social programs don't take into account how much taxes you pay. A better solution is to simply have people pay their own way, with non-mandatory charity taking up the slack. This is the libertarian position as I see it, and there is no reason non-citizens can't participate.
    it's not about illegal immigrants. its impossible to tell an illegal immigrant from a legal one without a national id card. illegal immigrants come from all continents. people just don't want mexican looking people hanging around in their neighborhoods.

  16. #14
    A better solution is to simply have people pay their own way, with non-mandatory charity taking up the slack. This is the libertarian position as I see it, and there is no reason non-citizens can't participate.
    I'd agree that the problem is welfare, not immigration itself.

    As a true libertarian, I support open borders.

    Anyone dealing in the real world rather than some theoretical bubble should realize that completely open borders would result in the election of a socialist government within a generation.
    If we had open borders and migrants come here and voted, their vote is protected by free speech. To deny immigration because of the speech or expression of these people is tantamount to censorship.


    people just don't want mexican looking people hanging around in their neighborhoods.
    Under a libertarian system there's nothing they can do. Looking Mexican is protected by freedom of expression.

  17. #15
    My uncle used to live in a decent middle class neighborhood. I went to his house for christmas the other day and the area he lived in looked like little mexico. You know the cop cars everywhere and run down business or no business what soever in the neighborhood. His neighbors were illegals that came here had a anchor baby and now stay here living on the system. These illegals are living in a hud home for free with electricity and all bills paid for. This house is a nice middle class home which would cost me about 1600 a month to maintain with mortage and bills. These people were telling him they were going to have 7 kids because they make more money per kid. This here is the problem with this damn country and the government is actually rewarding illegal and stupid behavior while taxing me 3.5k a month and I can barely afford to live. The government needs to reevaluate wealth because as far as I am concerned that person is alot more wealthy than me. I define being rich as the time that You can actually not work ever again and never have to worry about paying You're bills ever again. This is pathetic because the middle class has to worry about lay offs and medical disasters every year while these As&holes don't have to worry about crap. All I can say is if the economy crashes and one of these people not getting a check again try to break into my house I will have no problems putting them down. I should feel sorry for saying that but I do not feel sorry and I really feel its my moral right to do that because I have been oppressed by this evil taxation and welfare system. Kinda funny what the bible says because the book of revelations is starting to become a reality and the people that deny it must be the most ignorant people on earth.

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by RK Cowan View Post
    I continually argue about immigration with Ron Paul supporters and always give the same answer. IMO, you're blaming the wrong people and coming up with a solution that punishes people who've done nothing wrong. RP says he believes in the libertarian non-aggression principle, that people should be free to do what they wish so long as they are not aggressing against others. Immigrants are not aggressing against anyone.

    If you think "illegals" are taking advantage of the welfare state, deny them access to it. Problem solved. But you're problem isn't with the immigrants but the welfare state and those who enforce it. Unless you're problem really is the immigrants themselves, that they pose a threat in some other, unspoken, way. Given the recent TNR story, it certainly makes me wonder what is really going on here.
    You can't wax poetic all you like, but the proof is in the pudding. Your ideals, which MANY libertarians do not bulge on, are like armchair generals. Never practical, only theoretical.

    You create circular arguments. Nobody denies that the government and its policies are to blame, but you cannot relinquish ALL responsibility from those who come here illegally. See, you are basing your theories off of your beliefts - that nobody is really illegal. That is where things run amock. Theoretical vs. practical. They are illegal, they are breaking the law. SO, as an american citizen I do have a right to be upset. I do have a right that somene knowingly steals from the mouths and resources from my fellow countrymen. BECAUSE, the government is corrupt and MY countrymen are not represented, therefore I can put some blame on the illegals.

    I cannot wave away any responsibility from a thief because someone leaves their windows open, and the police are slow to respond.

    If I had my druthers, round them all up and ship them the phuk out. Sorry. Just how I feel. Lets do it LEGALLY and by the book. You know, the rules.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    I hope Ron Paul does secure the borders and then allows open immigration. That way illegal immigration will be classified as legal and the problem would be solved.

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by RK Cowan View Post
    At this point I think I've heard most of the arguments against immigration, and they're all utilitarian arguments (I'm not a utilitarian) with sprinkles of xenophobia.
    This is basically the argument of the past 70 years of egalitarians against genetic determinists.

    Egalitarians believe that illegal immigrants are poorly educated and willing to break the law because they're poor and have no opportunities back home. They're of the opinion that public education and a job will likely turn the children of these criminals into model citizens.

    Genetic determinists believe that illegal immigrants are poorly educated because they lack the ability, and willing to break the law for mutual reasons. They're of the opinion that the children of these criminals are unlikely to become model citizens no matter the opportunities given to them because they lack the ability to compete in a free society.


    I'm not sure what the utilitarian argument has to do with the immigration question. You might very well be advocating negative utilitarianism.

  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Dieseler View Post
    Oh hell, these immigrants really aren't so bad,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDUIx...eature=related

    What ya think about that?
    They need to be sending them to Iraq.

  23. #20
    Supporting Member
    North Carolina



    Posts
    2,946
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    I believe the libertarian argument for open borders is flawed. Sure, government handouts and freebies are also problems but it runs deeper than that.

    Imagine for example that the we have made the united States into a libertarian utopia in the future. Government is extremely limited, taxes are so low they are hardly noticeable, and militarily we aren't involved in other countries' wars. Now lets assume we had closed borders until we achieved this utopia, but we decide to open the borders completely. Anyone from any country can come here and is immediately granted citizenship and the ability to vote.

    It would probably take less than a year for our utopia to be destroyed. Millions, maybe a billion + people would descend into the country, many from countries that have never known the least bit of freedom.

    We have to realize that most of the world is happy to live in tyranny. Most of the history of the world has been a picture of a man with his boot on the throat of another man. People do NOT cherish liberty! More often than not people are very willing to live under the domination of some despot or dictator, or at least a 'republic' so corrupt its not distinguishable from a dictatorship. Just look at our own United States and see how few percentage of the populace support Ron Paul. People will put up with anything.

    With open borders China could send 500 million people here for political conquest. And who could stop them? They'd have a right to vote and be citizens. More than likely they would tear down everything we worked so hard to build.

    In an ideal world-if men actually yearned to be free, sure we could have open borders. But the truth is that men have no problem with their own slavery, and we need to be discerning of who we allow to be citizens in this country. What we don't need are more statists, socialists and looters. But unfortunately, that's most of the rest of the world. Hell, we have enough of them in our own country.

  24. #21
    It would probably take less than a year for our utopia to be destroyed. Millions, maybe a billion + people would descend into the country, many from countries that have never known the least bit of freedom.
    How do you know for sure? Most Americans are anti-freedom anyway. That is why just about no one votes for the Libertarian Party.

    Using this argument, we should deport all people who are against freedom. If someone argued that they should not be deported, the argument can be made if they are not deported, the country will become non-libertarian.

    And why not believe that immigrants are more likely to cherish freedom? If they come to America they may do so because they want more freedom. They may be escaping dictatorship. When my grandparents moved to America from Europe they were escaping the tyrannical European monarchy.

    Just look at our own United States and see how few percentage of the populace support Ron Paul. People will put up with anything.
    A good way to fix this is to deport anyone who doesn't support Ron Paul. That'll teach them. Deport the Huckabee supporters especially. Then we block the borders and let in only Ron Paul supports from other countries. That will guarantee the preservation of freedom.

    Even if you block immigration, you will still have problems when people within the country decide to turn towards socialism, and many do. Babies born to American parents may be very likely in this day and age to turn to socialism, but is that an argument for compulsory euthanasia?

    In order to tinker with the minds of the people, to make them accept freedom, you are advocating socialist-style intervention.

    The problem is that libertarianism and democracy don't mix. I think if individual liberty were fixed, that would be preferable. A constitution that makes it difficult for freedom to be eroded needs to be set up.
    Last edited by norak; 02-03-2008 at 01:33 AM.

  25. #22
    Supporting Member
    North Carolina



    Posts
    2,946
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Quote Originally Posted by norak
    And why not believe that immigrants are more likely to cherish freedom? If they come to America they may do so because they want more freedom. They may be escaping dictatorship. When my grandparents moved to America from Europe they were escaping the tyrannical European monarchy.
    Our own Declaration of Independence states that "....accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed."

    Besides that, if we have completely open borders, we are open to political conquest. Already, Mexico tells its citizens to go to the United States and vote Mexican interests. While Mexico doesn't have a high enough population to conquer the US politically outright, China sure does.

    Look, I'm not advocating deporting people who who want to take away our rights. I simply believe we should be very careful who we allow to vote-that's all. Voting allows you to control other peoples' lives and money. We shouldn't give that privilege out so lightly.

  26. #23
    Re: Free healthcare, education

    If a thief steals from you and gives it to someone else, go after the thief, not the beneficiary.

    Flawed analogy, I know, if you paid your taxes last year they didn't really "steal it"--you voluntarily handed them your money KNOWING where it would be going.

  27. #24
    The "welfare state" argument against immigration is not based on fact. Most studies show that immigrants pay more in taxes than they use in services. Even studies done by anti-immigrant groups show costs which compared the the size of the economy are relatively small.

    We are still a nation of immigrants whether the xenophobes like it or not.

    Illegal Immigrants are Paying a Lot More Taxes Than You Think
    Eight million illegals pay Social Security, Medicare, and income taxes


    Immigration's Costs -- And Benefits

    Researchers disagree on illegal immigrant cost-benefit analysis



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    I'll admit something to you. My parents were Irish. They once told me that when they came to America they received immense hardship from the mainly Anglo-Saxon population and at one point thought about moving to Australia where the population was more Celtic. We often holiday in Australia nowadays.

    My parents tell me that what the Mexicans are experiencing today is no different. Xenophobia seems to happen to everyone, the Italians, the Jews, etc.

    When our ancestors fled Europe they were escaping oppression from monarchy. Luckily for my ancestors America open its doors so the victims of oppression could experience freedom. This is just a personal feeling, but I would want that same treatment to be expressed to today's victims of oppression, whether they are escaping from Chinese Communism, Fascist Russia, or North Korea. If it weren't for the openness of American borders I wouldn't be here, and I'm sure about 95 per cent of Americans here wouldn't either.

    Already, Mexico tells its citizens to go to the United States and vote Mexican interests. While Mexico doesn't have a high enough population to conquer the US politically outright, China sure does.
    Think about it this way. Hillary Clinton telling Democrats to vote for Democrat interests is no different to ex-Chinese immigrants voting for their collective interests.

    You will always have groups voting for policies that go against your beliefs.

    In a dictatorship, you suppress these people through extermination, destroying roads so they cannot vote, or deporting them.

    In a free country, you must let them talk and you must let them vote.

    What will most likely end up happening is that these Chinese people will end up not voting for Chinese interests but instead will vote for their own individual interests. Coalitions are difficult to sustain because of individual self-interest.
    Last edited by norak; 02-09-2008 at 08:59 AM.

  30. #26
    How does Mexico deal with "illegal immigrants" in Mexico? We could/should take some cues from Mexico's immigration law.<IMHO>
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Slagle/john18.htm



Similar Threads

  1. The GOP Establishment is missing the point (again)
    By SonofThunder in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-14-2012, 03:08 PM
  2. Missing the Point on Assassinations
    By tribute_13 in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 10-05-2011, 11:42 AM
  3. Tea Parties missing the point
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-16-2009, 03:16 PM
  4. Missing the Point, Y'all
    By georgiaboy in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-10-2008, 11:13 AM
  5. Are we missing a huge point K.I.S.S
    By magicmike in forum Advertising Projects
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2008, 10:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •