Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Why was the atomic bombing of Japan not necessary?

  1. #1

    Default Why was the atomic bombing of Japan not necessary?

    I've always known that the reason the U.S. bombed Nagasaki was because even after they had been bombed Hiroshima, the emperor had declined to surrender. How is it that I've heard at 2:30...

    YouTube - SA@TAC - Terrorism, Liberal and Conservative

    If you're not willing to surrender even after the use of the greatest weapon of warfare, how can you be ready to surrender prior to its use? And yes they were given an opportunity, see Postdam Declaration
    Last edited by Free Moral Agent; 02-16-2010 at 03:07 PM.


  2. Remove this section of ads by registering or logging in. Forget your password? Click here.


  3. #2

    Default

    It wasn't necessary because Japan's emperor saying "I surrender" wouldn't have changed that we just sent all of their aircraft carriers to the bottom of the pacific.

    The US already won the war and then used terrorist tactics to get a complete surrender.

  4. #3

    Default

    as an expert in Japanese animation, i wholeheartedly say no
    Rick Simpson Hemp Oil - Phoenix Tears

    We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false. -- William Casey, CIA Director

    Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- Mark Twain

    When people like us-- the scum of society-- don't risk our lives when a rare chance comes our way, we become losers at that moment. So courage is the only thing we can rely on.-- Anchan

  5. #4

    Default

    There was a near coup by the military that was thwarted.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ky%C5%ABj%C5%8D_Incident

    The Kyūjō Incident (宮城事件, Kyūjō Jiken?) was an attempted military coup d'état in Japan at the end of the Second World War. It happened on the night of 14 August 1945 – 15 August 1945, just prior to announcement of Japan's surrender to the Allies. The attempted coup was put into effect by the Staff Office of the Ministry of War of Japan and by many from the Imperial Guard of Japan in order to stop the move to surrender.

    The officers, in an attempt to block the decision to surrender to the Allies, killed Lieutenant General Takeshi Mori of the First Imperial Guards Division and attempted to counterfeit an order to the effect of occupying the Tokyo Imperial Palace. They attempted to place the Emperor under house-arrest, using the 2nd Brigade Imperial Guard Infantry. They failed to persuade the Eastern District Army (Japan) and the high command of the Imperial Japanese Army to move forward with the action. Due to their failure to convince the remaining army to oust the Imperial House of Japan, they ultimately committed suicide in traditional Japanese form. As a result, the communique of the intent for a Japanese surrender continued as planned.
    While I frown up the demolition of Nagasaki, you have to be extremely naive to think that the fiercely honor bound Japanese would have just let the American forces stroll onto their islands without incredible resistance.
    Last edited by AuH20; 02-16-2010 at 03:29 PM.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,091
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Ok, so we sank all their ships. Then we go home?

    What are they doing in the mean time? Rebuilding their empire? Rebuilding their military? Giving haven to Germans, and using the German's technology to build atomic bombs too?

    Nahh, they'd just stop if we did.

    It was our fault they invaded China. Sorry Japan, our bad. We forced you to take over half the Pacific. You guys didn't want to do it.

    >:S
    We accept both kinds of political theories here; No government and Anarchy. Ronpaulforums.com "Big Tent"

  7. #6

    Default

    the terms of surrender demanded at Potsdam were significantly less than those accepted following the bombings. in fact, many have argued that the Japanese would have surrendered under the terms they had agreed to if these had been offered previous to dropping the atomic bombs.

  8. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Promontorium View Post
    Ok, so we sank all their ships. Then we go home?

    What are they doing in the mean time? Rebuilding their empire? Rebuilding their military? Giving haven to Germans, and using the German's technology to build atomic bombs too?

    Nahh, they'd just stop if we did.

    It was our fault they invaded China. Sorry Japan, our bad. We forced you to take over half the Pacific. You guys didn't want to do it.

    >:S
    The war should have never escalated to that point (reference FDR - Tojo Doctrine). But I agree. You finish the damn thing after exhausting countless lives, dollars and resources. Secondly, why apply moral standards to an act which purely immoral? War is hell and should be avoided at all costs, but at the same time, I understand the burdensome choice Truman made.
    Last edited by AuH20; 02-16-2010 at 03:23 PM.

  9. #8

  10. #9

    Default

    I think the bombing was necessary, it outweighed the cost of losing millions on an invasion of the Japanese homeland.

  11. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quinn Rogness View Post
    I think the bombing was necessary, it outweighed the cost of losing millions on an invasion of the Japanese homeland.
    SA is awesome!

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •