Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Winter Olympics Nationalism

  1. #1

    Winter Olympics Nationalism

    I dislike the strengthening of nationalism that comes through the Winter Olympics. Increased nationalism emotions can and has been used to murder millions through war. In addition, nationalism in the games has led to judging and voting frauds.

    The individual athlete should be the focus of the games, not a collective.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

  4. #3
    I dislike it too, but you should look at the olympics as the pinnacle of individual achievement in athletics. It's unfortunate that nationalism often overwhelms the spirit of the games, but it's easy to ignore it by not watching the commercials. In my experience, there's less nationalist chauvinism in the games than in the daily news.

    edit: Just started watching on my local affiliate. Some kick ass action from everyone! Apollo Ono rocked as usual. Looking forward to freestyle snowboarding-especially if Shaun White made it back this year.
    Last edited by heavenlyboy34; 02-13-2010 at 09:11 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Torchbearer
    what works can never be discussed online. there is only one language the government understands, and until the people start speaking it by the magazine full... things will remain the same.
    Hear/buy my music here "government is the enemy of liberty"-RP Support me on Patreon here Ephesians 6:12

  5. #4
    Why can't I possibly relish in both the achievement of the individual, and also the pride of having my country pummel the competition? You are presenting a false dichotomy if you assume that if you think the collective is important, the individual can't be. I think both are equally ultimate. Individuals define the collective, and the individual is meaningless apart from his/her association in the collective.
    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
    Quote Originally Posted by GK Chesterton
    It is often supposed that when people stop believing in God, they believe in nothing. Alas, it is worse than that. When they stop believing in God, they believe in anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke
    Nothing is so fatal to religion as indifference.

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by nate895 View Post
    Why can't I possibly relish in both the achievement of the individual, and also the pride of having my country pummel the competition? You are presenting a false dichotomy if you assume that if you think the collective is important, the individual can't be. I think both are equally ultimate. Individuals define the collective, and the individual is meaningless apart from his/her association in the collective.
    Because "your country" doesn't do anything in the olympics-a group of individuals do. Feeling nationalistic pride in others' achievements is as absurd as city pride because your hometown team beat the "away" team. Besides, it's not good for your psyche to get into a nationalist fervor.
    Quote Originally Posted by Torchbearer
    what works can never be discussed online. there is only one language the government understands, and until the people start speaking it by the magazine full... things will remain the same.
    Hear/buy my music here "government is the enemy of liberty"-RP Support me on Patreon here Ephesians 6:12

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by heavenlyboy34 View Post
    Because "your country" doesn't do anything in the olympics-a group of individuals do. Besides, it's not good for your psyche to get into a nationalist fervor.
    Those individuals are defined, in part, by the fact they are representing the United States. I don't think you understand the epistemological problems that must result from your atomism. The individual cannot be known apart from the group of which he/she is a member.

    The individual is defined, in great part, by the groups they are a part of. You can't know anything about anything else at all if you cannot know what unites it with the other things, and you cannot know anything if you do not know what distinguishes the individual.
    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
    Quote Originally Posted by GK Chesterton
    It is often supposed that when people stop believing in God, they believe in nothing. Alas, it is worse than that. When they stop believing in God, they believe in anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke
    Nothing is so fatal to religion as indifference.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by nate895 View Post
    Those individuals are defined, in part, by the fact they are representing the United States. I don't think you understand the epistemological problems that must result from your atomism. The individual cannot be known apart from the group of which he/she is a member.

    The individual is defined, in great part, by the groups they are a part of. You can't know anything about anything else at all if you cannot know what unites it with the other things, and you cannot know anything if you do not know what distinguishes the individual.
    You make the classic mistake of conflating the need for the state with man's need for society. These are two entirely different things. Noone would deny that humans are social animals. Numerous studies show that humans do not develop properly without a stable society. This does not beget a need for nationalism-or even the nation-State.
    Quote Originally Posted by Torchbearer
    what works can never be discussed online. there is only one language the government understands, and until the people start speaking it by the magazine full... things will remain the same.
    Hear/buy my music here "government is the enemy of liberty"-RP Support me on Patreon here Ephesians 6:12

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by heavenlyboy34 View Post
    You make the classic mistake of conflating the need for the state with man's need for society. These are two entirely different things. Noone would deny that humans are social animals. Numerous studies show that humans do not develop properly without a stable society. This does not beget a need for nationalism-or even the nation-State.
    That wasn't what I was saying. Both you and mediahasyou are arguing that the individual is the ultimate, and I am saying that both the individual and the collective (the state being only one manifestation of the collective) are ultimate, otherwise knowledge is impossible.
    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
    Quote Originally Posted by GK Chesterton
    It is often supposed that when people stop believing in God, they believe in nothing. Alas, it is worse than that. When they stop believing in God, they believe in anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke
    Nothing is so fatal to religion as indifference.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    call me a nationalist, but I think the Olympics are good things.
    "You know not what you are given, but forever will you know what has been taken away from you..."

    "As long as we live beyond our means we are destined to live beneath our means." - Ron Paul at a CNBC Debate in Michigan (10/09/07)

  12. #10
    There is nothing wrong with friendly competition. Saying that the Olympics is not a reason for Government is one thing, not understanding that people will always have a champion is another thing. Call it nationalism if you want but take note of this... If in high school you cheered for the opposing football team it is no wonder you got beat up and were not liked, and live with the fact that you are a fraud.

    If the truth however happens to be that you just don't enjoy sports well then STFU and go do whatever it is you do.

    I'll be happy for all winners, but I will feel pride for eveyone of them that came from the same country I did. It's just part of knowing who you are and where you come from.
    Libertarians - trying to improve the world through ideas and free markets rather than legislation and prisons.

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by nate895 View Post
    That wasn't what I was saying. Both you and mediahasyou are arguing that the individual is the ultimate, and I am saying that both the individual and the collective (the state being only one manifestation of the collective) are ultimate, otherwise knowledge is impossible.
    I would agree that society is important to the health and general welfare of the individual, but not the State. Society and knowledge both predate the State by a LONG shot-several millenia, if memory serves.
    Quote Originally Posted by Torchbearer
    what works can never be discussed online. there is only one language the government understands, and until the people start speaking it by the magazine full... things will remain the same.
    Hear/buy my music here "government is the enemy of liberty"-RP Support me on Patreon here Ephesians 6:12

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by heavenlyboy34 View Post
    I would agree that society is important to the health and general welfare of the individual, but not the State. Society and knowledge both predate the State by a LONG shot-several millenia, if memory serves.
    Your talking about health and well-being, what I am talking about is a matter of ethics, metaphysics, and epistemology. You are granting the individual a higher ontology than the oneness of the collective, when both must be equally ultimate in order to make sense out of ethics, epistemology, and metaphysics. BTW, "society and knowledge" do not predate the state by that long in my worldview.
    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
    Quote Originally Posted by GK Chesterton
    It is often supposed that when people stop believing in God, they believe in nothing. Alas, it is worse than that. When they stop believing in God, they believe in anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke
    Nothing is so fatal to religion as indifference.



Similar Threads

  1. Putin invites Snowden to Winter Olympics in Sochi
    By qh4dotcom in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-22-2014, 09:54 PM
  2. Jamaican Bobsleigh Team Raises $25k in Dogecoin 4 Winter Olympics
    By FSP-Rebel in forum Bitcoin / Cryptocurrencies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-20-2014, 12:24 PM
  3. Winter Olympics Wimp-out: Is Obama Afraid of Putin?
    By HAC in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-27-2013, 09:57 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-07-2013, 09:16 PM
  5. Boycott Winter Olympics in Russia, senator (Lindsey Graham)suggests
    By Origanalist in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 07-17-2013, 06:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •