Im all for the noninterventionalist foreign policy, but there is something that has puzzled me for a while on this. Yes i know American troops should be used for the defense of our nation, but when another sect, or a government is trying to wipe out a certain group, genocide or ethnic clensing, can anyone really sit here and say that a nation that was founded on Christian principles should sit by and watch as hundreds of thousands are slaughtered, just for their beliefs?? This is puzzling to me because looking at Machiavelli and Mills and other writers, I can agree that a people will respect and cherish their freedom more if they fight for it and have their own countrymen die along side of them for this freedom, but when people have nothing to defend themselves with, and are being slaughtered without any defense, how can they accomplish this? Is it really that wrong to step in and stop these horrible things from happenening, while still not intervening in their countries?
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us