Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Wesley Clark Says Neocons Plan To Overthrow 7 countries in the next 5 years.

  1. #1

    Angry Wesley Clark Says Neocons Plan To Overthrow 7 countries in the next 5 years.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB3bJb4w3JY

    This is an Excerpt from an Interview given by Amy Goodman from Democracy Now. She spends an hour with retired four-star General Wesley Clark. Here is a snippet of what he has to say about the War on Iraq, and the wars we may see in the future.

    ...About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second." I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?" He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said, "No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments." And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."

    So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" -- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!"

    AMY GOODMAN: I'm sorry. What did you say his name was?

    GEN. WESLEY CLARK: I'm not going to give you his name.

    AMY GOODMAN: So, go through the countries again.

    GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and back to Iran.
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Now if you look at this letter from Project for a New American Century, you will see they have been planning the Iraq war for many many years (probably before 1998!):
    http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm. Look at the men who wrote the letter and are subsequently part of PNAC:
    - Donald Rumsfeld
    - Paul Wolfowitz - Former United States Deputy Secretary of Defense during the administration of President George W. Bush, he was a principal "architect" of the Iraq War. On June 1, 2005 he was appointed president of the World Bank Group, but resigned on May 17, 2007.
    - Robert P. Zoellick - United States Deputy Secretary of State, resigning on July 7, 2006. Before holding this position, he served as U.S. Trade Representative, from February 7, 2001 until February 22, 2005. President George W. Bush nominated Zoellick on May 30, 2007 to replace Paul Wolfowitz as President of the World Bank. The nomination is subject to approval by the Bank's Board of Directors

    The World Bank thing is kinda funny. Small world, huh? Anyways that's not really my point. My point is the Iraq war was being planned at least back in the 90s and the men who planned it - as luck would have it - are now in power. Wesley Clark proved further in his discussion that the Iraq war was not about taking out a country who is a threat to America....are the other six countries a threat to America? If they are then I ask, why? Perhaps Ron Paul might accuse our "bad foreign policy". No other reason I can think of.

    Of course these countries aren't threats to us, especially if we can take them all out in 5 years. The motive behind these neocon globalists is control, that's all I can think of.

    Maybe some of you guys can shed some light on this.



  • #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Muskegon, MI
    Posts
    6,676

    Default

    Didnt we send some missiles into Somalia this week? This all seems to true

  • #3

    Default

    That's a bit scary, but I trust the American people won't let them.

    And guess what, if they do, it will all be in America's name. The outside world won't see it as neo-cons screwing them, they will see that America is screwing them. "And if we ignore that, we ignore that at our own risk"

  • #4

    Default

    Yes, the government did send some missiles into Somalia a few days ago. It had also been funding the Ethiopian group that is trying to overthrow the current Somalian government for several months and I guess our government's still doing that.

    anti-neocons.com
    a forum for discussion about the activities of the US government,
    especially those of the known neo-conservative leaders.
    anti-war.com
    excelent source of news about the Iraq war,
    especially news little discussed in the old media (main stream media).
    The Philosophy of Liberty

  • #5

    Default

    The whole plan is true, its out there to read by anyone who wants too. The neoconservatives are very dangerous to the world and to our liberty. Most of the establishment Democrats have the same policy. When they are talking about their war on a tactic (terrorism) going on for generations they are dead serious. Do you think America will ever be the same after that?

    The decision to effect regime change in Iraq became official policy during the Clinton Administration, I guess 911 gave them a opportunity to do it.
    The original American patriots were those individuals brave enough to resist with force the oppressive power of King George. I accept the definition of patriotism as that effort to resist oppressive state power. The true patriot is motivated by a sense of responsibility, and out of self interest -- for himself, his family, and the future of his country -- to resist government abuse of power. He rejects the notion that patriotism means obedience to the state.

    Congressman Ron Paul 5/22/07

  • #6

    Default the five years are up

    Hmmm, 2001 - that was six years ago. Seems their little agenda got slowed
    down a little or even stopped. Too bad our military had to pay the ultimate price for it.

    Lynn

  • #7

    Default

    Clinton Authorized regime change in Iraq in 1998 too, right?

  • #8

    Default

    I've been saying for years that a better policy would be to disengage, bring our troops home, and concentrate on rebuilding our economy.

    But, we say very clearly to the world that any terrorist acts perpetrated against American and Americans, wherever they may be, will be met with the most devastating consequences.

    We especially should communicate to nation-states that are known to support terrorism that if a major terrorist act is traced to a group that has received aid comfort from their government, that their government and their military forces will be destroyed, period.

    In street talk, the message would be, "Look, we're gonna leave you alone, but if you decide it's a good idea to mess with us at any point in the future, we are going to unload so much whup-ass on you, that you will wish you had never been born."

    But we don't go around intervening nor occupying other countries.

  • #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NMCB3 View Post
    The whole plan is true, its out there to read by anyone who wants too. The neoconservatives are very dangerous to the world and to our liberty. Most of the establishment Democrats have the same policy. When they are talking about their war on a tactic (terrorism) going on for generations they are dead serious. Do you think America will ever be the same after that?

    The decision to effect regime change in Iraq became official policy during the Clinton Administration, I guess 911 gave them a opportunity to do it.
    It is time to effect a regime change here. These people are nuts.
    Viva La Ron Paul Revolution.

  • #10

    Default

    I can't blame Iran for wanting nukes. If Pakistan did'nt have em' we would have invaded them as well. Where did he go? That slippery Osamma that we gave a 2 month head start to.

  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •