Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: House judiciary committee recommends impeachment of convicted federal judge

  1. #1

    House judiciary committee recommends impeachment of convicted federal judge

    http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchas...recommends.php

    [JURIST] The US House Judiciary Committee [official website] voted [recorded video, RealPlayer] 29-0 Wednesday to approve four articles of impeachment [text] against US district court judge Samuel Kent [official profile] based on his conviction [JURIST report] for obstruction of justice [18 USC 1512(c)(2) text] in connection with the alleged sexual harassment of his secretary and former case manager. The articles charged that Kent had "engaged in conduct ... incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a judge," "corruptly obstructed, influenced, or impeded an official proceeding," and "made material false and misleading statements ... to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation," and were recommended to the committee [recorded video, RealPlayer] by a special subcommittee on Tuesday. Kent had tendered his resignation [JURIST report] to President Barack Obama effective June 2010, but a disciplinary panel from the Fifth Circuit has urged [certification letter, PDF; JURIST report] that he be removed more promptly. The articles now go to the full House of Representatives, and if approved, would result in the first impeachment of a federal judge in over 20 years.

    In February, Kent pleaded guilty to lying to a judicial panel [Fifth Circuit materials] investigating sexual harassment allegations made by his former case manager and legal secretary. He was sentenced [JURIST report] in May to 33 months in prison and ordered to pay a $1,000 fine and $6,500 in restitution as part of his plea agreement [text, PDF]. In 2007, the American Bar Association (ABA) [professional association] adopted new policies reforming the Model Code of Judicial Conduct [JURIST report], which for the first time included prohibitions against sexual harassment, although some advocacy groups believe these changes do not go far enough [AP report].



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Ya that judge was a d-bag. They are impeaching him because he is trying to squeeze another years salary out while he is in jail. On top of that he got out of being branded as a sex offender. He has on of Houston's top attorney defending him.
    If you don't live you life on the edge, you will never see the view



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-21-2019, 01:26 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2014, 08:33 PM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-29-2013, 12:29 AM
  4. Changes in House Committee on the Judiciary?
    By tangent4ronpaul in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-19-2008, 06:38 PM
  5. Dennis Kucinich testifies before House Judiciary Committee [video]
    By RadiantBlueLight in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-25-2008, 10:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •