I went to the new site, and submitted A QUESTION.
I asked...
(NOT EXACT TEXT.. ronpaulhawaii deleted my other post... but this is basically the same question...)
--------------
Sir, the constitution is not in effect, and has not been since 1933.
Will you, say publically, that you support its restoration as the rule of law?
Will you say publically, that you will work to end the states of emergecy imposed in 1933, which has usured it?
Because when you take office, you must swear an oath to uphold, defend and protect that constitution.
Which.. since you know it is not in effect and has not been for 80 years... if you take that oath, and do not actively take steps to restore it as law then you sir would technically, by definition, be a traitor to your oath and the constitution.
Which is it?
Will you work to restore it as law by fighting to end the emergencies?
or will you join the conspiracy which has urusped it?
-MEMAT
-----------
i just sent it... and of course, have no idea if he will even see it.
let alone respond.
But...
like Adam kokesh... if he will not take a stand in defence of the constitution.. to restore it as law once again.
then he is just a politician, who is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
but.. I give him time to think about it, and hopefully respond.
I suggest the rest of you, ask the same question.
pressuming you care about the constituition.
-MEMAT
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us