Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: America will not protect us, warns Rudd

  1. #1

    America will not protect us, warns Rudd

    THE Rudd Government has acknowledged that the supremacy of the US has begun to fade and Australia is preparing for an uncertain future in which it can no longer rely on the protection of its main ally.

    In a fundamental shift in defence plans, the Government has explicitly declared that US primacy in the Asia-Pacific - the bedrock of the nation's security since World War II - may be ending. The change, caused by the rise of new great powers such as China, is set to produce growing regional tensions and a "sudden deterioration" in Australia's security.

    A 20-year defence blueprint, to be released by the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, today, prepares for a multibillion-dollar build-up of naval and air forces to ensure that Australia can defend its northern and sea approaches.

    It says a regional shake-up is under way but US supremacy will not be blunted before 2030 and assesses the chances of an attack on Australia in the short term as "very remote".

  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    i was just listening to the something similar in the "New American Foundation"

    YouTube - America's Fate in the Coming Era of Chinese Hegemony
    The accumulated filth of all their sex & murder will foam up about their waists & all the whores & politicians will look up & shout "Save us!"... & I'll look down and whisper "No."

  4. #3

    China's navy
    Distant horizons

    Apr 23rd 2009 | QINGDAO
    From The Economist print edition
    If you’ve got muscle, flaunt it

    WITH an unprecedented display of its rapidly growing naval armoury, China has flaunted its ambitions as a global power. To mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), Chinese leaders on April 23rd reviewed a maritime parade of hardware ranging from nuclear submarines to amphibious assault-craft and fighter bombers. The only missing ingredient of naval might was an aircraft-carrier. Officials hint it will not be long before China has some of these too.

    Ten years ago, the PLAN’s 50th anniversary slipped by with little more than a few commemorative stamps and plenty of bunting. But the last decade has seen the fruits of a huge military modernisation and expansion programme, launched after tensions mounted in the Taiwan Strait in 1995 and 1996. This has included the purchase of billions of dollars worth of Russian naval hardware, and the deployment of homemade ships, submarines and missiles. The build-up has sent ripples of unease across China’s neighbourhood.

    China was anxious lest the parade, in the port city of Qingdao, sent too scary a message. It invited foreign navies to take part too, including America’s 7th Fleet, which sent a guided-missile destroyer, the USS Fitzgerald. The official theme of the show was “harmonious ocean”. China’s neighbours wish it were so. China disputes its sea borders with several countries, most heatedly with Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines. Of the five floating vessels at Qingdao’s naval history museum, two were involved in the sinking of a Vietnamese ship during a skirmish in the South China Sea in 1988.

    The deployment of two American aircraft-carriers near Taiwan during a crisis in relations in 1996 troubled China’s leaders. Its military build-up, including the naval expansion, seemed primarily aimed at deterring any future American intervention over Taiwan. In the past few years, cross-strait tensions have eased, most markedly since the election last year of a more China-friendly Taiwanese president, Ma Ying-jeou. But the huge increase in its demand for foreign oil and other resources means China is now thinking more about how to protect its more distant supply lines.

    As it happens, these lines traverse the disputed South China Sea, almost all of which China claims, but where it has lacked the ability to project naval power. China is coy about its naval strategy, but in March the Pentagon’s annual report on China’s military capability argued it could be trying to develop the ability to “hold surface ships at risk” out to a second island chain (see map), far beyond the first chain, which encompasses claimed offshore territories including the South China Sea. The second chain reaches Guam, where America has a big military presence.

    Some of the new weaponry on display in Qingdao suggested that projecting power is becoming a bigger priority for China. Among the vessels inspected by President Hu Jintao from on board a Chinese-made destroyer were two nuclear-powered submarines. China’s official press identified them as a Xia-class ballistic-missile submarine and a Han-class attack submarine. These are not China’s very latest models, but showing them at all was rare.

    China is coy about its submarines. Foreign military officials attending the regatta toured a Song-class diesel-electric submarine. The Song has been in use since the 1990s, but it was the first time that some of these officials, despite repeated requests, had been allowed inside one. China has said nothing about its new Jin-class submarines armed with long-range nuclear missiles. The Pentagon reported that the first of these had been deployed.

    The Qingdao review did include an interesting addition to China’s fleet, a Yuzhao-class amphibious-assault ship, which could be used to dispatch troops and helicopters over long distances. One Western diplomat says he sees its deployment as potentially useful for settling scores in the South China Sea. The contrast between the display of such weaponry and China’s rhetoric about harmony he calls “a bit of schizophrenia”. China’s self-image as a responsible great power was also on show, however, with a large new hospital ship, useful for humanitarian missions. Three vessels have just completed an anti-piracy tour in the Gulf of Aden. This continuing mission is China’s first active naval deployment beyond the Pacific.

    Chinese leaders chose not to spoil the jolly mood in Qingdao by talking about aircraft carriers. But officials have dropped several recent hints that China is close to announcing it will acquire its first one. Admiral Gary Roughead, the American navy’s highest-ranking officer, told reporters in Qingdao that “it may cause concern” among navies in the region if China failed to make clear how it planned to use a carrier. But since such a ship would be of limited use in coastal defence, coming clean might cause even more concern.

Similar Threads

  1. Does the Constitution protect everybody in America??
    By socialize_me in forum U.S. Constitution
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-01-2008, 10:13 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-08-2008, 04:10 PM
  3. Does the Protect America Act only target overseas?
    By jrich4rpaul in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-25-2008, 07:38 AM
  4. Ron Paul on the Protect America Act
    By Ex Post Facto in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 04:21 PM
  5. Ron Paul:Protect America from the Protect America Act
    By Vladimir_Matovic in forum Ron Paul: On the Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-01-2008, 07:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts