Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: 20 million jobs lost (China economy)

  1. #1

    20 million jobs lost (China economy)

    China says 20 million migrant workers have lost their jobs during the economic downturn - three times greater than had been suggested previously.

    A survey carried out in 15 provinces suggests around 15% of the total migrant labour pool is now unemployed.

    Each year between five and seven million new workers from rural areas come to China's biggest cities looking for work.

    They join a migrant worker labour pool estimated at around 130 million.

    There are fears that large numbers of unemployed workers could lead to social unrest.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7864293.stm



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    I think population of Tokyo is 20 million people.

  4. #3
    20 million hungry people can be a problem for a dictatorship. But not one that can't be solved. They can be put to work building a moon base. China is going to conquer the universe I tell you.

  5. #4
    So, they go back home and farm. China will be just fine, thank you.

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by MachM View Post
    I think population of Tokyo is 20 million people.
    Tokyo last i checked is not in China

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by raystone View Post
    So, they go back home and farm. China will be just fine, thank you.
    Oh, they have farms big enough to feed 20 million extra mouths? Then they should have been doing that to start with. Why did these people leave the farms to look for work in the cities? Because they weren't doing so well on the farm. One drought and they will all be starving. They won't be doing very well then. No, they need to start drawing up plans for their moon base and get them trained and educated to build the thing.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeez View Post
    Tokyo last i checked is not in China
    I think he knew that. I think it was just a comparison to better grasp just how many people in China have recently lost their jobs. A whole super size city laid off, imagine that.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by RickyJ View Post
    I think he knew that. I think it was just a comparison to better grasp just how many people in China have recently lost their jobs. A whole super size city laid off, imagine that.
    IIRC there are close to 300 mill till living at poverty levels in China 20 million isn't going to make things much worse. These people really have no say, china's main priority is its middle class.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by RickyJ View Post
    Oh, they have farms big enough to feed 20 million extra mouths? Then they should have been doing that to start with. Why did these people leave the farms to look for work in the cities? Because they weren't doing so well on the farm. One drought and they will all be starving. They won't be doing very well then. No, they need to start drawing up plans for their moon base and get them trained and educated to build the thing.

    China has enough arable land and water to feed its projected population of 1.48 billion in 2025. Not big farms, but an incredible number of family farms. The migrant workers go to the city for a shot at increased prosperity, but it's not do or die.

  12. #10
    not for nothing, but China has about 2 trillion in reserves in USD alone. They could maybe, buy some food with that?
    you can buy now using an elevated dollar to get in on things that are poised to go way up when the dollar collapses. If he's right, and I think he is, his profits are going to be ridiculous. I've already showed by referencing some mining stocks that you can make a killing in this market playing Schiff's investment strategy.

    -theoakman, RPF 1/26/09.

    Oh what a difference 10 months makes. Deflationists, where are thou?

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by theoakman View Post
    not for nothing, but China has about 2 trillion in reserves in USD alone. They could maybe, buy some food with that?
    lol. winner!

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by theoakman View Post
    not for nothing, but China has about 2 trillion in reserves in USD alone. They could maybe, buy some food with that?
    I'll sell them some food...
    But I didn't know the chinese ruling elite cared much about their slave labor pools.
    Just enough grits or oatmeal to keep them working.
    rewritten history with armies of their crooks - invented memories, did burn all the books... Mark Knopfler

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by torchbearer View Post
    But I didn't know the chinese ruling elite cared much about their slave labor pools.
    Exactly. That is why I am glad to have Obama cuz like, Obama cares. lol wtf

    Just enough grits or oatmeal to keep them working.

    Last edited by danberkeley; 02-02-2009 at 12:23 PM.

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeez View Post
    IIRC there are close to 300 mill till living at poverty levels in China 20 million isn't going to make things much worse. These people really have no say, china's main priority is its middle class.
    No, if they are a problem, the government will just kill them--plain and simple. You understand that PRC is not egalitarian and is a tyrannical police state that was placed in power by large banking interests...right?
    "Masterful and arrogant wealth, created largely by Government protection of its profits, not content with its domination and influence within a single party, had sought to corrupt them both, and to that end had insinuated itself into the primaries, in order that no candidates might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs." (‘Colonel’ Edward Mandell House in 'Philip Dru: Administrator', circa 1912)

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by RickyJ View Post
    I think he knew that. I think it was just a comparison to better grasp just how many people in China have recently lost their jobs. A whole super size city laid off, imagine that.
    Yes, just think the whole of Tokyo is unemployed. That is 20 million people unemployed.

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by RickyJ View Post
    20 million hungry people can be a problem for a dictatorship. But not one that can't be solved. They can be put to work building a moon base. China is going to conquer the universe I tell you.
    Actually if you have 20 million hungry people, the best way to put them to work is in farms, eh?

    We modern people are so lazy and confused that we forget that our agricultural technology actually allows one person to feed maybe as much as a hundred others, if not more. Starvation should never really be an issue with our modern technology, in theory.

    In practice though, politics and "career choices" may result in not having enough food to feed everyone who needs to.

    What did Jim Rogers say? Farmers will be the ones driving Maseratis, while the financiers will be the ones driving tractors and taxis soon.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by jon_perez View Post
    Actually if you have 20 million hungry people, the best way to put them to work is in farms, eh?
    They aren't hungry because of a lack of food, they are hungry because they have no job to buy the food. More food production is not the answer, more industrial and technical jobs are.

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by RickyJ View Post
    They aren't hungry because of a lack of food, they are hungry because they have no job to buy the food. More food production is not the answer, more industrial and technical jobs are.
    Who was one of there biggest buyers? We were.
    Now that we are broke.. who are they going to sell too?
    Everyone else is broke too.
    So they collected huge savings... and now have no more customers.

    On a gold standard, they would now have to buy from us until we have enough money to buy there stuff again.
    rewritten history with armies of their crooks - invented memories, did burn all the books... Mark Knopfler

  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeez View Post
    IIRC there are close to 300 mill till living at poverty levels in China 20 million isn't going to make things much worse. These people really have no say, china's main priority is its middle class.
    The problem is that these 20 million have had a taste of the "good life" and they won't be satisfied with moving on down. Most of China's 300 million in poverty have never had a taste of the good life so they can be somewhat content with what they have. But these newly unemployed will be restless. The Chinese government better find them something to do or there will be problems.

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by RickyJ View Post
    They aren't hungry because of a lack of food, they are hungry because they have no job to buy the food. More food production is not the answer, more industrial and technical jobs are.

    The logical solution will be a reduction in the 'useless feeders'--watch how all this will unfold. They are completely inculcated/domesticated with no private firearm ownership; they will rely on the state for solutions.
    Last edited by lucius; 02-02-2009 at 12:57 PM.
    "Masterful and arrogant wealth, created largely by Government protection of its profits, not content with its domination and influence within a single party, had sought to corrupt them both, and to that end had insinuated itself into the primaries, in order that no candidates might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs." (‘Colonel’ Edward Mandell House in 'Philip Dru: Administrator', circa 1912)

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by torchbearer View Post
    Who was one of there biggest buyers? We were.
    Now that we are broke.. who are they going to sell too?
    Everyone else is broke too.

    On a gold standard, they would now have to buy from us until we have enough money to buy there stuff again.
    Yes. THeir exports have collapsed. They can sell their stuff to themselves. However, they can only do that if their currency appreciates.

    So they collected huge savings... and now have no more customers.
    They can buy their own stuff. with that savings.

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by danberkeley View Post
    Yes. THeir exports have collapsed. They can sell their stuff to themselves. However, they can only do that if their currency appreciates.



    They can buy their own stuff. with that savings.
    That assume the people have the savings and not the ruling elite.
    If they can buy their own stuff, why are they having problems?
    Shouldn't they be totally self sufficient with everyone having a huge savings account and a booming economy?
    Yet, they have the opposite.
    So, who is right? You or Me?
    rewritten history with armies of their crooks - invented memories, did burn all the books... Mark Knopfler

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by torchbearer View Post
    That assume the people have the savings and not the ruling elite.
    The Chinese middle class has a huge savings rate. Who do think let the Americans borrow the money to buy stuff? Look at America's saving rate. It negative last year. How were Americans able to buy stuff?

    If they can buy their own stuff, why are they having problems?
    They are trouble EXPORTING. Americans and Europeans are buying less stuff. If the Chinese started buying their own stuff, their exports would still suffer because they arent expoorting, but their domestic sales would skyrocket.

    Shouldn't they be totally self sufficient with everyone having a huge savings account and a booming economy?
    They can be.

  27. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by torchbearer View Post
    That assume the people have the savings and not the ruling elite.
    If they can buy their own stuff, why are they having problems?
    Shouldn't they be totally self sufficient with everyone having a huge savings account and a booming economy?
    Yet, they have the opposite.
    So, who is right? You or Me?
    a lot of their businesses were set up for exporting to other countries. The transition from exporting from ships to shipping by truck across the country doesn't happen in a matter of months. Regardless of the fact, if China wants to do an "economic stimulus", which I think is the wrong move, they have the money to do it and they don't have to print it out of thin air.
    you can buy now using an elevated dollar to get in on things that are poised to go way up when the dollar collapses. If he's right, and I think he is, his profits are going to be ridiculous. I've already showed by referencing some mining stocks that you can make a killing in this market playing Schiff's investment strategy.

    -theoakman, RPF 1/26/09.

    Oh what a difference 10 months makes. Deflationists, where are thou?



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    1.3 Billion people and 20 Million unemployed = .015% Unemployment

    Seems pretty insignificant to me. Especially knowing that the savings rate of the Chinese population is around 40-50%. Many left their village farms over the last few years to go work in the cities. They saved the majority of what they earned and now they'll go work on the village farms until things pick back up.



Similar Threads

  1. Over 170 Million Jobs Could Be Lost Due To Sequestration !!!
    By green73 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 02-28-2013, 08:34 PM
  2. U.S. economy lost nearly 700,000 jobs because Of NAFTA, EPI says
    By tangent4ronpaul in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 08:31 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 10:46 AM
  4. Krugman: U.S. Loses 1.4 Million Jobs Due to China
    By bobbyw24 in forum Economy & Markets
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-04-2010, 07:50 PM
  5. Obama is right, we have lost 3.6 million jobs, but ---
    By johnwk in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-10-2009, 06:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •