Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Want to be able to buy new full autos again? Read this.

  1. #1

    Want to be able to buy new full autos again? Read this.

    There's a decent chance that the economic situation is only going to get worse, and that Our Benevolent Masters are going to have another bailout bill put in front of them, and it's going to pass.

    Now.

    There was a whole bunch of pork added onto the bill before it passed. Stuff like this:

    New Tax earmarks in Bailout bill
    - Film and Television Productions (Sec. 502)
    - Wooden Arrows designed for use by children (Sec. 503)
    - 6 page package of earmarks for litigants in the 1989 Exxon Valdez incident, Alaska (Sec. 504)

    Tax earmark “extenders” in the bailout bill.
    - Virgin Island and Puerto Rican Rum (Section 308)
    - American Samoa (Sec. 309)
    - Mine Rescue Teams (Sec. 310)
    - Mine Safety Equipment (Sec. 311)
    - Domestic Production Activities in Puerto Rico (Sec. 312)
    - Indian Tribes (Sec. 314, 315)
    - Railroads (Sec. 316)
    - Auto Racing Tracks (317)
    - District of Columbia (Sec. 322)
    - Wool Research (Sec. 325)
    Most of it wasn't read at all before it passed. IMHO, we lost an opportunity.

    Now, in the next one, how about we add a section (written by me):

    SECTION 429. TOOL AND DIE MANUFACTURERS.
    1. In 18-922, striking section (o).
    2. In 18-922, striking section (r).
    Or some variation. They won't even read it before voting on it. Bush certainly won't read it. They didn't last time. Get someone to slip it in at the last minute before printing, or have a midnight voice vote like last time. We just need a Congresscritter crazy enough to do it.

    And before anyone asks, I'm completely serious.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by fgd View Post
    There's a decent chance that the economic situation is only going to get worse, and that Our Benevolent Masters are going to have another bailout bill put in front of them, and it's going to pass.

    Now.

    There was a whole bunch of pork added onto the bill before it passed. Stuff like this:


    Most of it wasn't read at all before it passed. IMHO, we lost an opportunity.

    Now, in the next one, how about we add a section (written by me):



    Or some variation. They won't even read it before voting on it. Bush certainly won't read it. They didn't last time. Get someone to slip it in at the last minute before printing, or have a midnight voice vote like last time. We just need a Congresscritter crazy enough to do it.

    And before anyone asks, I'm completely serious.
    Nice

  4. #3
    So who would we get to put it in there?
    "They [the Soviets] intend...to induce the Americans to adopt their own 'restructuring' and convergence of the Soviet and American systems ... Convergence will be accompanied by blood baths and political re-education camps in Western Europe and the United States. The Soviet strategists are counting on an economic depression in the United States and intend to introduce their reformed model of socialism with a human face as an alternative to the American system during the depression."
    Anatoliy Golitsyn The Perestroika Deception 1990


  5. #4
    I'm not sure how this would work. explain please.
    "I know the urge to arm yourself, because that’s what I did. I was trained in firearms. When I walked to the hospital when my husband was sick, I carried a concealed weapon. I made the determination that if somebody was going to try to take me out I was going to take them with me."

    Diane Feinstein, 1995

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Uriel999 View Post
    I'm not sure how this would work. explain please.
    Basically, follow the same procedure to insert this as they did to insert "wooden arrows" legislation. Hide it under something like "tool and die manufacturers". Follow the existing amendment procedures, and don't ever refer to it being about firearms.

    I'm almost positive there's going to be a Christmas "stimulus" package that we could get this tacked onto.

    I would look at the House members for Idaho and Montana in addition to Ron Paul, but anything that Paul proposes will be scrutinized.

  7. #6
    That would be awesome.

  8. #7
    They don't allow just random amendments to these things, they have "bipartisan" committees in back rooms writing all the additional crap based on specific votes they're trying to turn.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-25-2011, 03:24 AM
  2. China Charges a 25% Tariff on Our Autos?
    By tjeffersonsghost in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-07-2010, 10:29 AM
  3. Black Box for Autos
    By wildturkey in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-02-2010, 06:00 PM
  4. Gold for Autos
    By RSLudlum in forum Economy & Markets
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-23-2010, 05:57 PM
  5. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 02-10-2008, 10:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •