Reply With Quote
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Posted here too:
http://www.independentpoliticalrepor...ve-evaporated/
This just sounds like a stupid rumor. Wait until Ron Paul comments on the subject before spreading it around.
----
Ron Paul Forum's Mission Statement:
Inspired by US Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, this site is dedicated to facilitating grassroots initiatives that aim to restore a sovereign limited constitutional Republic based on the rule of law, states' rights and individual rights. We seek to enshrine the original intent of our Founders to foster respect for private property, seek justice, provide opportunity, and to secure individual liberty for ourselves and our posterity.
Oh please! Just because Ron Paul didn't put Chuck in his top 5 doesn't mean he doesn't still support him.
Geesh! We have bigger fish to fry!
Baldwin's name was never around immediately after the endorsement to begin with. Baldwin is Ron Paul's personal endorsement. Campaign for Liberty cannot legally endorse anyone.
Theocrats For LifeOriginally Posted by literatim
stick it in your sig
...says the person who supports the fascist tool Barr.
How do you know who I support? Are you a mindreader? Atleast I'm not a protectionist, atleast I don't support the party of banning porn. You, sir, give libertarians a bad name.
I don't need to be a mind reader to read your threads and posts.
If you were the prime example what a libertarian was, I wouldn't want to be one.
Where? Liar. I'm a strong proponent of free markets and individual liberty, this is what you oppose? Well, no surprise.
Where? Liar. I'm a strong proponent of free markets and individual liberty, this is what you oppose? Well, no surprise.http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showpos...0&postcount=18I'm voting for Barr. Not Obama. But nice try. You're still voting for McCain. Palin supports the federal WoD btw.
As for supporting free markets, you probably don't even know what free market economics is. Free market is not necessarily laissez-faire or anarcho-capitalist and it does not exclude all taxation. Tariffs are no more protectionist than the tax you pay on gas that is suppose to pay for road construction. The only time they become protectionist is if you target specific industries with high tariffs and thus try to regulate the market.
Calling me a protectionist is like calling Ron Paul an isolationist. It is ignorance on your part.
Some of us are more interested in saving our country, than we are the latest issue of Penthouse.
Ok this article is pure speculation and just stupid.
Posting Permissions
Connect With Us