NEW MEXICO (Albuquerque Journal): Obama - 45%, McCain - 40%, Nader - 1%.
My review of the For Liberty documentary:
digg.com/d315eji
(please Digg and post comments on the HuffPost site)
"This political train-wreck Republicans face can largely be traced to Bush’s philosophical metamorphosis from a traditional, non-interventionist conservative to the neoconservatives’ exemplar of a 'War President', and his positioning of the Republicans as the 'War Party'."
Nicholas Sanchez on Bush's legacy, September 30, 2007.
I pretty much agree with most of the people in the forum. I really dont understand why Nader is running. Not to say he does not have the right to run, but from listening to his reasons for running, it seems it will be better served if he just pledged his support for Kerry instead of taking votes from him.And with the Republicans helping get on the ballot and him accpeting what they are doing for him, it just leaves me more puzzled. Is he getting paid under the table by the Republican Party to ensure a Bush re-election??? Im just wondering.
Pertinent questions indeed.
Yall do realize that is from another era and I haven't seen the OP around here in ages.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us