Minnesota cast 6 votes for Ron Paul, but they were not counted. So instead of reporting 41 votes, our state only reported 35. This after our delegation was promised their Ron Paul votes would be counted.
Minnesota cast 6 votes for Ron Paul, but they were not counted. So instead of reporting 41 votes, our state only reported 35. This after our delegation was promised their Ron Paul votes would be counted.
In your hearts, you know he's right.
I explained this in January but most people weren't paying attention yet:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=104384
Originally Posted by Bradley in DC
My review of the For Liberty documentary:
digg.com/d315eji
(please Digg and post comments on the HuffPost site)
"This political train-wreck Republicans face can largely be traced to Bush’s philosophical metamorphosis from a traditional, non-interventionist conservative to the neoconservatives’ exemplar of a 'War President', and his positioning of the Republicans as the 'War Party'."
Nicholas Sanchez on Bush's legacy, September 30, 2007.
Isn't it a beautiful thing how carefully the G.O.P. rules are crafted to allow for just anything at all except dissent? You may vote for the officially sanctioned candidate even if not one Republican in your whole state voted for the bastard, but try to vote your conscience and you're risking jail time depending on your state. Just lovely.
We can't let them redirect the debate back to Red/Blue. Rand Paul's filibuster served as a clarion call, and opened eyes to the real divide--liberty v. tyranny. Everyone saw the president stall twenty-four hours before the AG confirmed we still have Constitutional due process. Don't let them turn this back into 'Left'/'Right' dogmaganda.
We, the People--'Red' and 'Blue'--must hang together or surely we will hang seperately.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote