Nothing Racist appeared prior to 1992?
have Ron Paul turn over the archives, and then you can determine whether or not it was racist after 1994 and inthe the 70s and 80s. What is he trying to hide?
Lew Rockwell being editor doesn't matter, because Ron Paul is still listed as AUTHOR, and he still has strong ties to Rockwell to this day.
Oh, and ask him for any scans or records of his MLK day vote. Because i have Scans that suggest otherwise,and in fact show Ron Paul voting ney.
http://wwsword.blogspot.com/2008/01/...o-mlk-day.html
this just confirms Ron Paul's no vote
http://wwsword.blogspot.com/2008/01/...pauls-nay.html
Now for the iceing on the cake
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/124339.html
Dr. Ron Paul, a Republican congressional candidate from Texas, wrote in his political newsletter in 1992 that 95 percent of the black men in Washington, D.C., are "semi-criminal or entirely criminal."
He also wrote that black teenagers can be "unbelievably fleet of foot." [...]
Dr. Paul, who is running in Texas' 14th Congressional District, defended his writings in an interview Tuesday. He said they were being taken out of context.
"It's typical political demagoguery," he said. "If people are interested in my character ... come and talk to my neighbors." [...]
According to a Dallas Morning News review of documents circulating among Texas Democrats, Dr. Paul wrote in a 1992 issue of the Ron Paul Political Report: "If you have ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet of foot they can be."
Dr. Paul, who served in Congress in the late 1970s and early 1980s, said Tuesday that he has produced the newsletter since 1985 and distributes it to an estimated 7,000 to 8,000 subscribers. A phone call to the newsletter's toll-free number was answered by his campaign staff. [...]
Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be read and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation. [...]
And saying that "I'm more tolerant of gays" doesn't mean you can't be a homophobe.More tolerant compared to what? David Duke? The KKK?
Connect With Us