Ron Paul’s Top 5 Political Book — But No Review

[muzzled dogg]

Ron Paul’s Top 5 Political Book — But No Review

Over at the LewRockwell.com blog, Dan McCarthy points out that the New York Times recently listed Ron Paul’s The Revolution: A Manifesto and Pat Buchanan’s Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War as the number 4 and number 5 political bestsellers, respectively, for July, and yet has reviewed neither one. The Washington Post hasn’t touched them, either.

But there’s no Establishment bias in our media, of course.

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog/?p=147




i sent an email to a few of these email addresses and ask them if they have any intentions of reviewing it
http://nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/...directory.html

[Kludge]

It could be worse....

Atlas Shrugged as reviewed by later-known Communist spy, Whittaker Chambers

[Kotin]

It could be worse....

Atlas Shrugged as reviewed by later-known Communist spy, Whittaker Chambers

hahahaha!


now that's a good one.

[Conza88]

Good work! I await their non- / bull$#@! reply...

[muzzled dogg]

no response

[Imperial]

Interestingly though, Atlas Shrugged at least is read in certain schools across the nation.

So, the viewpoint can get across.

Too bad. If Ron Paul could write his views in story form, it could infiltrate high schools across America...

[LibertyEagle]

It could be worse....

Atlas Shrugged as reviewed by later-known Communist spy, Whittaker Chambers

I wonder if he wrote that, before or after he renounced Communism and testified against Alger Hiss.

Note: I recommend Chambers' autobiography, Witness, to everyone. It was an interesting look into someone's mind who was actively trying to overthrow our form of government and his awakening when he realized Communism was not what he had originallyl thought in his idealistic mind.

[Kludge]

I wonder if he wrote that, before or after he renounced Communism and testified against Alger Hiss.

Before, hence why I wrote "later-known". Some jackass had much of his article quoted in a CLC article when I was doing an essay on Rand so I curiously googled why this fool was making so many horse$#@! conclusions such as that Rand's philosophy would "lead to the gas chambers."

Apparently, HE HADN'T EVEN READ THE BOOK!

Gah!