I agreeOriginally Posted by jmdrake
Reply With Quote
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
I agree
You have proven yourself to be a dip$#@! time and time again. Your hypocrisy is getting pretty old.
You obviously wish to pursue the red state versus blue state mentality because that is all your limited intellect can grasp. Congrats, you are the perfect useless tool.
Is this necessary? Some people agree. Some people disagree. Some who disagree agree to disagree. Some who disagree choose to fight. This need to spiral down into name calling and being offended and WHATEVER in just about every thread with the words Christian and atheist in it is what's really retarded. There's no point to it. You handful of arguers just get all ruffled and give each other more reasons to argue. It's a waste of time and energy. Grow up.
+1000
I totally agree!
Kade gives atheists a bad name.
He is a hypocrite with little common sense on display.
As an atheist, I get annoyed when I see this type of behavior. We clearly have failed in self policing. Sorry!
Sometimes I think Kade is just trying to cattle prod the level of debate up a notch. Sort of like a humorless yongrel...
Have faith in the forum guidelines. If you can't say something nice, find some links that will rip his argument to shreds.
That'll get him!
Better not to argue about it at all... it just feeds the problem.
+8000
I'm not sure where you get your sense of history from. When was there a time that most Christians were "democrat"? During the time of Lincoln there were Christian republicans who were against slavery as well as Christian democrats who supported it. (And before some neoconfederate pipes I yes I know that there were other issues in the civil war besides just slavery but that was the major moral issue of the time.) Down through the years members of both parties have wrapped themselves in the Bible and the flag. During the civil rights struggle you had pro integration and pro segregation "Christian" democrats as well as republicans. And up until Roe vs. Wade abortion general was not seen as a "necessary evil". It was seen as a decision to be left up to the states. Some states allowed abortion. Many banned it except for the most extreme circumstances. Since it was an issue that was decided locally there was no reason for any national political movement against it.
Regards,
John M. Drake
9/11 Thermate experiments
Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I
"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"
"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul
"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
allowing him to carry on unimpeded is no good either.
Instead of arguing, just call a spade a spade, and then move on.
That way others come in reading his nonsense and quickly realize he has no pull in this particular movement. We are not keen on religious bigotry here.
Allowing him to carry on unimpeded just makes it look like he is talking to himself.
Nobody will listen to the wind as it is something they have gotten used to hearing as a minor impediment when listening to something else.
Christians are very nice...
when they are lion poo.
I like a challenge. It helps me grow. So I don't mind hearing perspective from someone whose world view is different than mine. Every atheist is a different person just like every Christian is a different person. It's only when the conversations become heated arguments that spiral down into personal attacks that I have a problem.
this isn't true.
It actually is similar to the diamond tactic that has been discussed on these forums before.
If we allow him to carry on while ignoring it, it appears we are in agreement, which we are not!
Seems to work when I make a post people don't agree with. They just ignore what I said and go on with the thread.
There are those however who like to argue and they will respond.
Responding to a personal attack, especially one with no basis in reality, is not senseless arguing. There is nothing wrong with defending oneself.
Thank you.
My point exactly. People want to talk about individualism, but eventually they revert back to that collectivism they know so well.
Ron Paul For President 2008!
Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms.-Ron Paul
Christianity-It's a RELATIONSHIP not a RELIGION.
Posting Permissions
Connect With Us