Does spp.gov have any good info on it regarding the NAU?

[rpfreedom08]

Just wondering. I'm in an arguement and they won't hear of an NAU until they get info from the SPP website. That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard but whatever.

[pcosmar]

What do they need as proof?
The SPP is following the CFRs roadmap.
http://www.cfr.org/content/publicati...a_TF_final.pdf

[rpfreedom08]

I already showed them that and they said if it's not on the spp site then they don't care. I know it's dumb but then again people indoctrinated into the system don't always seem to make much sense.

[dsentell]

Just wondering. I'm in an arguement and they won't hear of an NAU until they get info from the SPP website. That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard but whatever.

If the people you are trying to convince are determined that the info come from the SPP website, then you are out of luck. Since that website had the light shown on it by Jerome Corsi a couple of years ago, they have completely sanitized it.

After hearing Mr. Corsi speak of the NAFTA superhighway, I went to SPP and on their home page was a map showing the proposed route and an article speaking of the glory of the superhighway.

About a year ago, I told a friend about the superhighway and we pulled up the SPP site. On the entire site, I could find no mention of the highway AT ALL. It had simply vanished.

Now the last couple of times I have visited SPP, the superhighway is mentioned, but is under the fact-vs-fiction section. It is, of course, now a myth.

I believe that the info that used to be on SPP about the NAU is still on the web, just has been moved to different sites.

For example, the NAFTA Superhighway is now called the "NASCO Corridor." Click on "Inland Ports Network", and surprise. There is the superhighway map that used to be on the SPP website.

http://www.nascocorridor.com/

[acptulsa]

Tell the fiction part of it to the people near I-35 who are getting their land snatched from them.

[pcosmar]

Just when and how was the President authorized to enter into a treaty or agreement?
Who gave the authority?



...sound of crickets...

[Bryan]

Be sure to check into the "North American Competitiveness Council"
http://www.spp.gov/factsheet.asp

Nothing there is going to say "NAU" but what it all does say is that we are creating new governing bodies (paid for with tax dollars) that will gain small increments of authority which have all the promise to override federal, state and local laws. From what I've seen, much of the power structure is fuzzy and they'll talk a lot about the NACC "making recommendations" but we'll see. The merger is in the making, but it's coming piece by piece...

[rpfreedom08]

If the people you are trying to convince are determined that the info come from the SPP website, then you are out of luck. Since that website had the light shown on it by Jerome Corsi a couple of years ago, they have completely sanitized it.

After hearing Mr. Corsi speak of the NAFTA superhighway, I went to SPP and on their home page was a map showing the proposed route and an article speaking of the glory of the superhighway.

About a year ago, I told a friend about the superhighway and we pulled up the SPP site. On the entire site, I could find no mention of the highway AT ALL. It had simply vanished.

Now the last couple of times I have visited SPP, the superhighway is mentioned, but is under the fact-vs-fiction section. It is, of course, now a myth.

I believe that the info that used to be on SPP about the NAU is still on the web, just has been moved to different sites.

For example, the NAFTA Superhighway is now called the "NASCO Corridor." Click on "Inland Ports Network", and surprise. There is the superhighway map that used to be on the SPP website.

http://www.nascocorridor.com/

lol, I love the fact and fiction part of that website as well.

myth: there is a conspiracy fact: no there isn't

Rofl...

I'm still trying to find info thanks for all the replies.

[rpfreedom08]

Here is what they guys response to me was...

Of course we would mind a North American Union! If we thought it was a realistic possibility that the borders would disappear or our currency would fall under the control of a different evil-doer (instead of the evil Fed) we would help to man the barricades.

But so far it's all just a gleam in some Illuminata's eye.

The Council of Foreign Relations is just a left leaning think tank. There are people there as diverse and Scowcroft and Brzezinski and Dick Cheney and Colin Powell and Tom Brokaw and Paul Volker and Kissinger and George Soros and David Rockefeller and Robert Rubin and the late Jeanne Kirkpatrick and Diane Sawyer and Vin Weber. They just kick around ideas and publish papers, some of which are good and some of which are absurd. We have think tanks of all persuasions but just because some guys write a paper it does not me there is a secret plan to do us in.

[Carole]

Unfortunately, this person has drunk the kool-aid.

The outer ring of the CFR appears innocent enough, but the deeper the rings approach the center, the more nefarious it all really is.

And so it goes with all the think tanks and foundations.

Too bad.