Is that a law or are you just saying that people wouldn't work to get signatures if they nominated someone who refused to run? I was under the impression that their signatures got the party on the ballot, and that they would have to get access via signatures again next election anyway unless they got a decent % of the vote.
The best way for them to get that % of the vote would be to nominate Dr. P. He would probably get more votes than anyone else they could nominate even if he refused to campaign. As long as his name could appear on the ballot, I think it would be a win-win for both parties and for Dr. P.



Reply With Quote


