Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 121 to 134 of 134

Thread: Post your Consitutional Amendment ideas here

  1. #121
    Quote Originally Posted by AZJoe View Post
    Amendment to Repeal the Constitution.
    Back to the Articles of Confederation.
    There is no spoon.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #122
    I'm ready to make it unconstitutional to do any polls about elections. Outlaw all election polls but the election itself.

    Let's eliminate any way to know who's winning the 'horse race' and stop distracting ourselves from the candidates and issues.

  4. #123
    1. Eliminate the Federal Reserve and outlaw the use of central banks.

    2. Repeal the 16th amendment, abolish the IRS and have all federal taxes apportioned as was originally written in the constitution.

    3. Nullify all executive orders and outlaw the use of any further executive orders.

    4. All federal, state and local elections must have a verifiable paper trail.

    5. Outlaw Gerrymandering

    6. Nullify all federal and state laws requiring vaccination or any other medical procedure.

    7. All proposed bills must be read aloud, in full before voting on the bill and any member of congress that leaves during this forfeits their vote on the bill.

    8. All legal tender must be backed by gold, silver or other precious metal.

    9. Nullify all election laws restricting third parties and third party and independent candidates.

  5. #124
    Amendment Zero: The whole of the people shall be passed a pistol and all issues settled thereby.
    freedomisobvious.blogspot.com

    There is only one correct way: freedom. All other solutions are non-solutions.

    It appears that artificial intelligence is at least slightly superior to natural stupidity.

    Our words make us the ghosts that we are.

    Convincing the world he didn't exist was the Devil's second greatest trick; the first was convincing us that God didn't exist.

  6. #125
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry C View Post
    2. Repeal the 16th amendment, abolish the IRS and have all federal taxes apportioned as was originally written in the constitution.
    The only taxes the Constitution has ever required to be apportioned are direct taxes, which are limited to capitations and property taxes. Repealing the 16th won't help, since the taxing authority comes from I.8.1.
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous

  7. #126
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonny Tufts View Post
    The only taxes the Constitution has ever required to be apportioned are direct taxes, which are limited to capitations and property taxes. Repealing the 16th won't help, since the taxing authority comes from I.8.1.
    Amend. 16th is perfectly fine just they way it is at present. It is only that its intended context has been misstated by many decades of continued IRS propaganda--and a Congress filled with pedophiles and/or that are concerned islands under too much weight tip over and/or who believe Mars is closer to the Sun than our Earth.

    Abolishing the IRS certainly would help in setting constitutional taxation back onto the correct path within America--Amend. 16 taxes income as a gain or profit (e.g., increase in personal or professional financial wealth), but not financial capital as an equal conversion, exchange, or quid pro quo.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding one’s self in the ranks of the insane.” — Marcus Aurelius

    They’re not buying it. CNN, you dumb bastards!” — President Trump 2020

    Consilio et Animis de Oppresso Liber

  8. #127
    Abolish the American government

  9. #128
    Violation of the Oath of Office by the introduction or promotion of anti-constitutional legislation or regulation shall be a felony constituting a class of treason, with the severity of the punishment concordant with the severity of the offense, from the minimum felony count in the jurisdiction wherein the case is tried, up to capital punishment by public hanging. Guilt and punishment to be decided by 3/4 vote of a 144 member empaneled grand jury.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #129
    Acknowledgement of TONA Title of nobility amendment.
    “[T]he enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices off the table.” (Heller, 554 U.S., at ___, 128 S.Ct., at 2822.)

    How long before "going liberal" replaces "going postal"?

  12. #130
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    Violation of the Oath of Office by the introduction or promotion of anti-constitutional legislation or regulation shall be a felony constituting a class of treason, with the severity of the punishment concordant with the severity of the offense, from the minimum felony count in the jurisdiction wherein the case is tried, up to capital punishment by public hanging. Guilt and punishment to be decided by 3/4 vote of a 144 member empaneled grand jury.
    Nice, would only add that since America is a democracy, it should only require a quorum.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding one’s self in the ranks of the insane.” — Marcus Aurelius

    They’re not buying it. CNN, you dumb bastards!” — President Trump 2020

    Consilio et Animis de Oppresso Liber

  13. #131
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom View Post
    Violation of the Oath of Office by the introduction or promotion of anti-constitutional legislation or regulation shall be a felony constituting a class of treason, with the severity of the punishment concordant with the severity of the offense, from the minimum felony count in the jurisdiction wherein the case is tried, up to capital punishment by public hanging. Guilt and punishment to be decided by 3/4 vote of a 144 member empaneled grand jury.
    Will this grand jury (whose members may have no legal training whatsoever) also decide whether the legislation was unconstitutional?

    Regardless of who decides that issue this smacks of the old system of common law crimes, under which someone could be punished for doing or failing to do something at a time when he could not possibly have known that his action or inaction was illegal. Not all constitutional issues are clear cut, and reasonable minds can differ on whether a particular piece of legislation is constitutional. No one in his right mind would ever agree to serve as a legislator under such a system. If a legislator introduces a bill to codify a state's law of defamation but neglects to include a different standard for public figures (see New York Times v. Sullivan), is he to be jailed?

    Incidentally, if the bill is never passed, who would ever have standing to complain that someone introduced it? You're getting very close to criminalizing thoughts.
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous

  14. #132
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonny Tufts View Post
    Will this grand jury (whose members may have no legal training whatsoever) also decide whether the legislation was unconstitutional?

    Regardless of who decides that issue this smacks of the old system of common law crimes, under which someone could be punished for doing or failing to do something at a time when he could not possibly have known that his action or inaction was illegal. Not all constitutional issues are clear cut, and reasonable minds can differ on whether a particular piece of legislation is constitutional. No one in his right mind would ever agree to serve as a legislator under such a system. If a legislator introduces a bill to codify a state's law of defamation but neglects to include a different standard for public figures (see New York Times v. Sullivan), is he to be jailed?

    Incidentally, if the bill is never passed, who would ever have standing to complain that someone introduced it? You're getting very close to criminalizing thoughts.
    My thoughts:

    Seems pretty clear cut to me, grab a copy of the U.S. Constitution and determine the corresponding enumerated power; oh what is that cannot find one, then move for a commission to discuss the necessity of adding a new amendment to provide said enumerated power, otherwise consider the matter resolved.

    Libel and slander are matters for the states to contend with, not a federal matter, so it is outside the context of this discussion. In any case, the public figure exception was born in common law anyway; therefore, there is no reason why the same would not apply under this proposal.

    As to the bill never passing as stated in context of the proposal: "the severity of the punishment concordant with the severity of the offense"

    El perfecto.
    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding one’s self in the ranks of the insane.” — Marcus Aurelius

    They’re not buying it. CNN, you dumb bastards!” — President Trump 2020

    Consilio et Animis de Oppresso Liber

  15. #133
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry C View Post
    1. Eliminate the Federal Reserve and outlaw the use of central banks.

    2. Repeal the 16th amendment, abolish the IRS and have all federal taxes apportioned as was originally written in the constitution.

    3. Nullify all executive orders and outlaw the use of any further executive orders.

    4. All federal, state and local elections must have a verifiable paper trail.

    5. Outlaw Gerrymandering

    6. Nullify all federal and state laws requiring vaccination or any other medical procedure.

    7. All proposed bills must be read aloud, in full before voting on the bill and any member of congress that leaves during this forfeits their vote on the bill.

    8. All legal tender must be backed by gold, silver or other precious metal.

    9. Nullify all election laws restricting third parties and third party and independent candidates.
    Now we're talking !
    "Like an army falling, one by one by one" - Linkin Park

  16. #134
    Quote Originally Posted by Jesse James View Post
    Abolish the American government

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-26-2014, 12:08 AM
  2. Dylan Ratigan Consitutional Amendment...what??
    By libertybrewcity in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-10-2011, 11:56 AM
  3. Post your ad ideas
    By StateofTrance in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-27-2010, 10:30 PM
  4. Constitutional Amendment Ideas
    By enjerth in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-04-2008, 01:47 PM
  5. Post your Consitutional Amendment ideas here
    By RCA in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-14-2008, 09:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •