Right to Petition Lawsuit - Update - Treason of The Highest Order

[NeoRayden]

UPDATE!

"SHAMEFUL AND TREASONOUS"

Petition for Rehearing Filed in Landmark
Right-to-Petition Case


Taking advantage of one final procedural step to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the landmark Right to Petition case, on February 1st, Bob Schulz filed a Petition for Rehearing.

"According to its own precedent, this Court would be abdicating its duty and committing treason to the Constitution if it fails to [accept jurisdiction and hear this case]" wrote Schulz. "Tyranny marks a government that ignores its free People."

Schulz also wrote that it would be "shameful" for the Court to fail to hear this first impression question of extreme public importance involving the interpretation of the Constitution while agreeing to hear the probate/bankruptcy/defamation case of Anna Nicole Smith.

"Shall the People in republican America, with its written Constitution for the protection of the public Rights and a body of strictly limited powers, now be forbidden to do that which the Framers' intended?" asked Schulz.

Click here for a copy of the Petition for Rehearing.




.

[Truth-Bringer]

It is indeed shameful, but does one truly expect the government to rule against itself? Because that is what Schultz is asking them to do. The Supreme Court is composed of elitists, just as the Congress and Executive branch are.

What most people don't realize is that this country was founded on the Right to Petition - and it doesn't involve asking the existing courts what they think about our rights. It involves organizing ourselves into assemblies and then telling corrupt officials to respect the rights of the people, or face arrest and prosecution under authority of those assemblies. You can read a brief explanation here (the author of this article is the man whose research Schultz used to start his Right to Petition suit, even though it wasn't a true use of the Right to Petitition).

[NeoRayden]

bump...