I have a project underway to get sufficient EVIDENCE to show that the MSM is shutting Dr Paul out. That is based on raw data provided by a news monitoring service. It's still playing out, but here's where it's at:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=100886
Now, I want to attack the problem from another angle, as well. Now, I want to get internal PROOF that the MSM has actually made DECISIONS to shut the campaign, and are engaged in a conspiracy(!) to implement those decisions. I'm looking for proof, in the form of memos passed down from on-high, emailed directions, etc.
This is not just one or two people up top that are doing this. EVERYBODY below them must know that the fix is in. So, I'm proposing a monetary bounty, to draw the underlings out. Many of them may still harbor the traces of a heart, with remnants of decency, and belief in good 'ol "fair go". A number of them may just care for their country. And maybe there's even a few closet Ron Paul supporters in there.
Whatever, having a bit of money "grease the wheels" of the whistleblower scheme cannot but be a good thing in terms of making it happen, when it otherwis wouldn't, for fear of causing a stink for no potential reward.
So, I put it out to the grassroots. How much should we be offering? How can this work logistically? We can and sholud guarantee anonymity if they so seek it, but to be awarded dollars, the proof that they provide must be SOLID without their name being attached to it.
Should we shoot for $10,000 for hard evidence? $25,000? $50,000?
How about we just keep kicking funds into it, and it keeps rising...$100,000...$200,000...until someone claims it. But then their proof must be judged as being worthy, somehow. It may only be worth part of it, as it may be weak, and not cause the intended exposure. How can we judge the results of worthy proof? Of course payouts must only be done some time down the track, after the proof has been released, and found to hold water. Some may be fakes which we shall have to be on the alert for. Confirmation of seriousness can be assured by any emails be traceable via headers back to their work address. And we can ring them AT WORK, to ensure that they are serious. Then we keep their identity anonymous, and move forward with exposing the coverup.
What say ye?
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us