Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 52

Thread: Trump expected to increase Police Militarization by lifting ban on military gear

  1. #1

    Trump expected to increase Police Militarization by lifting ban on military gear



    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is preparing to lift a controversial ban on the transfer of some surplus military equipment to police departments whose battlefield-style response to rioting in a St. Louis suburb three years ago prompted a halt to the program.

    The new plan, outlined in documents obtained by USA TODAY, would roll back an Obama administration executive order that blocked armored vehicles, large-caliber weapons, ammunition and other heavy equipment from being re-purposed from foreign battlefields to America's streets.

    On Monday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is scheduled to address the annual meeting of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest police union, and he may outline the program changes there.

    Administration officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The administration's action would restore "the full scope of a longstanding program for recycling surplus, lifesaving gear from the Department of Defense, along with restoring the full scope of grants used to purchase this type of equipment from other sources,'' according to a administration summary of the new program recently circulated to some law enforcement groups.

    "Assets that would otherwise be scrapped can be re-purposed to help state, local and tribal law enforcement better protect public safety and reduce crime."
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ces/606065001/
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe






  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    #MAGA baby!
    "And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works." - Bastiat

    "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." - Voltaire

  4. #3
    What do the cops pay with?

  5. #4

    Trump to reverse ban on local police using military equipment

    President Trump is planning on reversing a ban on allowing local police forces to use surplus military equipment, according to a new report.

    The Trump administration will now allow local police forces to take and use armored vehicles, high-caliber weapons and other kinds of heavy equipment that were once used in the military, USA Today reported Sunday.


    The Obama administration initially banned the practice after police in Ferguson, Mo. were heavily criticized for using the equipment against protestors in the wake of the shooting of Michael Brown three years ago.

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions is set to address the Fraternal Order of Police Monday, where it’s believed he might unveil the new policy.


    "Assets that would otherwise be scrapped can be re-purposed to help state, local and tribal law enforcement better protect public safety and reduce crime,” administration officials wrote in a document obtained by USA Today.
    http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...uipment-report
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  6. #5
    Thank you for fixing the quote in your signature.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Thank you for fixing the quote in your signature.
    I changed it before I replied to your extra-large extra-bold font post.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  8. #7
    Can't repeal Obamacare.

    Can't repeal NAFTA.

    Can't get tax cuts.

    Can't repeal McClure/Volkmer.

    But sure as $#@! can copsuck.

  9. #8
    He's following the agenda like a loyal drone.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptUSA View Post
    #MAGA baby!
    MAG*A


    * For certain definitions of great. May not contain actual greatness. Some restrictions apply.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  12. #10
    Is there a money flowchart associated with these transactions?

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptUSA View Post
    #MAGA baby!
    Guess folks forgot to ask, great again for whom?

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
    Is there a money flowchart associated with these transactions?
    Not likely. Surplus donate to PD. Your PD will either hire new mechanics retired from military for the MRAPs, work something with local Nat'l Guard, or the city/county/university will contract diesel technicians familiar with them. My guess is the second, because it facilitates the mingling of PD with the military. In a few years, we'll see PD formally integrated with the military. They already train together, and many are vets.

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    Not likely. Surplus donate to PD. Your PD will either hire new mechanics retired from military for the MRAPs, work something with local Nat'l Guard, or the city/county/university will contract diesel technicians familiar with them. My guess is the second, because it facilitates the mingling of PD with the military. In a few years, we'll see PD formally integrated with the military. They already train together, and many are vets.
    One World Police.

  16. #14
    These two sources say that:

    1. Military equipment transfers increased under Obama after his "ban."
    2. Obama's "ban" only affected the bayonet.





    If You Thought Obama Was Giving Less Military Gear to Local Police Departments, You Were Wrong
    Despite President Obama's much-touted 2015 executive order, an In These Times investigation reveals evidence that police departments are still receiving as much military hardware from the Pentagon as ever.
    September 16, 2016

    Excerpts:


    But an In These Times investigation provides evidence that, in practice, the president’s much-ballyhooed reforms to the 1033 program have done little to stem the flow of battlefield gear to cops.

    In fact, the total value of equipment distributed through the program actually increased in the year following the ban, according to figures provided to In These Times by Michelle McCaskill, media relations chief for the DOD's Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), which oversees the shipments.

    [Ban 2015
    Gear transferred, 2014-15 = 418 million
    Gear transferred, 2015-16 = 494 million]

    http://inthesetimes.com/features/oba...pment_ban.html


    ***


    Obama's military gear ban affects only the bayonet
    by Tara Copp | May 19, 2015

    Excerpts:

    President Obama's new restrictions on transferring Defense Department equipment to local police, in reality, adds only one new piece of gear to the "banned" list: the bayonet.

    Every other item on the "prohibited equipment list" released Monday was already a no-go for the Defense Department, a senior defense official told the Washington Examiner.


    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ob...rticle/2564691


    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  17. #15
    Peter Kraska, a professor at Eastern Kentucky University’s School of Social Justice Studies and one of the leading researchers of police militarization, told the Guardian that the new [ban] rules [under Obama] were nothing more than a “publicity stunt.”

    http://inthesetimes.com/features/oba...pment_ban.html
    ..
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  18. #16
    We received an MRAP at Purdue, so Obama's indeed full of $#@!. I linked to the details in another topic.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Donald Trump is a dirtbag copsucker, but I don't think this is all it appears. For example, Obama banned armored vehicles on tracks, but most of the transferred armored vehicles to kops ran on wheels. It would be interesting to see a side-by-side comparison of the actual DoD and police lists.

    Obama pulled a publicity stunt and it looks like Donny boy is doing the same. Except in reverse.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    Your PD will either hire new mechanics retired from military for the MRAPs, work something with local Nat'l Guard, or the city/county/university will contract diesel technicians familiar with them.

    Other expenses for this equipment:


    --costly storage
    --costly fuel
    --training
    --premium insurance
    --picking up the vehicles (they're not delivered)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  22. #19
    Together with "Stingray" making the world a safer place.<sarc>

    http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-p...htmlstory.html

    Several years ago, little was known about the StingRay, a powerful surveillance device that imitates the function of a cell tower and captures the signals of nearby phones, allowing law enforcement officers to sweep through hundreds of messages, conversations and call logs.

    The secrecy around the technology, which can ensnare the personal data of criminals and bystanders alike, spurred lawsuits and demands for public records to uncover who was using it and the extent of its capabilities. In California, a 2015 law requires law enforcement agencies to seek permission at public meetings to buy the devices, and post rules for their use online.

    But a Los Angeles Times review of records from 20 of the state’s largest police and sheriff’s departments, plus the Alameda County district attorney’s office, found some agencies have been slow to follow or have ignored the law. Several that partner with federal agencies to work on cases are not subject to the law’s reporting requirements. The result is that little information on StingRay use is available to the public, making it hard to determine how wide a net the surveillance tools cast and what kind of data they gather.

    We're being governed ruled by a geriatric Alzheimer patient/puppet whose strings are being pulled by an elitist oligarchy who believe they can manage the world... imagine the utter maniacal, sociopathic hubris!

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.3D View Post
    Guess folks forgot to ask, great again for whom?
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Dr.3D again.

    It damn sure aint for me.
    "The Patriarch"

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
    One World Police.
    Pretty much.
    "The Patriarch"

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    Not likely. Surplus donate to PD. Your PD will either hire new mechanics retired from military for the MRAPs, work something with local Nat'l Guard, or the city/county/university will contract diesel technicians familiar with them. My guess is the second, because it facilitates the mingling of PD with the military. In a few years, we'll see PD formally integrated with the military. They already train together, and many are vets.
    Provided, of course, your city or county jumps through all the hoops, runs the requisite number of Saturday Night Checkpoints, raises the drinking age and lowers the BAC percentage, and bows to their federal masters in all its whims. Otherwise, they tell the local press, 'Your city would have gotten two Army reject vehicles valued at $83 million, and seven hours of National Guard diesel mechanic attention valued at $27 million, but they refused to screw you as directed so your city lost out on $110 million worth of free stuff!'
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    Provided, of course, your city or county jumps through all the hoops, runs the requisite number of Saturday Night Checkpoints, raises the drinking age and lowers the BAC percentage, and bows to their federal masters in all its whims. Otherwise, they tell the local press, 'Your city would have gotten two Army reject vehicles valued at $83 million, and seven hours of National Guard diesel mechanic attention valued at $27 million, but they refused to screw you as directed so your city lost out on $110 million worth of free stuff!'
    What's in it for the city anyway for taking care of all of this junk?

  27. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
    What's in it for the city anyway?
    Whatever they get for busting all those slightly tipsy "drunks", plus local press headlines saying, 'City secures Federal Military Surplus Valued at $110,000,000'.

    And there's not even a footnote behind 'Valued' indicating that only the military has the chutzpah to value two crappy MRAPs and seven hours time from a weekend warrior at anything over 50K.
    Last edited by acptulsa; 08-27-2017 at 09:49 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    Donald Trump is a dirtbag copsucker, but I don't think this is all it appears. For example, Obama banned armored vehicles on tracks, but most of the transferred armored vehicles to kops ran on wheels. It would be interesting to see a side-by-side comparison of the actual DoD and police lists.

    Obama pulled a publicity stunt and it looks like Donny boy is doing the same. Except in reverse.
    Yes it would be interesting, but that doesn't change the fact the the Donald is a world class copsucker.
    "The Patriarch"

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
    One World Police.
    "The Patriarch"

  31. #27
    Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the change, first reported by USA Today, in a speech to the Fraternal Order of Police in Nashville on Monday.

    The executive order "will ensure that you can get the lifesaving gear that you need to do your job and send a strong message that we will not allow criminal activity, violence, and lawlessness to become the new normal," he said.

    The Obama limitations hurt law enforcement, Sessions added.

    "One sheriff told me earlier this year about how, due to the prior administration's restrictions, the federal government made his department return an armored vehicle that can change the dynamics of an active shooter situation," he said.

    Jim Pasco, the police organization's executive director, said the change "is President Trump making good on a campaign promise." Pasco said he and other police officials discussed the issue with the president and attorney general two times during meetings at the White House.

    Related: Obama: U.S. Cracking Down on ‘Militarization’ of Local Police

    The NAACP Legal Defense fund called the move "exceptionally dangerous and irresponsible."

    Janai Nelson, the group’s associate director counsel, said the policy change "puts more firepower in the hands of police departments that remain largely untrained on matters of racial bias and endangers the public. Inviting the use of military weaponry against our domestic population is nothing short of recasting the public as an enemy."

    Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., laid out his opposition to Trump's move in series of tweets.
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...police-n796581

    https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/902184919979438081

    https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/902185039999401984

    https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/902185345655201792

    https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/902185628590379008

    https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/902185868743643136
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  32. #28
    Does the federal government have the constitutional power to limit what type of weapons states can use?

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Madison320 View Post
    Does the federal government have the constitutional power to limit what type of weapons states can use?
    This is a very complicated question. I don't think there is enough space here to fully explain.

  34. #30
    Keep this in mind when you see "antifa" cheer leading. These people have no idea what they are asking for.
    ..Oo.o~ Rights are Divine ~o.oO..

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Military-Grade Spy Gear Is Flooding into Local Police Departments
    By phill4paul in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-10-2017, 05:38 PM
  2. Trump Would Resume Sales of Militarized Gear to Police
    By phill4paul in forum 2016 Presidential Election: GOP & Dem
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 08-25-2016, 09:43 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-01-2014, 01:52 PM
  4. US Rethinks Giving Excess Military Gear to Police
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-18-2014, 01:23 PM
  5. Police departments across US gobbling up military gear
    By green73 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-31-2013, 06:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •