Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: These US Senators Are Actually Trying to Stop The Government From Doing Something Terrible

  1. #1

    These US Senators Are Actually Trying to Stop The Government From Doing Something Terrible

    U.S. senators are attempting to block the State Department’s deal to sell Saudi Arabia nearly $1.5 billion in weapons, just days after the move was announced by the Obama administration.

    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told Foreign Policy that he would “work with a bipartisan coalition to explore forcing a vote on blocking this sale. Saudi Arabia is an unreliable ally with a poor human rights record. We should not rush to sell them advanced arms and promote an arms race in the Middle East.”

    Congressional opposition to the arms sale came as the Saudi-led, U.S.-backed military coalition broke an unsteady five-month ceasefire in Yemen last week and resumed bombing in the capital city of Sana’a—prompting immediate reports of civilian deaths. On Saturday, Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) reported that an airstrike on a school in northern Yemen killed 10 children and wounded 28 others.

    Paul and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), both of whom sit on the Foreign Relations Committee, are outspoken critics of the coalition.

    “If you talk to Yemeni Americans, they will tell you in Yemen this isn’t a Saudi bombing campaign, it’s a U.S. bombing campaign,” Murphy said in June. “Every single civilian death inside Yemen is attributable to the United States.”

    Congress has 30 days after arms sales are announced to block or modify the deal, but actual intervention is rare.

    A number of human rights organizations have opposed the deal. Oxfam and CODEPINK, among others, launched a petition to “[f]orce a public debate on U.S. participation in the Saudi war in Yemen by advocating for blocking the planned transfer of U.S. tanks and armored vehicles to Saudi Arabia,” which as of Monday had collected 9,500 signatures.

    And this specific arms deal is especially important, according to foreign policy experts. As Robert Naiman explains, “In this particular case, it’s plausible that if we can block the Saudi arms sale, or even come close and have a robust public food fight about it, we can help end the catastrophic Yemen war.”
    The effort is also supported by many lawmakers in the House of Representatives. Over the weekend, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), warned that “the Saudi military’s operational conduct in Yemen and the killing of civilians with U.S.-made weapons have harmed our national security interests, and I will continue to oppose any arms sale that contributes to its operations in that arena.”

    “This approved sale deserves to be scrutinized by Congress rather than rubber-stamped during the summer recess,” he said.
    http://theantimedia.org/senators-sto...ment-terrible/
    A sense of danger gives birth to fear. And fear is the time-honored cross for the crucifixion of liberty.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Scenario to come:

    Senate says "no". Saudi, being the boothole of the world, pinches shut. Americans start screaming for someone to DO something about rocketing oil prices. Senate reconsiders. Saudis get their weapons.

    I say better yet, sell them what they want, only all aircraft and other conveyances have kill switches. Misbehave and we turn the greatest part of your force off via AWACS. Have a nice day, sand-fleas.

    Perhaps we already do it.
    freedomisobvious.blogspot.com

    There is only one correct way: freedom. All other solutions are non-solutions.

    It appears that artificial intelligence is at least slightly superior to natural stupidity.

    Our words make us the ghosts that we are.

    Convincing the world he didn't exist was the Devil's second greatest trick; the first was convincing us that God didn't exist.

  4. #3
    Or just do like we did to Iran in the 70s. We sold them a sizeable fleet of F14s which they have basically never flown, because parts became unattainable pretty much right after the sale.
    There are no crimes against people.
    There are only crimes against the state.
    And the state will never, ever choose to hold accountable its agents, because a thing can not commit a crime against itself.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •