NYT Expose On Chinese Working Conditions In Apple Factories - Microeconomic Help Please

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tttppp

Apple treats their employees like shit because they are incompetent. Treating employee like shit and getting away with it does not mean you are well managed.

---

This is getting ridiculous, you're the same person who told me employers don't care about efficiency, they just want to have slaves and pass the costs on to customers. Ok, you're one of those people who always thinks he knows better and I bet you're a successful businessman now, aren't you? What do you have to show that's so mighty and amazing that Apple should learn from?

Don't tell me "I'm just telling you what I see from a better company" or "If you gave me a chance I'd outdo them". You can't deny Apple is highly profitable, and their customers are extremely loyal, while their workers are not going anywhere anytime soon due to the niche they created. So, what's stopping you from showing me and Apple you're the man, or woman, who is better at making money and making people happy?

Please show off.

From other stories about Chinese labor, even though it sounds like Apple exploits their workers, other US (and Chinese) companies exploit the workers there even worse. Apple is targeted because they are the best known, most popular example.

If you want a truely, completely free market, an employer should be able to exploit the workers as much as they can- even in this country. Profits for the boss or shareholders should be all that matters. If you want that. I think workers should be able to share in what they help to produce. Henry Ford wanted his workers to be able to afford to buy what they were making.

I just feel like creating these type of work conditions only undermines true capitalism and gives way to the socialists and big govt backed unions. If companies are smart they would sacrifice just a little of their productivity or profit to create better working conditions for their workers, which would in the long run lead to more profits and productivity in my opinion. The whole "Well, they;re only option so they should be happy" just does not sit well with me. Slave or Starve are not good options. These people should join and put immense pressure on their employers for better work conditions.

But that is capitalism! Pay the worker as little as he is willing to take to get the job and still be able to attract enough workers to do it while on the other hand selling the goods for as much as the consumer is willing to pay.

Unions, eh? There is an idea! Power to the workers!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheBlackPeterSchiff

I just feel like creating these type of work conditions only undermines true capitalism and gives way to the socialists and big govt backed unions. If companies are smart they would sacrifice just a little of their productivity or profit to create better working conditions for their workers, which would in the long run lead to more profits and productivity in my opinion. The whole "Well, they;re only option so they should be happy" just does not sit well with me. Slave or Starve are not good options. These people should join and put immense pressure on their employers for better work conditions.

---

the price you pay for freedom is that people will be victims, there are many alternatives, but be careful what you wish for because no system is perfect. you oppose socialism because of abuse and distrust, and people oppose capitalism for the same reason.

If you don't sit well with "that's thier only option so they can't complain", feel free to lend a hand, or take away their only option.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by onlyrp

This is getting ridiculous, you're the same person who told me employers don't care about efficiency, they just want to have slaves and pass the costs on to customers. Ok, you're one of those people who always thinks he knows better and I bet you're a successful businessman now, aren't you? What do you have to show that's so mighty and amazing that Apple should learn from?

Don't tell me "I'm just telling you what I see from a better company" or "If you gave me a chance I'd outdo them". You can't deny Apple is highly profitable, and their customers are extremely loyal, while their workers are not going anywhere anytime soon due to the niche they created. So, what's stopping you from showing me and Apple you're the man, or woman, who is better at making money and making people happy?

Please show off.

---

I never said Apple wasn't profitable. I said Apple could be just as profitable and do the right thing. If you can do both, why wouldn't you? Thats why I said they are being dicks for the sake of being dicks.

What I said in this thread is also consistent about what I said in another thread about employers not caring about efficiency. Employers should focus on RESPONSIBILITY. Giving each employee an individual responsibility and holding them 100% accountable for accomplishing it. It doesn't matter if the employee spends 100% of his time working or 10% of his time working. Whats important is he accomplishes his responsibility. This is a very important concept to understand. Just because you have an employee being worked to death doesn't mean he's accomplishing anything. Apple is making the same mistake most companies make and that is assuming that just because you are wasting your employees' time that they are actually accomplishing something. Apple is treating their employees like shit because they believe that treating employees like shit=profits. This is the same formula most companies use and it rarely works. At one company where I was promoted to manager, they had originally used the formula treat people like shit=profits. I switched to a system based on responsibility. I was able to accomplish far more than the other managers and with significantly less staff. Even though the employees accomplished more under me, employee moral went up, not down. So it is possible to get more out of your employees and not treat them like shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by onlyrp

I have some management experience, but I know where it doesn't matter, I know when there are loyal customers who will buy my products and services even if I shot my employees, then I need not care. This is the Apple customer cult that allows them to be abusive to their workers, and until that changes, nobody will care.

I have a hard time believing Apple uses human labor in places that are not necessary or are cheaper automated, care to provide ONE example with evidence? I don't care what you think you can do better than Apple, I know you can't outsell them, so brag to me when you do.

---

Sounds like you have fallen for the typical big corporation management training. We treat people like shit because there is nothing they can do about it. I managed under a big corporation before, where they had a monopoly at my location. Their strategy for I was there was to treat their customers like shit because they had no alternative. I didn't fall for their crap. I ran the place better...treated the customers better...and did so with lower costs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tttppp

Sounds like you have fallen for the typical big corporation management training. We treat people like shit because there is nothing they can do about it. I managed under a big corporation before, where they had a monopoly at my location. Their strategy for I was there was to treat their customers like shit because they had no alternative. I didn't fall for their crap. I ran the place better...treated the customers better...and did so with lower costs.

---

quite the opposite. I have never worked in a big company, but it wouldn't surprise me, after hearing it from you. I too was under the impression that most rich companies are like Google, treating their employees nicely, overpaying, and keep them happy, if they have money, why shouldn't they? But I understand they don't have to, if they believe they have better places to spend their money (such as returning it to stockholders)

You are correct that because customers have no alternative, they can treat them like shit, and that's exactly how loyal Apple users are, they have some alternatives, but they want their Apple, their products just need to remain the same quality with some aesthetic improvement. Did you get the company more business or more profits?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by onlyrp

quite the opposite. I have never worked in a big company, but it wouldn't surprise me, after hearing it from you. I too was under the impression that most rich companies are like Google, treating their employees nicely, overpaying, and keep them happy, if they have money, why shouldn't they? But I understand they don't have to, if they believe they have better places to spend their money (such as returning it to stockholders)

You are correct that because customers have no alternative, they can treat them like shit, and that's exactly how loyal Apple users are, they have some alternatives, but they want their Apple, their products just need to remain the same quality with some aesthetic improvement. Did you get the company more business or more profits?

---

More profits. Same fixed customer base but at lower costs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tttppp

I never said Apple wasn't profitable. I said Apple could be just as profitable and do the right thing. If you can do both, why wouldn't you? Thats why I said they are being dicks for the sake of being dicks.

What I said in this thread is also consistent about what I said in another thread about employers not caring about efficiency. Employers should focus on RESPONSIBILITY. Giving each employee an individual responsibility and holding them 100% accountable for accomplishing it. It doesn't matter if the employee spends 100% of his time working or 10% of his time working. Whats important is he accomplishes his responsibility. This is a very important concept to understand. Just because you have an employee being worked to death doesn't mean he's accomplishing anything. Apple is making the same mistake most companies make and that is assuming that just because you are wasting your employees' time that they are actually accomplishing something. Apple is treating their employees like shit because they believe that treating employees like shit=profits. This is the same formula most companies use and it rarely works. At one company where I was promoted to manager, they had originally used the formula treat people like shit=profits. I switched to a system based on responsibility. I was able to accomplish far more than the other managers and with significantly less staff. Even though the employees accomplished more under me, employee moral went up, not down. So it is possible to get more out of your employees and not treat them like shit.

---

I am not convinced they can do both. I am specifically saying Apple's unique market allows them to not do both, and you've not given me ONE example of evidence to the contrary.

" also consistent about what I said in another thread about employers not caring about efficiency." no, it is not. Either they care about money, or they don't care about money. Caring about efficiency is caring about money.

"Apple is treating their employees like shit because they believe that treating employees like shit=profits."
Are you talking about corporate Apple in the US, retail and corporate offices? or sweatshops? Treating employees like shit does not equal profits, treating them better will almost always cost more. I agree it's possible, but that's a risk they're not willing to take and until you have something to show, nobody cares how you criticize them, they'll continue to have their cult customers feeding them money.

Let me know when you kill Apple.