BenSwann.com: ObamaCare Provision: "Forced" Home Inspections

Printable View

08-14-2013, 07:16 PM
FrankRep

BenSwann.com: ObamaCare Provision: "Forced" Home Inspections

ObamaCare Provision: "Forced" Home Inspections

BenSwann.com
Aug. 14, 2013

Gets better and better...
08-14-2013, 07:17 PM
phill4paul

I. Will. Not. Comply.

Damn this is easy.
08-14-2013, 07:24 PM
DamianTV

There it is. The Camera in your Living Room. The "Inspection" is a Foot in the Door, and that is all they need for EVERYTHING else that follows.
08-14-2013, 07:27 PM
asurfaholic

Quote:

Originally Posted by phill4paul

I. Will. Not. Comply.

Damn this is easy.

Excuse us?

http://www.addictinginfo.org/wp-cont.../swat-team.jpg
08-14-2013, 07:38 PM
shane77m

It would be fun to have flashbang proof windows installed in your house. Imagine the look on their eyes when one of those or a tear gas canister bounces back at them.
08-14-2013, 07:42 PM
tod evans

Quote:

Originally Posted by shane77m

It would be fun to have flashbang proof windows installed in your house. Imagine the look on their eyes when one of those or a tear gas canister bounces back at them.

Lexan, good enough for banks......
08-14-2013, 08:49 PM
KEEF

I here and now support it <sarc> ...I mean we had to pass the bill in order to find out what was in it <sarc>.

No really, I was pissed when some dumb fuck swung by my door to see if I had a dog and if the dog was registered. I unfortunately do not have a dog, but was kinda hoping I did just to get it to bark at the guy when I told him at the door that I do not have a dog.

So dear American people... Ben Swan just listed a few things that could get you a visit from the FEDs, but what if they track some of your meta data and find you eat fast food more than once a day? You regularly frequent certain webpages that are not "approved by the state"... hell it said right there that home schooled families are on the target list.

WAKE THE FUCK UP... IT IS NOT FOR THE GREATER GOOD, IT IS ABOUT CONTROL! IT IS NOT TO KEEP YOU SAFE, IT IS ABOUT CONTROL! IT IS NOT SO THAT EVERYONE GETS EQUAL COVERAGE, IT IS ABOUT CONTROL! IT IS NOT ABOUT (fill in the blank with anything a pundit and/or politician tells you), IT IS ABOUT CONTROL!

Hell at this rate, people in 20 years will be discussing, mind you not irate about, but just discussing whether it is OK for a FED to pay you a home visit to give you a prostate exam because you failed to swing in for your post-forty annual physical/ two finger shocker exam. Imagine the pro arguments... you have to let those FED fingers up your ass all in the name of 'Merica; if you don't like it, you must be an extremest.
08-14-2013, 11:35 PM
Mani

Quote:

Originally Posted by KEEF

I here and now support it <sarc> ...I mean we had to pass the bill in order to find out what was in it <sarc>.

No really, I was pissed when some dumb fuck swung by my door to see if I had a dog and if the dog was registered. I unfortunately do not have a dog, but was kinda hoping I did just to get it to bark at the guy when I told him at the door that I do not have a dog.

So dear American people... Ben Swan just listed a few things that could get you a visit from the FEDs, but what if they track some of your meta data and find you eat fast food more than once a day? You regularly frequent certain webpages that are not "approved by the state"... hell it said right there that home schooled families are on the target list.

WAKE THE FUCK UP... IT IS NOT FOR THE GREATER GOOD, IT IS ABOUT CONTROL! IT IS NOT TO KEEP YOU SAFE, IT IS ABOUT CONTROL! IT IS NOT SO THAT EVERYONE GETS EQUAL COVERAGE, IT IS ABOUT CONTROL! IT IS NOT ABOUT (fill in the blank with anything a pundit and/or politician tells you), IT IS ABOUT CONTROL!

Hell at this rate, people in 20 years will be discussing, mind you not irate about, but just discussing whether it is OK for a FED to pay you a home visit to give you a prostate exam because you failed to swing in for your post-forty annual physical/ two finger shocker exam. Imagine the pro arguments... you have to let those FED fingers up your ass all in the name of 'Merica; if you don't like it, you must be an extremest.

You must spread some reputation around before giving it to KEEF again.
08-14-2013, 11:39 PM
ClydeCoulter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mani

You must spread some reputation around before giving it to KEEF again.

'

Already did :D
08-15-2013, 12:02 AM
Kodaddy

It's for the children.......................

....puke...
08-15-2013, 12:39 AM
DamianTV

Quote:

• Families where mom is not yet 21.
• Families where someone is a tobacco user.
• Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities.
• Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.

Great requirements. We have to intervene on those single moms, smokers, poor, and US Military.
08-15-2013, 08:51 AM
ThePenguinLibertarian

Read the whole thing guys, it gets worse. 12,000,000 will be allocated to states and jurisdiction which part of this law affects. Even though they are aware the states already have such programs.