Originally Posted by
Tpoints
Do you recall the best example of a case where you believe the veil should be pierced? Is the problem the lack of a better doctrine? Or just the lack of courts using it?
Also, can't the problem be solved by suing the owner/board directly? I mean, after all, companies cannot act without the string pullers, so what's wrong with suing string pullers? (Let's assume, you are the plaintiff and you've been wronged by a company's actions, and you either know or have no reason to believe to the contrary that the string pullers made the direct decisions)
The government doesn't seem to have a problem peircing veils or prosecuting criminals if a company committed a crime in any way, is this problem only a problem when plaintiffs are seeking money?