Uh, that is a a terrible argument. Let me see if I get this straight.. you are saying that chemtrails aren't real because they can't possibly carry enough chemicals? I laugh at the 'do some math' quip too. Implying that because I have not 'done some math' I am ignorant or moronic. Please give me the variables and I will gladly 'do some math.' For starters, it would to help to know what they are spraying... you know, dissipation rates, concentration, etc. Your 'math' is obviously flawed in that you couldn't begin to tell me that. Saying that chemicals released at those altitudes would be ineffective is another flaw in your logic. That would really depend on what they were trying to do would it not? Directly poisoning people would surely not be as effective at 35,000 ft compared to a fly-over at 500 ft. The covered area at 35,000 ft would be so large the chemicals would largely be uneffective. (not make you die quickly) That is not to say that cancer rates would not be affected in the long run i.e. subtle depopulation. I'm not even saying this is the case. What about geoengineering? Are you aware of Operation Popeye? We have done extensive research into controlling weather patterns; whether that was to be used as weaponry or for humanaterian motives i.e. hurricane displacement etc. You are uninformed of what you are speaking on. The ridiculous assumption that planes couldn't carry enough chemicals when you don't know (and I don't know!) what they are or what the purposes of said chemicals is supposed to be as the sole basis of your arguement is troubling.