"I've got some real concerns about this movement within the Republican party and the Tea Party movement to sort of refashion conservatism and I will vocally and publicly oppose it"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLQnoVpkyqc
"I've got some real concerns about this movement within the Republican party and the Tea Party movement to sort of refashion conservatism and I will vocally and publicly oppose it"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLQnoVpkyqc
+1 on this
Someone has already done it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TVoVqvt74
I would have started this on 33sec. And leave out all that libertarian stuff in the beginning.
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Xar
Playpianoking did this. He's the same person who created the "2002 Predictions" video.Quote:
Originally Posted by lakerssuck92
"I've got some real concerns about this movement within the Republican party and the Tea Party movement to sort of refashion conservatism and I will vocally and publicly oppose it"
Uh...well, that doesn't really mean he is opposing the Tea Party though. This can sound like it was taken out of context unless the full piece where he is talking is shown.
"I've got some real concerns about this movement within the Republican party and the Tea Party movement
Bringing more evidence into what he was talking about would help. Just saying...putting stuff out taken out of context is something they have done to Paul countless times and i wouldnt want us being guilty of it either.
EDIT: Ok, he is opposing LIBERTARIANISM. Erm...i am really lost here, am i missing some kind of inside joke? :confused: If someone was trying to chop it and make it look like he was opposing the Tea Party, well that is just stupid and not going to work and will be easily debunked. Without even seeing the beginning, it still wouldn't prove that he is specifically talking about opposing the Tea Party.
The pile of shit stacks higher and higher each day.
delete duplicate
Does he mean,Quote:
Originally Posted by Student Of Paulism
I've got some real concerns about (this movement within the Republican party) and the Tea Party movement
or
I've got some real concerns about this movement within (the Republican party and the Tea Party movement)
I would say the 1st because of the extra word movement at the end, but am not sure. edit: listening to it again, he pauses after saying Republican party, so that makes it more likely option 1 above is the correct interpretation.
He means just what he said, i really don't get what you are trying to break down. He's talking about Libertarianism, did you watch the original vid?
It would make a nice video to stop the video after he makes his statements about libertarianism and the tea party. Then go to a blank screen and linger there for PLENTY of time with only the quote below. Linger long enough so that Reagan's words can be read, re-read again and given time to really sink in.
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism." -- Ronald Reagan
He does not know what Libertarian means. He is done after SC. Also the other Rick.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_...7Rickrolled%27
Here's what folks are missing. Santorum didn't just attack "libertarianism". He showed a fundamental misunderstanding of the constitution. The question was about the "public accommodation" section of the civil rights act. Well that section is unconstitutional. I agree with the goals and some of the results of the civil rights act. But unconstitutional means were used to get there. It requires the expansive reading of the interstate commerce clause where any action that can arguably in the aggregate have an effect on interstate commerce can be regulated by the federal government. So if that reading is correct, then there is nothing unconstitutional about "Obamacare". After all healthcare clearly has an aggregate effect on interstate commerce.
But remember, this is not the only damning Santorum clip. How about him saying that government has to be "big if people don't live their lives 'correctly'"? How is that different from Karl Marx and the dictatorship of the proletariat?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KjCZXfhjoWA
Or how about Santorum saying that he's against those who want to cut taxes and cut regulations?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1Gwwmm-cQxU
Santorum claims that low taxes and regulations is "radical individualism" and that nowhere has that "succeeded as a culture". Is this idiot ignorant of the American frontier?
So don't just take one video. Take several and splice them together. Make him answer for being the big government radical Christian jihadist he is.
LOL @ Tom Davis reference in first video of last post.
Sounds like he just finished reading 5000 Year Leap