It's a lie that Republicans trash talk immigrants publicly, and you proved it?
Let's see what you really proved...
Can't you even go back and edit your own posts before claiming you don't do what you do?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuarta.../#6f6002c23571
Quote:
In his farewell address to the nation as president, Reagan declared, “I've spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity.”
Ronald Reagan closed the thought by adding, “And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here.”
You know, I'm glad you brought this up.
Why didn't Ron Paul run again for president in 1992 after his LP run in 1988?
Because he went to work for Pat Buchanan's team in his run in 1992. (which I supported)
One of the reasons for that, was because he opposed the 1986 Amnesty Act. (And yes, I am aware he was not in Congress at the time of the final voice vote)
Rated 83% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.
Paul scores 83% by USBC on immigration issues
OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2005-2006 USBC scores as follows:
0%-30%: open-border stance (approx. 197 members)
30%-70%: mixed record on open borders (approx. 70 members)
70%-100%: sealed-border stance (approx. 202 members)
U.S. Border Control, founded in 1988, is a non-profit, tax-exempt, citizen's lobby. USBC is dedicated to ending illegal immigration by securing our nation's borders and reforming our immigration policies. USBC [works with] Congressmen to stop amnesty; seal our borders against terrorism and illegal immigration; and, preserve our nation's language, culture and American way of life for future generations.
Our organization accepts no financial support from any branch of government. All our support comes from concerned citizens who appreciate the work we are doing to seal our borders against drugs, disease, illegal migration and terrorism and wish to preserve our nation's language, culture and heritage for the next generations.
Source: USBC website 06n-USBC on Dec 31, 2006
In 1986 I voted for the Simpson-Mazzoli immigration bill because we were told it would solve the problem of massive illegal immigration. In his diaries, President Ronald Reagan said he was going to sign the bill because we had to regain control of our borders. The Simpson-Mazzoli bill contained three promises:
The government would make a concerted effort to control the borders.
An effective employer verification program would ensure that only legal workers were hired.
One-time amnesty would be granted for people illegally in the United States.
All three promises were broken. The government has made no serious effort to control our borders. Employers continue knowingly to hire illegal immigrants without any real fear of punishment.
Yes you did, you are the one lying about what I said.
Quote:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by acptulsa http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/...post-right.png
A good majority of voters are tribal, and immigrants can go there, go here (especially here), go anywhere on the internet and learn the Republican Tribe hates their tribe.
Liar:
Quote:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by acptulsa http://www.ronpaulforums.com/images/...post-right.png
A good majority of voters are tribal, and immigrants can go there, go here (especially here), go anywhere on the internet and learn the Republican Tribe hates their tribe.
How much of the world is more socialist than the U.S? Mexico is not, for example.
Or would you care to make a religious assertion that it is?
Yes, thanks for the warning that you're posting nonsense. Or would you like to post one single example from history when nobody opposed immigrants as immigrants?
LOL
Mexico is much more socialist than the US and so is most of the world:
Illegal Migrants Come Here as Ready-made Democrats — Here’s Why
Probably because it was not that big of an issue in 1980
https://www.mlive.com/resizer/g742e8...migrant12.jpeg
The land mines planted in 1965 took a few years to blow up.
Funding of anti Soviet proxy warfare in Central and South America and NAFTA destroyed us.
Your proof is a New American article asserting Mexican schools are nearly as Marxist as U.S. schools?
Seriously?
You mean that 1986 law that was signed by Ronald Reagan, right?
That's not what you said. That does not matter.
1. A certain portion of the population always opposes immigrants.
2. Trump supporters did not make any distinctions at all, much less any that Spanish speakers could comprehend, when they spent 2016 chanting, "Build That Wall!"
Try reading the whole thing, this is in the part I posted:
You can also just look at them electing AMLO and his policies.Quote:
Examining this Mexican Marxism’s roots, Showalter writes that in “the wake of the Spanish civil war, rabid leftists fled the country and first landed in Puerto Rico. Some stayed, but Mexico extended to them the entire educational establishment at the university level, and from there, they spread into the school system, to the earliest levels. They converted what had been education to Marxist indoctrination, and in the absence of any other education, it was all the children of these countries ever learned.”
While this no doubt must have had a devastating effect, hard-core Mexican leftism actually predates the Spanish Civil War (1936 and 1939). In fact, a vicious, anti-Christian Mexican regime that took power in the 1920s under President Plutarco Calles would often imprison people “for wearing religious items, saying ‘Adios’ in public (which literally means ‘with God’), or even questioning the laws. Public worship was a crime punishable by hanging or firing squad,” as The Catholic Gene relates.
This led to the uprising of faithful peasants known as Cristero War, which claimed 90,000 lives and was movingly and accurately portrayed in the spectacular 2012 film For Greater Glory (trailer below).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QUb_StcVzg
As to Mexican leftism, it not only didn’t start just when the Spanish Civil War ended; it also can’t be blamed entirely on formal (mis)education. (This is true of leftism everywhere.) Today, the media and entertainment, especially, play a huge role, as popular culture shapes popular thinking. These entities also influence the degree of virtue in the people — and virtue, or lack thereof, is what really informs about a society’s fate and fatal mistakes.
And what does that part of the article talk about right off the bat? The entire educational experience?
Can we cut to the bottom line? In 2015, the U.S. (population 321 million) spent thirty percent of its GDP on welfare (not counting corporate and agricultural welfare) and Mexico (population 127 million) spent less than eight percent of a smaller GDP.
That makes them more socialist how, exactly?
No one is enabling it besides RINOs democrats and political thugs. The liberals literally use political scare tactics to create useful idiots to create this narrative. Its not enabling thats the problem. Progressive democrats run the tech companies that everyone uses and censor conservatives.