This is some seriously sick and deranged @#%*.
http://world.time.com/2013/05/12/atr...for-the-worse/
This is some seriously sick and deranged @#%*.
http://world.time.com/2013/05/12/atr...for-the-worse/
animals
I thought humans were unclean to eat like pigs? :confused: Anyway, we just sent some MREs to the rebels. Clearly this happened because they were hungry. /sarcasm
so TIME had it and sat on it because they knew it was damaging to the terrorists cause.
Thanks MSM! Keep discrediting yourselves.
Such noble freedom fighters. Let's ARM them!
Atrocities on both sides.
Quote:
War is rarely anything but violent, but in Syria, where more than 70,000 civilians have been killed in the conflict since it started as a peaceful uprising inspired by the Arab Spring more than two years ago, the savagery has reached ghoulish proportions. And it seems that soldiers on both sides of the war are committing what appear to be crimes of war at least in part so that those acts can be viewed on the Internet. The ubiquity of camera phones and social media are enabling a mixture of propaganda, intimidation and boastful exhibitionism. In this, the first YouTube war, videos have driven the conflict even as they document its horrors.
the 70,000 dead figure you often see cited is a complete lie from the UN.
Can you share more reliable figures? (it does not specify which side is responsible for how many- both have killed people).
Savages. We have no reason to have any part in their bloodbath.
No. They just used humane methods like bullets, missiles, tanks and bombs.
What bothers me on the issue is that some seem to treat Assad as a victim and the rebel forces as the only bad guys. It started when tanks were sent after peaceful protestors. I don't support either side. Would responces be any different if the country name was made the US and the leader's name Obama? I think it would. And neither would be justified in their actions.
Syrians are the victims.
Perhaps you've not heard about the peaceful protests that got sniped (paid snipers). Both protesters and law/soldiers were sniped at to cause havoc. Shoot soldiers, they think protesters are firing on them, etc...
Syrians are the victims. Now they are fighting AlCiada supported insurgents. Not saying that ALL are non-Syrian. The "west" just fucks up so much stuff.
Don't ever forget Anderson Cooper spend a whole year trying to frame the Syrian conflict as good (rebels) vs evil (Assad). Guy should lose his broadcasting privlages for that war propoganda.
wheres the damn video?
Amazing over 2 years later and the CIA/Mi5/Saudi/U.A.E./Kuwaiti savages haven't run out of bullets or bombs. Geez, with all the $ Billions in "HUMANITARIAN AID, Syria would be covered in blankets, food, shelter, by now. Oh and I never knew, AID to help the people included It's no secret, former Army General Wesley Clark filled-in listeners years ago about the agenda of overthrowing the governments/countries around Israel. It was the truth, and the TPTB ensured Clark didn't advance in politics/public.
As an example, if a foreign nation(s) armed Americans to revolt against the government for their oppressive crackdown on protestors, militarized police forcing people out of their own homes at gunpoint, no knock raids shooting and killing people, etc, what would the U.S. media/ U.N. call it, "Free America Army"? Would the press be calling the the US government, a genocidal regime and war crimes against humanity if they attacked Americans? Came close to that like in; Boston, G8 summits, OWS... All about controlling the media, censoring the data, wire tapping, lying to the uninformed public, and complete control of freedoms. Just like the joke of a law of no protesting when Secret Service agents are present, it wasn't a problem for 246 years, but now it's is a problem, especially with all the weaponry and protection that no other president has ever received? Take your typical example of BS mind control media headlines in all the US/ally newspapers, "Israel strikes Syria, hits arms from Iran". What if the headline said, "Syria strikes Israel, hits arms from U.S." I presume only Israel and the U.S. can initiate unprovoked attacks/strikes/killings, but no one else can do the same, especially when it's no secret these same covert attacking governments, fund terrorists and wars for their military industrial complexes and corporate thirst for Oil/Natural resources/territory. Same totalitarian foreign nations are arming domestic mundanes, shipping in terrorists, providing weapons of mass destruction in Syria, setup their phony leaders, bribe defector$ a$ public mouthpiece$, torture, and they're called "Free Syrian Army"? Maybe free to terrorize as a institutionalized barbarism, that's about it. They blew up Television stations, car bombs around Damascus killing innocent civilians, assassinated government officials/foreign advisers, all with an endless supply of western funded weaponry.
All this Syrian terrorism would end within a month, if the US and their partner nations in crime, stopped funding & arming the terrorists. It's a simple as that. Yeap, it's just another; Libya, Egypt, Mali, Somalia, Kosovo, and Iraq... same cookie cutter covert MO. How quickly many forget the Libya's freedom fighters were funded by the same brutal governments that have a track record of killing around the planet. Boy those western energy companies are loving that sweet crude/NATGAS out of Libya, and now, UK is in negotiations to sell billions in weapons to Libya.
Michael Scheuer, "Wherever there is trouble in the world, you can count on the CIA being right in the middle of it"
Oh Assad sucks. As Siebol Edmonds pointed out we used to send our detainees to him to be tortured! (Yes that is 100% verified in the book "Ghost Plane". And I hope you'll watch her video on the Boston Bombing. Maybe you'll learn something.)
That said, we're directly or indirectly helping cannibalistic members of Al Qaeda. And that should bother you. I was against foreign aid to Assad. I still am. I'm also against aid that helps cannibal terrorists. And frankly I don't believe the claim that "it started when tanks were sent after peaceful protestors." How do you know that's actually true?
The opposition is comprised of over 200 groups. As Qaeda is just one. They welcome the support of anybody willing to help their cause.
Reminds me of the arguments liberal and Planned Parenthood supporters use to justify govt funding of it. They say PP offers hundreds of medical services and abortion is just one of the hundered, but they will leave out the fact that spending on abortion take the vast majority of their spending. So yea, the foreign terrorists just happen to be 1 of 200 groups - a number which I doubt - but they certainly make up the vast majority of the rebel fighters.
So fuck the em and fuck the Syria rebels if they are willing to expose their fellow country men to these babaric and murderous thugs
So human heart is halal. Good to know.
Here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oth-tooth.html
Wait, they're the GOOD guys?
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/05/w...good-guys.html
How does the old saying go? If you need support for a war, start one. (Something like that.)Quote:
I don't think the Obama administration was particularly keen in following the neocon cheerleading for yet another American invasion in the Middle East, this time in Syria. But this sort of thing will pretty much eliminate any public enthusiasm for one, especially in light of the disastrous "Arab Spring" that, as I correctly predicted, led to rule by the Muslim Brotherhood rather than the much-ballyhooed secular democratic liberalization that was supposedly in the works
Note that I said we're directly or indirectly helping cannibalistic members of Al Qaeda. If you think none of the aid we're sending gets to the most effective fighters of the opposition, who happen to be Al Qaeda and got their training killing Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan, then you are kidding yourself.
Going to be interesting to see peoples' faces when the Israeli King shows up.(He'll likely be the first).
Tarpley refers to them as NATO death squads.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcfpXEAL3jA
Are you retarded? Seriously. Because only someone with a truly deficient reading capacity would reach the same conclusion you did. I clearly said directly or indirectly. In other words. I also clearly said the Al Qaeda faction were the most effective fighters. So how you stretched that to mean "all the opposition" defies even RPF shill logic. And yes. I do oppose all aid to this conflict as does Ron Paul and any other non interventionist. Are you an interventionist now?
All,,?
I'm sure some are not cannibals.
Most are mercenaries,,hired to fight. Some may be idealist idiots sucked in to someone elses war.
A few are even Syrians who want to grab power, ,or pay back political enemies.
One thing for sure, it is not is an uprising of the Syrian people.
Holy shit. This is so fucked.
We just need to stay out of it completely.