Rand kicking ass...
https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...mueller-report
Rand kicking ass...
https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...mueller-report
Why block it , wouldn't this just expose the Deep State, witch-hunt shenanigans?
What is it that the government does that we shouldn't want to know about?
IDIOT MUCH?
What are you lips tired from.......:facepalm:
I don't click links, the title says:
Rand Paul blocks resolution calling for release of Mueller report .
Words mean things, had the OP accurately titled the thread;
''....blocks 'Truncated' excerpt release....''
It would have made sense, you sure as fk don't.
Rand already told us he intended to keep doing this, and he told us exactly why.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...Mueller-Report
https://www.paul.senate.gov/news/icy...bama-involved’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSc_huLymSw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSc_huLymSwQuote:
...Under Senate rules, any one senator can request that any bill or resolution be passed. But because it requires the signoff of every senator, any one senator can also block their request.
Paul objected because Warner wouldn't agree to amend the nonbinding House-passed resolution to include provisions calling for the public release of communications between several Obama-era officials including former President Obama, former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.
Paul argued that Congress still needs to figure out the "entire story" including the origins of the investigation into President Trump's campaign and a controversial research dossier compiled against then-candidate Trump.
"I think it's very important that we not turn our country into this back and forth where each successive party tries to use the apparatus of government to investigate the previous president," Paul said.
"What we don't know is was President Obama told that the evidence to get this investigation started was paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign? We need to know that," Paul continued.
Paul has warned that he would block the resolution backing the Mueller report's release unless information about the opposition research dossier compiled against Trump was also released. He first blocked the House-passed resolution last week.
"It was so scandalous and so unverified and has turned out to be untrue, and yet this was the basis for the beginning of the investigation. This was the basis for doing something extraordinary," Paul added on Thursday of the dossier...
He's right... The results of the investigation are inadmissible if it was an illegal investigation in the first place. It is a bad precedent to allow happen.
When the House voted on this, it occurred to me that it should be blocked unless all of the other related information was released too. I like the way Rand’s thinking...Quote:
Paul objected because Warner wouldn't agree to amend the nonbinding House-passed resolution to include provisions calling for the public release of communications between several Obama-era officials including former President Obama, former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.
Paul argued that Congress still needs to figure out the "entire story" including the origins of the investigation into President Trump's campaign and a controversial research dossier compiled against then-candidate Trump.
And I like Graham’s reasoning on this too.Quote:
In addition to Paul, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has twice blocked the House resolution from being passed, arguing that Barr is currently working with Mueller to determine what from the report can be released.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has also blocked the House-passed resolution.
Graham voiced opposition to the resolution, citing Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer's (D-N.Y.) refusal to amend it to include a provision calling on the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel to investigate alleged department misconduct in the handling of the investigation into 2016 Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton's email use and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications related to Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
Absolutely key.
I wish Congress had the balls to prosecute Hillary , that is our biggest 'looming' problem.
I applaud Rand, but we all know that no one at the top is ever going to Prison, to be truthful this
would be a waste of time , if not for the fact the President can't be further tarred and feathered in the media
through Truncated and selective reports.
What have you ever written here or anywhere else that was more than a couple of sentences , (usually
peppered with personal attacks).
What is your best work, show us anything you've written that you feel contributed to the support of
our Freedom and our Republic, that was paragraphs/pages , not just a couple of 'cute' lines and personal attacks.........
I can't wait to read it.
I don't click links, I already said that, you chose to pretend not to 'get it' .
I do read.
Do you read?
Do you understand what the title says;
''Rand Paul blocks resolution calling for release of Mueller report ''
It doesn't say 'Truncated' , or 'Selective disclosure' etc.
That means the 'Report' period.
:frog:
Right. You don't click links. You just reply to what they say without reading it.
You do read. *What* you read is anyone's guess. But it's obviously something other than whatever you're actually supposedly talking about.
And we might be forgiven for assuming that when you read, you do it at the same level you write.
Don't get me wrong. Writing a hasty response to a thread title alone without reading even a few sentences of what it's about is not a big deal. It happens.
It's just funny the way you doubled-down when you got called on it, like you getting something wrong because you responded to it without reading it was everyone else's fault. You could have just said, "Oops, sorry, you're right. Carry on." But I get the feeling you don't say things like that as a rule, regardless if the situation calls for it.
Such as the way I need a dictionary because thehill.com used the misleading bill title in their headline, and Warlord posted the link under the same?
Are you sure? I've never seen any reason to believe he's capable of it.
What have you ever written here or anywhere else that was more than a couple of sentences , (usually
peppered with personal attacks).
What is your best work, show us anything you've written that you feel contributed to the support of
our Freedom and our Republic, that was paragraphs/pages , not just a couple of 'cute' lines and personal attacks.........
I can't wait to read it.
Let's see. Do we have more repetitive low value posts here, or more personal insults?
I'm losing count. @Bryan, can I borrow some fingers?
Ooops , no you're not right, rarely are , you just love to turn things into arguments,
I read the title and stated 5 times that I don't click links.
''Rand Paul blocks resolution calling for release of Mueller report ''
I also stated how the title of body of the OP could have been easily made clear
and concise, but of course that is not why you're here, your not here to care
whether something is right or wrong, you come here to harass and flip even
agreements into arguments.
Enjoy, and I compliment you on your partner ac, are you on the same pc, diff
vpns? (rhetorical)
:frog:
lmao
You launched your personal attacks not me.
What have you ever written here or anywhere else that was more than a couple of sentences , (usually
peppered with personal attacks).
What is your best work, show us anything you've written that you feel contributed to the support of
our Freedom and our Republic, that was paragraphs/pages , not just a couple of 'cute' lines and personal attacks.........
I can't wait to read it.
I suppose you also think the PATRIOT Act somehow benefits patriots?[/QUOTE]
lol
You're not going to fool Bryan , you launched the personal attacks as usual, I never do.
The thread was very peaceful but you had to continue your vendetta with personal attacks.
I'm still wondering why you chime in at every opportunity to attack me , and why you
are on this site.