Printable View
"You should work on the facts"
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Rand Paul again.
If I were Rand, I would have brought up too that I never explicitly said that Eric Ciarmella was the whistleblower.
This bimbo with a microphone runs up to Rand and starts asking him why he broke the law by naming the whistleblower.
I mean words can't express how idiotic that is.
It's like someone in the witness protection program being sent an army of police officers and choppers and tanks to provide surveillance around a house, and when people walking by ask what's going on they're threatened with arrest for blowing someone's cover.
W.T.F.
Send her back :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by nobody's_hero
I thought he said he didn't name the whistleblower and that he doesn't even know who the whistleblower is.Quote:
Originally Posted by nobody's_hero
He may have. In any case he simply revealed the question he asked to the media outside of the senate hearing. The media are the ones who responded by accusing Rand of naming him. So they knew, and they played themselves by bringing it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by nikcers
John Roberts would have done better to protect Eric if he'd simply read the question.
You just outed a whistleblower. Banned.Quote:
Originally Posted by nobody's_hero
He who shall not be named. What a crock.
I helped with some satire forums in 2008. On one we were trying to attract extreme neocon/law and order types who favored Giuliani. We gave temp bans out like candy.
One of my favorite was we had a list of words that were banned and censored, but no one knew what those words were, including the moderators. So if a person posted a long post about how much they liked Guiliani, we would censor the whole post. We had many long threads where we kept censoring posts where people asked what the censored words were. Even if those censored words weren't in the post we still censored and give the reason that people might find out which words weren't censored and figure out which were. The reason we gave was that the censored words were so horrible that we didn't want our forum members to even think them. If someone still complained, they got a time out for a few hours. The bans actually kept the membership active because when the short bans were up they were still angry (probably even more so) and it kept everything heated.
Forum trolling is so much more fun if you are a moderator.
They should make me Chief Justice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warlord
He needs to keep explaining it,