Are these "constitutional" sheriffs who are taking a stand against Obama's and Feinstein's latest gun control proposals also taking a stand against gun owners needing a "permit" to carry concealed in their county? If not, why not?
Printable View
Are these "constitutional" sheriffs who are taking a stand against Obama's and Feinstein's latest gun control proposals also taking a stand against gun owners needing a "permit" to carry concealed in their county? If not, why not?
good question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tod
I sent it to CSPOA and Oathkeepers....Quote:
Originally Posted by torchbearer
One step at a time.There are many thousands of unconstitutional laws on the books,State and Federal.For instance,I think all drug laws are unconstitutional,the18th amendment outlawed booze,what amendment outlawed pot or heroin?
I will accept and relish any sheriff who states that he will not enforce further attacks on the 2nd amendment just as I would a sheriff who states that he will no longer enforce pot laws or any one or two or thousands that I consider unconstitutional.
I call that a good question, but suggest we address the more pressing matters first.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tod
I suspect some may be in liberty but not "too much" of it... to turn a phrase.
An ounce of pot is a felony in many(thousands?)counties in America.Would you denigrate or refuse to support a sheriff in one of these counties if he refused to enforce any and all pot laws in his jurisdiction but did not do the same for heroin?
If not,why not?
FWIW, I never did hear back from OK or CSPOA....:(
Color me perplexed...:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tod