nayjevin
Member

https://twitter.com/dbenner83/status/1781446955232600250 1781446955232600250 https://twitter.com/ThomasEWoods/status/1782160619556290627 https://twitter.com/ComicDaveSmith/status/1782174446842753190

Squatters TAKEOVER Gordon Ramsay Restaurant https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/squatters-takeover-gordon-ramsay:b {Actual Justice Warrior | 21 April 2024} In this video I discuss the squatting situation going on in the UK at a Gordon Ramsay restaurant & explain how even in the UK no one is safe from squatters. Sources: Original Reporting Segment Go Subscribe: https://youtu.be/RUgtEX3kL7Y Gordon Get Out Compilation: https://youtu.be/0d9dWnABJqY

THREAD: What Are Mises’s Six Lessons?

THREAD: UFC Fighter Moicano says to read Mises

THREAD: MTG Files Motion to Vacate Speaker Johnson

It's long overdue ... The caning of Charles Sumner

THREAD: Brandon Herrera for Congress (TX-23)

//

Well, that didn't seem to settle much of anything. Uygur with his weak virtue signaling, apparently thinking that if he talks against Turks, he will be taken as honest and trustworthy. Oy. Dave Smith is nothing to write home about either. Prager has his moments, but isn't really that good at debate. The woman was mostly on the money, whoever she is. But there seems to have been some fundamentals missed. For one thing, we have no idea whether what we see in reports regarding either side of this giant bowl of liquid feces is reflective of truth. The Israelis have been up to all manner of chicanery for 75 years. One can debate whether circumstance drove them to it, or if they are just a raft of scummy people of whom perhaps the world would have benefitted had the Final Solution been successfully concluded. I'm unwilling to assume anything on that question. The same may be said of the Arabs of the region, however less clever and artful they may be. I don't trust any of them, taken statistically. Praeger made a fair point when he stated that the deaths of civilian Arabs lies squarely at Hamas' feet. They started it, operationally speaking, and hid among the people they are supposed to protect. There can be no question of their cowardice. The woman also made an important point about war, that it is and ought to be horrific. It is, after all, war. It is interesting to observe how few people hold a reasonable grasp of the most fundamental nature of warfare. These dummies, Smith and Uygur, are of that ilk (as are many in the military who should know better) wants warfare to be comparatively sanitary. This is patent idiocy. War should be out and out slaughter. It should be so atrocious, people are unable to wrap their heads around it; so horrifying that even the so-called "hawks" quit their moaning and scheming for it like covetous street whores they are. Much as is the case with freedom, the mean man wants all the benefits of war without those aspect of it that they find unappealing. "OOoooo... don't kill civilians... it's immoral...", as if two armies murdering each other en masse were somehow otherwise. I love how people rationalize the most absurd things, while condemning that which can actually be justified. This debate was pointless, IMO. The real questions were not treated in a way that addresses the fundamentals of the issue, which is the only way to get to the truth. They kept the discussion up in the haze of comparative irrelevancies and they largely ignored the fact that we're not privy to the whole truth.

LMAO even (see @ 9:45): When You Tell a Cop "NO." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6ztIBqMfeY {LackLuster | 20 April 2024}

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13270895/cricket-meat-mince-eat-insects.html

https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1781756686610436271

This was a deceptively dense bit with a lot crammed into a few short minutes. The thing that strikes me most is, once again, the weak link. That would be us; our attitudes; our will to commit, and to what we would apply it. I disagree with the assertion that prior to Musk's acquisition of twitter, there was no way for people of common interests and goals to get together. Even Eville™ facebook provides ample opportunity for such congress. I would also point out that the dissemination of the brands of information that this guy is claiming to be so recent, has been largely available for over 30 years now. USENET was a fine resource with tens of thousands of newsgroups where people discussed and argued over anything from the manifold deceptions of "government" (e.g. Gulf of Tonkin) to how to rim your girlfriend. Saying that this is some new thing is clearly incorrect. To my eyes, the real difference here is one not of access, but of incentive - motivation. Prior to 9/11, Americans were mostly droning along from day to day in the cloud that lead them to take nearly everything in their lives for granted as they wrung their hands over which color ought be the new BMW. Then the towers were demolished in a cloud of vast lies and bullshit. It was interesting to observe how vast legions of Americans outright refused to consider that which was so obvious to we, the engineers, shrieking at us that we were looney conspiracy theorists, apparently oblivious to the fact that the official story describes a pretty grand and very dark conspiracy in itself. It seems to me that the odd bedfellows phenomenon is now arising not due to sudden availability to truth, but to the fact that Theye are squeezing us more severely than ever before, encroaching in a ceaseless expansion of trespass to the point that businessmen can barely conduct business without "government's" nose in their sphincters. So it's really not some great awakening born of the great and inherent, if heretofore latent, goodness of these people, but due almost solely to the desperation of rats with no place left to hide.

RELATED (case study): Fed court rules cops can physically force you to unlock your phone

//

Is there any reason but naiveté to think the same thing isn't happening in the other direction? https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1781487296161694092 Grade-school civics-class textbook fantasies concerning "fair and impartial" juries (among many other similarly comforting fairy tales) are all well and good - but that's not how things work in the real world (especially relative to the hyper-hysterical environment in which we've all been steeped for almost the last decade). Just as for the last two presidential elections, no matter the outcome of this trial (or the others), a substantial and significant number of people are going to reject it as biased, invalid, and (further) proof of perfidy.

So it's not $61 billion to Ukraine. It's $61 billion + $8 billion that was supposed to go to Taiwan + $5 billion in frozen Russian assets: total going to Ukraine $74 Billion. If Biden has the ability to give more to Ukraine, he will do it. His obsession and hatred and bloodlust for Russia is stunning. https://news.antiwar.com/2024/04/19/95-billion-foreign-war-bills-move-toward-house-vote/

https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1781073668811960512 1781073668811960512

https://twitter.com/GlennJacobsTN/status/1781459214994465251

https://twitter.com/BobMurphyEcon/status/1781694074921075025

How does losing a hand, stop the war? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeK0uRtmg_8 {Decoy Voice | 19 April 2024} As activists block bridges and airports across the country, how are they so coordinated? And why are they all suddenly chaining their arms together in barrels? ]